Trump bans voting by mail (with some exceptions) by executive order

[Syne]

It's very easy (albeit illegal) for somebody else to fill it out and mail it in. Determining who did that and making a criminal case against them would be difficult. Especially when those in charge don't really want to know.

And yet as shown already there is zero evidence for this kind of voter fraud in already mail-in voting states. Evidently the motive is simply not there, especially when mailing your ballot makes it so much easier to vote anyway.

It's undetectable. Of course there's "zero evidence." 9_9
They'd have to be willing to clean up their voter rolls and then actually make a concerted effort to look for such fraud... just to have a chance to catch it.

[Magical Realist]

It's undetectable. Of course there's "zero evidence

No it isn't. It's detected as soon as two ballots show up from the same person.

[Syne]

It's undetectable. Of course there's "zero evidence

No it isn't. It's detected as soon as two ballots show up from the same person.

Again, for the reading impaired, if the person has moved out of state, died, or didn't vote there would not be two ballots for the same person, but one person could send in two ballots... his and one from a moved, died, or non-voter.

[Magical Realist]

Again, for the reading impaired, if the person has moved out of state, died, or didn't vote there would not be two ballots for the same person, but one person could send in two ballots... his and one from a moved, died, or non-voter.

Moved or dead voters are a small fraction of the population, and people trying to use their ballot just to vote twice for the same candidate even smaller. If you think it is going on in significant election-deciding numbers, why? Because your orange clown said so? Hitchen's Razor: Claims made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

[Syne]

Moved or dead voters are a small fraction of the population, and people trying to use their ballot just to vote twice for the same candidate even smaller.

Since it is undetectable, there's no way you could know that. As usual, you just lie when you have no argument.
One fraudster could submit far more than two votes. They can harvest them. Like Democrat drives to register people to vote, where they, illegally, won't register Republicans and have been caught paying homeless people to register... knowing they have zero interest in voting. That's one way you can generate undetectable fraudulent ballots.

If you think it is going on in significant election-deciding numbers, why? Because your orange clown said so? Hitchen's Razor: Claims made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

Like I said initially, Democrats in these states will never find what they don't look for. It's by design. That's why they are so against giving the federal government their voter rolls, to be checked for accuracy, or having any federal oversight in their elections. They aren't so defensive for no reason, and where there's smoke, there's often fire.

And you wouldn't dismiss it if you thought it was working against you, just like Democrats tried to claim Trump stole the 2016 election.

[Magical Realist]

Since it is undetectable, there's no way you could know that.

LOL If it's undetectable, then you can't possibly know it's happening. Once again, Hitchen's razor.

Like I said initially, Democrats in these states will never find what they don't look for. It's by design. That's why they are so against giving the federal government their voter rolls, to be checked for accuracy, or having any federal oversight in their elections. They aren't so defensive for no reason, and where there's smoke, there's often fire.

LOL Right out of the MAGA playbook. Piling on more bullshit on top of more bullshit. Still not a shred of evidence. The great thing about conspiracy theories is that they can't be disproven. So they must be happening, right?