Once more, National Geographic goes for the woo

(Jan 4, 2020 08:29 PM)Syne Wrote: Do yourself a favor, and don't look up what she looks like now.

Leave it to incel Syne to find fault with the beautiful young girl.

(Jan 5, 2020 10:26 PM)Magical Realist Wrote:

(Jan 4, 2020 08:29 PM)Syne Wrote: Do yourself a favor, and don't look up what she looks like now.

Leave it to incel Syne to find fault with the beautiful young girl.

She ain't young anymore, dumbass.
Yet again, you've proven you're the one to attack others, completely unprovoked.

(Jan 5, 2020 11:31 PM)Syne Wrote:

(Jan 5, 2020 10:26 PM)Magical Realist Wrote:

(Jan 4, 2020 08:29 PM)Syne Wrote: Do yourself a favor, and don't look up what she looks like now.

Leave it to incel Syne to find fault with the beautiful young girl.

She ain't young anymore, dumbass.
Yet again, you've proven you're the one to attack others, completely unprovoked.

She's beautiful and young in the photo, which is what we are talking about.

(Jan 6, 2020 12:03 AM)Magical Realist Wrote:

(Jan 5, 2020 11:31 PM)Syne Wrote:

(Jan 5, 2020 10:26 PM)Magical Realist Wrote:

(Jan 4, 2020 08:29 PM)Syne Wrote: Do yourself a favor, and don't look up what she looks like now.

Leave it to incel Syne to find fault with the beautiful young girl.

She ain't young anymore, dumbass.
Yet again, you've proven you're the one to attack others, completely unprovoked.

She's beautiful and young in the photo, which is what we are talking about.

What part of "what she looks like now" don't you understand? I didn't say a thing against the Nat Geo photo. Figger it out.

(Jan 3, 2020 03:59 PM)Magical Realist Wrote: I saw a few episodes of that. I thought it a fair and objective treatment of the matter.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dI1p7lmQn8&t=5s

I think what bothers me about it MR, is that National Geographic should stick with reality, and not pseudo-realities and imaginative stories. (my opinion) I'm open minded (not about Big Foot lol) but, there are certain networks that shouldn't dabble in pseudo-science. If it were a sci-fi network or something of the sort, I don't think I'd have the same problem with their Big Foot series.

(Jan 6, 2020 03:12 AM)Syne Wrote:

(Jan 6, 2020 12:03 AM)Magical Realist Wrote:

(Jan 5, 2020 11:31 PM)Syne Wrote:

(Jan 5, 2020 10:26 PM)Magical Realist Wrote:

(Jan 4, 2020 08:29 PM)Syne Wrote: Do yourself a favor, and don't look up what she looks like now.

Leave it to incel Syne to find fault with the beautiful young girl.

She ain't young anymore, dumbass.
Yet again, you've proven you're the one to attack others, completely unprovoked.

She's beautiful and young in the photo, which is what we are talking about.

What part of "what she looks like now" don't you understand? I didn't say a thing against the Nat Geo photo. Figger it out.

Noone was talking about how she looks now. We were talking about the photo and how she looks in it. You just had to demean her by bringing up her present appearance. You're pathetic.

(Jan 6, 2020 03:35 AM)Magical Realist Wrote:

(Jan 6, 2020 03:12 AM)Syne Wrote: What part of "what she looks like now" don't you understand? I didn't say a thing against the Nat Geo photo. Figger it out.

Noone was talking about how she looks now. We were talking about the photo and how she looks in it. You just had to demean her by bringing up her present appearance. You're pathetic.

No moron, I actually wanted people to forever remember her as that young and beautiful, unmarred by the current reality. Because I made the mistake of looking it up, out of simple curiosity. That you assume a demeaning intent is only a projection of the blackness in your own heart...that so often spills all over this forum, without any provocation at all.

That you have to make so much about such innocuous comments seems to only illustrate how desperate you are to justify and feel righteous about your very, very petty hatred of others. Again, just quit. No one really wants you to expose your ass. There are people here who genuinely like you. Don't make that harder.

(Jan 6, 2020 03:56 AM)Syne Wrote:

(Jan 6, 2020 03:35 AM)Magical Realist Wrote:

(Jan 6, 2020 03:12 AM)Syne Wrote: What part of "what she looks like now" don't you understand? I didn't say a thing against the Nat Geo photo. Figger it out.

Noone was talking about how she looks now. We were talking about the photo and how she looks in it. You just had to demean her by bringing up her present appearance. You're pathetic.

No moron, I actually wanted people to forever remember her as that young and beautiful, unmarred by the current reality. Because I made the mistake of looking it up, out of simple curiosity. That you assume a demeaning intent is only a projection of the blackness in your own heart...that so often spills all over this forum, without any provocation at all.

That you have to make so much about such innocuous comments seems to only illustrate how desperate you are to justify and feel righteous about your very, very petty hatred of others. Again, just quit. No one really wants you to expose your ass. There are people here who genuinely like you. Don't make that harder.

LOL! You bring up her shocking appearance now while we are discussing her beautiful photo and I'm the one with the black heart? You're insane.

Oh my.

(Jan 6, 2020 04:00 AM)Magical Realist Wrote:

(Jan 6, 2020 03:56 AM)Syne Wrote: No moron, I actually wanted people to forever remember her as that young and beautiful, unmarred by the current reality. Because I made the mistake of looking it up, out of simple curiosity. That you assume a demeaning intent is only a projection of the blackness in your own heart...that so often spills all over this forum, without any provocation at all.

That you have to make so much about such innocuous comments seems to only illustrate how desperate you are to justify and feel righteous about your very, very petty hatred of others. Again, just quit. No one really wants you to expose your ass. There are people here who genuinely like you. Don't make that harder.

LOL! You bring up her shocking appearance now while we are discussing her beautiful photo and I'm the one with the black heart? You're insane.

You're the only one who said her appearance now was "shocking" or any demeaning language about her at all. That's because it's your MO. You can't help it. And where I only warned people against tarnishing the girl's beauty, you seem rather intent on beating the dead horse to ensure everyone looks it up for themselves. Demeaning people seems to be the only way you can elevate yourself, even if you have to project your own demeaning behavior on others.