Posts: 11,728
Threads: 210
Joined: Aug 2016
Syne
Nov 30, 2021 06:38 PM
(This post was last modified: Nov 30, 2021 06:39 PM by Syne.)
Again, when SS realizes she can't justify her own claims, arguments, and accusations she always resorts to bring up some older post and just being vacuously snarky:
(Nov 30, 2021 05:47 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote: (Nov 30, 2021 05:17 PM)Syne Wrote: Brescoll said that paying emotionally neutral pays and, if you can't, at least explain what ticked you off in the first place.
https://www.medindia.net/news/are-angry-...5002-1.htm
Well, what ticked you off?
Was it this?
(Nov 29, 2021 04:02 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote: Nice to see that you’re finally admitting that you’re a troll though.
What part of someone saying, that women at least being able to explain why they're angry would help, ticks you off? Why else would you quote that one little bit (a citation of someone else) and project being ticked off on me?
Because it's really just your anger, you don't fully recognize or understand the reason for...making it irrational and leading to such irrational assumptions.
You mistaking anything I've said as an admission is just more evidence that you irrationally read into things stuff that is not objectively there. And you seem too emotional to realize it, even when literally told.
No wonder we don't hold women accountable. You're a brilliant example of why.
Posts: 3,559
Threads: 182
Joined: Aug 2015
Secular Sanity
Nov 30, 2021 06:59 PM
(This post was last modified: Nov 30, 2021 06:59 PM by Secular Sanity.)
(Nov 30, 2021 06:38 PM)Syne Wrote: What part of someone saying, that women at least being able to explain why they're angry would help, ticks you off? Why else would you quote that one little bit (a citation of someone else) and project being ticked off on me?
You sound angry. You’re resorting to cuss words because all your statements rest on erroneous assumptions. Must be very frustrating for you...leading to just such outbursts.
What, did some Chad fuck you over?
Posts: 11,728
Threads: 210
Joined: Aug 2016
Syne
Nov 30, 2021 08:12 PM
(Nov 30, 2021 06:59 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote: (Nov 30, 2021 06:38 PM)Syne Wrote: What part of someone saying, that women at least being able to explain why they're angry would help, ticks you off? Why else would you quote that one little bit (a citation of someone else) and project being ticked off on me?
You sound angry. You’re resorting to cuss words because all your statements rest on erroneous assumptions. Must be very frustrating for you...leading to just such outbursts. So any profanity is now a sign of frustration, huh?
You're still projecting.
See ↓↓↓↓
Quote:What, did some Chad fuck you over?
I am a Chad.
Posts: 3,559
Threads: 182
Joined: Aug 2015
Secular Sanity
Nov 30, 2021 08:34 PM
(Nov 30, 2021 08:12 PM)Syne Wrote: So any profanity is now a sign of frustration, huh?
You're still projecting.
See ↓↓↓↓
Quote:What, did some Chad fuck you over?
I simply copied what you said.
Syne Wrote:I am a Chad.
Of course you are. 
Posts: 11,728
Threads: 210
Joined: Aug 2016
Syne
Nov 30, 2021 09:07 PM
(Nov 30, 2021 08:34 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote: (Nov 30, 2021 08:12 PM)Syne Wrote: So any profanity is now a sign of frustration, huh?
You're still projecting.
See ↓↓↓↓
Quote:What, did some Chad fuck you over?
I simply copied what you said. You're lying again. I said:
(Nov 16, 2021 11:34 PM)Syne Wrote: What, did some Chad fuck you and split? See, you're so irrational and emotional you can't even be held accountable for faithfully quoting anyone.
Posts: 3,305
Threads: 100
Joined: Jan 2017
confused2
Dec 2, 2021 05:40 PM
I guess Syne would be against doxing people like the famous Swiss biologist Wilson Edwards - probably just the tip of the iceberg.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-59456548
Posts: 11,728
Threads: 210
Joined: Aug 2016
Syne
Dec 2, 2021 06:58 PM
(Dec 2, 2021 05:40 PM)confused2 Wrote: I guess Syne would be against doxing people like the famous Swiss biologist Wilson Edwards - probably just the tip of the iceberg.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-59456548
You can't dox someone who doesn't exist. Sad that has to be pointed out to you.
Posts: 3,305
Threads: 100
Joined: Jan 2017
confused2
Dec 2, 2021 08:41 PM
Sadly you can only find out someone doesn't exist by doxing them - sorry I had to point that out.
Posts: 11,728
Threads: 210
Joined: Aug 2016
Syne
Dec 2, 2021 09:13 PM
(Dec 2, 2021 08:41 PM)confused2 Wrote: Sadly you can only find out someone doesn't exist by doxing them - sorry I had to point that out.
You still don't even understand what doxing is. For example, Stryder has the email addresses of every member of this forum. That's not doxing. Doxing is not where someone has been freely given personal information. Doxing is where that information is shared without the individual's consent. You have to have an actual person for that.
In your cited story, journalist/investigators checked with the Swiss embassy, Swiss citizen registry, and academic articles under that name. Things anyone could do if you use your real name, occupation, and country online...sharing your own personal information. If Meta had found an actual individual, it would have been doxing to share that info publicly, but as there was none, sharing the company that was the source doesn't dox anyone. Even in your article, they only mention "individuals associated with," without naming any individual.
That's not doxing.
Posts: 3,305
Threads: 100
Joined: Jan 2017
confused2
Dec 2, 2021 10:38 PM
(This post was last modified: Dec 2, 2021 11:12 PM by confused2.
Edit Reason: bot changed to sockpuppet
)
(Dec 2, 2021 09:13 PM)Syne Wrote: (Dec 2, 2021 08:41 PM)confused2 Wrote: Sadly you can only find out someone doesn't exist by doxing them - sorry I had to point that out.
You still don't even understand what doxing is. For example, Stryder has the email addresses of every member of this forum. That's not doxing. Doxing is not where someone has been freely given personal information. Doxing is where that information is shared without the individual's consent. You have to have an actual person for that.
In your cited story, journalist/investigators checked with the Swiss embassy, Swiss citizen registry, and academic articles under that name. Things anyone could do if you use your real name, occupation, and country online...sharing your own personal information. If Meta had found an actual individual, it would have been doxing to share that info publicly, but as there was none, sharing the company that was the source doesn't dox anyone. Even in your article, they only mention "individuals associated with," without naming any individual.
That's not doxing. I didn't know (edit: or care that) he had 'freely given [false] personal information' - it doesn't affect the issue of whether or not (in principle) you allow individuals to be traced (doxed) back to the point where you can identify them as (for example) Chinese sockpuppets.
|
