Once more, National Geographic goes for the woo

(Jan 3, 2020 12:39 AM)Syne Wrote:

(Jan 3, 2020 12:30 AM)Magical Realist Wrote:

Quote:No, you're just throwing a hissy fit

No..he's throwing the hissy fit. It's obvious as hell. And then he bashes Nat Geo as a bad magazine. Totally childish behavior just because they publish an article on the paranormal.

You're projecting.

No..I'm describing accurately what he ranted about.

(Jan 3, 2020 01:26 AM)Magical Realist Wrote:

(Jan 3, 2020 12:39 AM)Syne Wrote: You're projecting.

No..I'm describing accurately what he ranted about.

Myopic too.

(Jan 3, 2020 02:35 AM)Syne Wrote:

(Jan 3, 2020 01:26 AM)Magical Realist Wrote:

(Jan 3, 2020 12:39 AM)Syne Wrote: You're projecting.

No..I'm describing accurately what he ranted about.

Myopic too.

You'll just say any stupid thing to get the last word.

(Jan 3, 2020 04:35 AM)Magical Realist Wrote: You'll just say any stupid thing to get the last word.

Again, you're projecting. Just stop already.

I lost respect for National Geographic, when a few years ago, they came out with a series about Big Foot. It was mildly entertaining (I watched a few episodes), but complete woo.

I saw a few episodes of that. I thought it a fair and objective treatment of the matter.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dI1p7lmQn8&t=5s

Why is it that when I hear or read the words National Geographic, I think of that green-eyed Afghan girl on one of the covers? What a great photo that was, I think it belongs in the Louvre, right up there alongside Mona.

(Jan 3, 2020 06:08 PM)Zinjanthropos Wrote: Why is it that when I hear or read the words National Geographic, I think of that green-eyed Afghan girl on one of the covers? What a great photo that was, I think it belongs in the Louvre, right up there alongside Mona.

Do yourself a favor, and don't look up what she looks like now.

(Jan 4, 2020 08:29 PM)Syne Wrote: Do yourself a favor, and don't look up what she looks like now.

I figure she probably ended up some guy’s property, hidden from view.