Once more, National Geographic goes for the woo

#11
Magical Realist Offline
(Jan 3, 2020 12:39 AM)Syne Wrote:
(Jan 3, 2020 12:30 AM)Magical Realist Wrote:
Quote:No, you're just throwing a hissy fit

No..he's throwing the hissy fit. It's obvious as hell. And then he bashes Nat Geo as a bad magazine. Totally childish behavior just because they publish an article on the paranormal.

You're projecting.

No..I'm describing accurately what he ranted about.
Reply
#12
Syne Offline
(Jan 3, 2020 01:26 AM)Magical Realist Wrote:
(Jan 3, 2020 12:39 AM)Syne Wrote: You're projecting.

No..I'm describing accurately what he ranted about.

Myopic too.
Reply
#13
Magical Realist Offline
(Jan 3, 2020 02:35 AM)Syne Wrote:
(Jan 3, 2020 01:26 AM)Magical Realist Wrote:
(Jan 3, 2020 12:39 AM)Syne Wrote: You're projecting.

No..I'm describing accurately what he ranted about.

Myopic too.

You'll just say any stupid thing to get the last word.
Reply
#14
Syne Offline
(Jan 3, 2020 04:35 AM)Magical Realist Wrote: You'll just say any stupid thing to get the last word.
Again, you're projecting. Just stop already.
Reply
#15
Leigha Offline
I lost respect for National Geographic, when a few years ago, they came out with a series about Big Foot. It was mildly entertaining (I watched a few episodes), but complete woo.
Reply
Reply
#17
Zinjanthropos Offline
Why is it that when I hear or read the words National Geographic, I think of that green-eyed Afghan girl on one of the covers? What a great photo that was, I think it belongs in the Louvre, right up there alongside Mona.
Reply
#18
Magical Realist Offline
(Jan 3, 2020 06:08 PM)Zinjanthropos Wrote: Why is it that when I hear or read the words National Geographic, I think of that green-eyed Afghan girl on one of the covers? What a great photo that was, I think it belongs in the Louvre, right up there alongside Mona.


[Image: s-l640.jpg]
[Image: s-l640.jpg]

Reply
#19
Syne Offline
Do yourself a favor, and don't look up what she looks like now.
Reply
#20
Zinjanthropos Offline
(Jan 4, 2020 08:29 PM)Syne Wrote: Do yourself a favor, and don't look up what she looks like now.

I figure she probably ended up some guy’s property, hidden from view.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article How we cured DEI at the National Institutes of Health (Jay Bhattacharya) C C 0 123 Dec 12, 2025 08:21 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Woo woo returns: "60 Minutes" and the revival of television gullibility C C 1 342 Oct 30, 2025 06:51 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Article New lies about climate change + Calling out quantum woo C C 1 599 Jun 24, 2025 09:33 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Article DEI “studies” displace scientific research at the National Science Foundation C C 0 484 Dec 4, 2024 11:03 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Do scientists make good presidents? How five national leaders perform C C 0 397 Jun 7, 2024 04:35 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Once again, Scientific American ideology distorts science: "Animal sex is not binary" C C 0 485 May 19, 2023 02:05 PM
Last Post: C C
  A once respected biology journal indicts evolutionary biology for ableism C C 0 442 Dec 30, 2022 03:54 PM
Last Post: C C
  Earth Day 2022: Doomsday isn't at the corner + Earth Day polluted by woo & ideology C C 0 416 Apr 19, 2022 06:46 PM
Last Post: C C
  When fact checking goes wrong + Non-GMO labels lead to lawsuits (ignoring science) C C 0 393 Feb 1, 2022 07:30 PM
Last Post: C C
  'Woke' Scientific American goes anti-GMO + SciAm's hit job on E.O. Wilson C C 1 602 Jan 1, 2022 02:18 AM
Last Post: Syne



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)