Jokes, memes, and cartoons

(Jun 4, 2026 04:17 AM)Magical Realist Wrote:

Quote:Repeatedly proven on this forum, hell, within this very thread.

Give me examples then where I have been unable to comprehend or use written information in a practical context. The very fact that I'm debating and arguing with written information proves you wrong.

I've pointed them out every time. If you can't find them, you're just proving my point. Try searching for terms: comprehend, illiterate, understand.

Quote:

Quote:Another sad strawman, as I've never mentioned any "objective state of degeneracy." I've only explained to you the laws in various places.... that you were complete unaware of.

So you're withdrawing you're claims that drag queens and pride parades are degenerate. Great! Nothing more to say then.

No. You do understand that there's a difference between something being objective and not, right? @_@
For a degenerate like you, very little is degenerate or offensive. As opposed to normal people, with a modicum of moral standards.

Quote:I've pointed them out every time. If you can't find them, you're just proving my point. Try searching for terms: comprehend, illiterate, understand.

So you're lying again. That's what I thought.

Quote:For a degenerate like you, very little is degenerate or offensive. As opposed to normal people, with a modicum of moral standards.

Most people are mature and intelligent enough to know camp and burlesque when they see it and seeing it in the comedic terms for which it is intended. That's why pride parades are held in all states with no one complaining except a few uncultured MAGA phobes like that one girl and you trying to make some entirely irrelevant political point about LGBT people in general.

(Jun 4, 2026 04:30 AM)Magical Realist Wrote:

Quote:I've pointed them out every time. If you can't find them, you're just proving my point. Try searching for terms: comprehend, illiterate, understand.

So you're lying again. That's what I thought.

LOL! You just proved you didn't comprehend EVERY TIME I've explained your piss-poor reading comprehension... PROVING you're functionally illiterate.
Thanks, dipshit.

Quote:

Quote:For a degenerate like you, very little is degenerate or offensive. As opposed to normal people, with a modicum of moral standards.

Most people are mature and intelligent enough to know camp and burlesque when they see it and seeing it in the comedic terms for which it is intended. That's why pride parades are held in all states with no one complaining except a few MAGA homophobes like that one girl and you trying to make some entirely irrelevant political point about LGBT people in general.

No, only degenerates think burlesque (pasties, etc.) is appropriate for children.
That you assume that a LESBIAN is a "MAGA homophobe" shows how out of touch you are.

Quote:No, only degenerates think burlesque (pasties, etc.) is appropriate for children.
That you assume that a LESBIAN is a "MAGA homophobe" shows how out of touch you are.

Yes..drag queens are entirely appropriate for kids, particularly those mature and cultured enough to understand it as what it is. As for the so-called "lesbian", she's either a MAGA shill or just a MAGA hater. Apparently being a uneducated MAGAT holds priority even over one's sexual orientation.

(Jun 4, 2026 04:42 AM)Magical Realist Wrote:

Quote:No, only degenerates think burlesque (pasties, etc.) is appropriate for children.
That you assume that a LESBIAN is a "MAGA homophobe" shows how out of touch you are.

Yes..drag queens are entirely appropriate for kids, particularly those mature and cultured enough to understand it as what it is. As for the so-called "lesbian", she's either a MAGA shill or just a MAGA hater. Apparently being a uneducated MAGAT holds priority even over one's sexual orientation.

LOL! Of course you have zero defense for your functional illiteracy. You know it, I know it, everyone knows it.
All you have is hating on a random lesbian you don't know.

Oh, and claiming burlesque is good for children... like a groomer perv.

Quote:LOL! Of course you have zero defense for your functional illiteracy. You know it, I know it, everyone knows it.

Claims made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. And I even proved I'm not functionally illiterate due to my ability to use written information for debate and communicating complex thoughts and ideas. So you're lying.

Quote:Oh, and claiming burlesque is good for children... like a groomer perv.

Any evidence of children seeing men in drag being impacted negatively in any way? No? No millions of kids who watched Mrs. Doubtfire or Tootsie or Tyler Perry's comedic Madea who were scarred for life? That's what I thought.

(Jun 4, 2026 05:09 AM)Magical Realist Wrote:

Quote:LOL! Of course you have zero defense for your functional illiteracy. You know it, I know it, everyone knows it.

Claims made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. And I even proved I'm not functionally illiterate due to my ability to use written information for debate and communicating complex thoughts and ideas. So you're lying.

So not only can't you remember the many time I've explained your complete lack of comprehension... even just today... you're too chickenshit to go look. Got it!

Quote:

Quote:Oh, and claiming burlesque is good for children... like a groomer perv.

Any evidence of children seeing men in drag being impacted negatively in any way? No? No millions of kids who watched Mrs. Doubtfire or Tootsie or Tyler Perry's comedic Madea who were scarred for life? That's what I thought.

Drag is not the same as burlesque, moron. If you're going to defend something, maybe you should know what it is.
Since I never mentioned drag, that has always been your stupid strawman. Apparently you can't even remember the many times I've told you that was a strawman... again, today.

Are you sundowning too? @_@

Quote:LOL! Of course you have zero defense for your functional illiteracy. You know it, I know it, everyone knows it.

Claims made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. And I even proved I'm not functionally illiterate due to my ability to use written information for debate and communicating complex thoughts and ideas. So you're lying.

So not only can't you remember the many time I've explained your complete lack of comprehension... even just today... you're too chickenshit to go look. Got it!

Oh, and claiming burlesque is good for children... like a groomer perv.


Any evidence of children seeing men in drag being impacted negatively in any way? No? No millions of kids who watched Mrs. Doubtfire or Tootsie or Tyler Perry's comedic Madea who were scarred for life? That's what I thought
Drag is not the same as burlesque, moron. If you're going to defend something, maybe you should know what it is.
? @_@

Google AI:

"Drag and burlesque are distinct but overlapping art forms that frequently cross over. Drag focuses on theatrical gender expression and performance, while burlesque is the art of the tease. When combined, the hybrid performance is often referred to as draglesque.

While they are independent performance arts, they share deep historical roots and stages:

Drag: Centers on costuming, lip-syncing, dancing, and exaggerating gender norms (whether done by drag queens or drag kings). It is not inherently sexual.

Burlesque: Uses striptease, storytelling, and comedy to satirize or celebrate.The Overlap: Performers often incorporate striptease or "reveals" into drag routines, or burlesque performers incorporate drag aesthetics, resulting in the seamless blending of the two scenes in many cities."

Quote:Since I never mentioned drag, that has always been your stupid strawman.

Since that was exactly what my initial post was all about, I assumed you knew that. In fact you did mention it when you complained about drag queens reading stories to kids in libraries. You're clearly getting too stupid to even argue with anymore. I shouldn't waste my time here.

(Jun 4, 2026 06:45 AM)Magical Realist Wrote: Google AI:

"Drag and burlesque are distinct but overlapping art forms that frequently cross over. Drag focuses on theatrical gender expression and performance, while burlesque is the art of the tease. When combined, the hybrid performance is often referred to as draglesque.

While they are independent performance arts, they share deep historical roots and stages:

Drag: Centers on costuming, lip-syncing, dancing, and exaggerating gender norms (whether done by drag queens or drag kings). It is not inherently sexual.

Burlesque: Uses striptease, storytelling, and comedy to satirize or celebrate.The Overlap: Performers often incorporate striptease or "reveals" into drag routines, or burlesque performers incorporate drag aesthetics, resulting in the seamless blending of the two scenes in many cities."

I guess you still don't see the difference. 9_9

Quote:

Quote:Since I never mentioned drag, that has always been your stupid strawman.

Since that was exactly what my initial post was all about, I assumed you knew that. In fact you did mention it when you complained about drag queens reading stories to kids in libraries. You're clearly getting too stupid to even argue with anymore. I shouldn't waste my time here.

Oh, you mean your cherry-picking to strawman from the beginning? Yep, I clarified and you continued the strawman.
You do know that drag queen story time doesn't happen at pride parades, right? @_@

Quote:You do know that drag queen story time doesn't happen at pride parades,

LOL You mean the drag queens you lied about and accused of mocking women like blackface does to black people and that you claimed you never mentioned? It's clear you don't even remember what you are arguing for anymore. My original point stands unrefuted:

"She needs to chill and quit getting so enraged about basically nothing. Think of pride parades and drag queens as cosplay for LGBT. You might find it much more tolerable and "unserious" from that perspective.."

---