What Men Want

#11
Who knows what they thought? As I intimated earlier,  it's  either two guys who don't know they're crazy but have hope their actions have a desired affect or two guys who know they're crazy as a fox and don't care how they act.. In both cases the audience is left bewildered by their actions, allowing for anyone else watching to know what you, another witness, is thinking. (As in WTF?)
Reply
#12
(Sep 24, 2018 02:28 AM)Syne Wrote: Men are taught a lot of lies about what actually attracts women, like looks, muscles (hence the "stunting"), money, being nice, etc., often from women.

So they are definitely pretty trusting of such ill-conceived advice. But considering women don't even know what they're attracted too, it's definitely dumber to be equally unaware of your own desires as someone else's. And who could expect men to know something about women that the women do not even know about themselves.

Yes...yes, they are, and from men like Peterson. Let’s cut to chase, shall we, faker fox? I’m tired of being nice. Here's another little WTF?

(Sep 5, 2018 05:17 PM)Syne Wrote: First, you shouldn't plagiarize Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Ways_...fs_or_Ways?  Dodgy

Err, the link was provided.
https://www.scivillage.com/thread-6087-p...l#pid23090

(Aug 15, 2018 08:13 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote: A more interesting question is why have you been presenting Peterson’s arguments as if they were your own?  Some of the things you’ve said are almost word for word.

(Aug 16, 2018 12:04 AM)Syne Wrote: Maybe you really don't know how learning works, despite all your misandrist ranting about boys in school. When you learn something you agree with, it becomes part of you...integrated into your worldview. But most of what Peterson says is stuff I already knew.

What in the hell?  Maybe Peterson should sue you, you little plagiarizing, mother f_____.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhPnxmw4xNA

"But here’s the comical part. This just made me laugh, man. What were the five categories of most desirable male entity used most broadly in female pornography? It’s so embarrassing. Women you have to cover your heads while I say this.

"Vampire, werewolf, billionaire, surgeon, and pirate."— Jordan Peterson


Uh...no, here’s the comical part. Why in the world would you want to plagiarize a fucking idiot?  I hate his little arrogant, dorky, know-it-all laugh. He’s as dumb as a box of rocks. You might want to cover head while I say this.

"A Billion Wicked Thoughts: What the Internet Tells Us about Sexual Relationships"

There were five pages in that book about what men are interested in and one paragraph about what women want. Imagine that…and all from the movie "Twilight" and "Fifty Shades of Grey."

The mythical male?  Why would we have to invent a mythical male? Hmm…oh, I don't know.  Maybe because we want someone who knows—who knows us—who knows what to do—who knows about female anatomy, hence, the mythical male. The billionaire was taught by an older female.

We already know that the majority of straight women search for lesbian porn, not vampires and werewolves. Why? Because it’s about the woman, not the man. There’s a big fat "DUH" for you. Most pornography shows us doing for you for and not the other way around. Go ahead, ask your male counterparts to show you where the clitoris is, and if you’ve read one of my previous links, you can say, "Nope, you're wrong, dumbass! Why? Because a woman on the internet felt sorry for me and provided me with this handy dandy, little link. Yeah, that’s right. She didn’t think I was smart enough to figure it out on my own. She didn’t think I was a so-called alpha male. She thinks the human alpha male is a myth. She felt sorry for me because women are more sympathetic than men."

And how’s this for strength? We’ve kept you alive. We’ve guarded and protected you. We’ve loved and cared for you. You are alive because we paid attention to your every move. We watched you learn to crawl, walk, and climb. We’ve taught you about the dangers in this world. We’ve taught you when to stand up for yourself and when to walk away. The one thing that you should be grateful for is our love, and our fierce, protective nature.

What do women want? We want someone who is our equal. What does that say about a man—a man that desires someone that they consider less than? Confident? I think not. Insecure? Meknows so.

Is it true what they say, that Jordan Peterson is the stupid man’s smart person? Yeah, slightly, and yet, here you are plagiarizing and mimicking him. That is absolutely fucking hilarious.

And once again...

....................../´¯/)
....................,/¯../
.................../..../
............./´¯/'...'/´¯¯`·¸
........../'/.../..../......./¨¯\
........('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...')
.........\.................'...../
..........''...\.......... _.·´
............\..............(
..............\.............\...
Reply
#13
(Sep 24, 2018 03:40 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote: And once again...
....................../´¯/)
....................,/¯../
.................../..../
............./´¯/'...'/´¯¯`·¸
........../'/.../..../......./¨¯\
........('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...')
.........\.................'...../
..........''...\.......... _.·´
............\..............(
..............\.............\...
Yet again, if you don't want to engage with me, simply don't do it, moron. Rolleyes
Regardless of your authoritarian fantasies where you get to control the actions of others (or say whatever you like) with total impunity, you don't actually have that power in reality. The only person you can control is yourself, but apparently that's beyond you.
Quote:
(Sep 24, 2018 02:28 AM)Syne Wrote: Men are taught a lot of lies about what actually attracts women, like looks, muscles (hence the "stunting"), money, being nice, etc., often from women.

So they are definitely pretty trusting of such ill-conceived advice. But considering women don't even know what they're attracted too, it's definitely dumber to be equally unaware of your own desires as someone else's. And who could expect men to know something about women that the women do not even know about themselves.

Yes...yes, they are, and from men like Peterson. Let’s cut to chase, shall we, faker fox? I’m tired of being nice. Here's another little WTF?
No, Peterson doesn't tell those lies. But it's telling how quickly you jump to a non sequitur red herring in lieu of ANY attempt to justify that claim. Dodgy
Gotta distract from the reality that you have zero arguments to rebut the fact that women simply don't know what they're actually attracted to. And in light of your misandrist taunts about men, that actually makes women: "Smarter? Not so much."
Quote:
(Sep 5, 2018 05:17 PM)Syne Wrote: First, you shouldn't plagiarize Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Ways_...fs_or_Ways?  Dodgy

Err, the link was provided.
https://www.scivillage.com/thread-6087-p...l#pid23090
Wow, you really are an intellectually dishonest moron.

plagiarism - the practice of taking someone else's work or ideas and passing them off as one's own.

All of the following are considered plagiarism:
failing to put a quotation in quotation marks
- https://www.plagiarism.org/article/what-is-plagiarism


Check the post I was replying to again. Do you see any quotation marks...any attribution to the source of those EXACT two sentences?
Nope. That's plagiarism, and you posting a link 10 posts back does nothing to change that fact. They were presented as your words, without any indication otherwise.
Now be an adult for once and take responsibility for your own bad behavior. You know, instead of blaming all your own mistakes on men. Rolleyes
Quote:
(Aug 15, 2018 08:13 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote: A more interesting question is why have you been presenting Peterson’s arguments as if they were your own?  Some of the things you’ve said are almost word for word.

(Aug 16, 2018 12:04 AM)Syne Wrote: Maybe you really don't know how learning works, despite all your misandrist ranting about boys in school. When you learn something you agree with, it becomes part of you...integrated into your worldview. But most of what Peterson says is stuff I already knew.

What in the hell?  Maybe Peterson should sue you, you little plagiarizing, mother f_____.
Wow, you really don't know how learning works. You're just determined to prove to everyone what an utter moron you really are...or that you're just so emotional that basic reasoning skill be damned. Obviously this is just projection of your own demonstrated behavior.

Again:
plagiarism - the practice of taking someone else's work or ideas and passing them off as one's own.

I have never claimed any idea that didn't originate with me was mine (and even those I've claimed, I've granted they likely weren't novel...just like many of Peterson's), nor used his words without attribution. You, OTOH, have just posted links to clear evidence of your plagiarism. Rolleyes
Quote:"But here’s the comical part. This just made me laugh, man. What were the five categories of most desirable male entity used most broadly in female pornography? It’s so embarrassing. Women you have to cover your heads while I say this.

"Vampire, werewolf, billionaire, surgeon, and pirate."— Jordan Peterson


Uh...no, here’s the comical part. Why in the world would you want to plagiarize a fucking idiot?  I hate his little arrogant, dorky, know-it-all laugh. He’s as dumb as a box of rocks.  You might want to cover head while I say this.
You have yet to, in all your misandrist rantings, given one solid (read substantial and unemotional) reason to disagree with, much less dislike, Peterson.
Ad hominems are just your emotional reaction...likely to the cognitive dissonance his ideas invoke. It's almost like a cheesy exorcism scene, where the more the priest intones Latin the more the demon spews vomit. Rolleyes
Quote:"A Billion Wicked Thoughts: What the Internet Tells Us about Sexual Relationships"

There were five pages in that book about what men are interested in and one paragraph about what women want. Imagine that…and all from the movie "Twilight" and "Fifty Shades of Grey".  

The mythical male?  Why would we have to invent a mythical male? Hmm…oh, I don't know.  Maybe because we want someone who knows—who knows us—who knows what to do—who knows about female anatomy, hence, the mythical male. The billionaire was taught by an older female.
So...your husband doesn't know how to please you? O_o
Why else would you need a "mythical male", other than the fact that your such a misandrist real men won't give you the time of day?
So you want someone who abuses you, a la Fifty Shades?
Fifty Shades of Grey is Abuse - National Center on Sexual Exploitation
50 Shades of Abuse: 10 Signs of Unhealthy Relationships a la Christian Grey

Granted, if all you can get is a beta male, maybe your fantasies do pendulum too far the other way. Just like incels and rape fantasies.
Quote:We already know that the majority of straight women search for lesbian porn, not vampires and werewolves. Why? Because it’s about the woman, not the man. There’s a big fat "DUH" for you. Most pornography shows us doing for you for and not the other way around. Go ahead, ask your male counterparts to show you where the clitoris is, and if you’ve read one of my previous links, you can say, "Nope, you're wrong, dumbass! Why? Because a woman on the internet felt sorry for me and provided me with this handy dandy, little link. Yeah, that’s right. She didn’t think I was smart enough to figure it out on my own. She didn’t think I was a so-called alpha male. She thinks the human alpha male is a myth. She felt sorry for me because women are more sympathetic than men."
Silly girl, female pornography largely isn't video (your own penchant for lesbian porn aside), because women aren't as visually stimulated as men. Female porn is romance novels (and their accompanying movies), where those exact male tropes are very prominent. See, you don't even understand that a woman's attraction is largely mental/emotional...things a porno can't offer.

But keep telling yourself whatever misandrist fantasies you have to...just keep me out of them. Go to couples counseling, teach your husband how to be a real man.
Quote:And how’s this for strength? We’ve kept you alive. We’ve guarded and protected you. We’ve loved and cared for you. You are alive because we paid attention to your every move. We watched you learn to crawl, walk, and climb. We’ve taught you about the dangers in this world. We’ve taught you when to stand up for yourself and when to walk away. The one thing that you should be grateful for, is our love, and our fierce, protective nature.
And you're alive because good men protected you from bad men.
And no, women are very poor at teaching men about danger, standing up for themselves, and other masculine lessons. Just see the results of single motherhood, e.g. the criminality, substance abuse, depression, etc..
Quote:What do women want? We want someone who is our equal. What does that say about a man—a man that desires someone that they consider less than? Confidence? I think not. Insecure? Meknows so.

Is it true what they say, that Jordan Peterson is the stupid man’s smart person? Yeah, slightly, and yet, here you are plagiarizing and mimicking him. That is absolutely fucking hilarious.
Again, women don't know what they want, and evidence of that is their claim to want an equal while being hypergamous. It's either a hypocritical lie or their own ignorance of themselves. Men just know that they can never find their equal in a woman, because men and women are inherently different. Not "less than", DIFFERENT. Just like a bird and a fish cannot be equals, not because one is inferior to the other, but because they are inherently different.

Your misandrist penis-envy, inferiority complex, and willful ignorance of basic biology won't allow you to know anything at all. You just believe because your feelings tell you to.

Again: "But most of what Peterson says is stuff I already knew."
But we all know you have nothing but ad hominems. You're just a sad, lesbian porn watching, shrew dissatisfied with your beta male of a husband. Quit taking it out on the internet and just go cheat on him already. Rolleyes
Reply
#14
Wowee! That must have touched a little beta nerve. Lots of backpedaling there.  

(Sep 24, 2018 01:12 AM)Syne Wrote: I've asked a few women, and sizing every man up for danger sounds paranoid by comparison.

I highly doubt that.

Paranoid? Really?

(Mar 26, 2018 11:57 PM)Syne Wrote: When entering a new environment, people tend to look around a lot to assess any dangers or info they may need. They don't just dart their eyes around. They focus on each thing they see long enough to categorize its danger/usefulness.

An upside down man? Hmm…I can’t think of any uses for an upside down man. Well, maybe. I’m awfully creative.  Big Grin

Syne Wrote:Wow, you really are an intellectually dishonest moron.

Uh..no, that would be you. Like I said, it’s almost word for word. Um…and there's still the time when you told me that you had academic training in psychology but that’s not true, is it, Syne? Watching Peterson’s YouTube videos doesn’t actually qualify as academic training.

Syne Wrote:Why else would you need a "mythical male?"

I never said that 'I' did. I have what I want. I’ve already told you that several times. Do I feel like I need to defend my husband against your ill-founded assumptions? Nope.

Syne Wrote:Silly girl, female pornography largely isn't video (your own penchant for lesbian porn aside), because women aren't as visually stimulated as men. Female porn is romance novels (and their accompanying movies), where those exact male tropes are very prominent. See, you don't even understand that a woman's attraction is largely mental/emotional...things a porno can't offer.

No, silly boy, it is "printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity, intended to stimulate erotic rather than aesthetic or emotional feelings.'Oh, right because we’re all up in that cheesy romance shit, right? Whatever, dude. I’m a woman and we talk.

Syne Wrote:Again, women don't know what they want, and evidence of that is their claim to want an equal while being hypergamous.

Or maybe…just maybe you aren’t as cool as you think you are because we don’t want to hurt your feelings. Peterson strikes me as man that received one too many attaboys from his mommy. Yeah, a proper sequel to this movie would have been to really tell you what we think.

You’re stronger but we’re living in the information age, deary. Peterson said that we’re only attracted to those that win status contests. Well then, we’ll all be lesbians within one generation because you guys aren’t keeping up. Hypergamy…my ass.
Reply
#15
You guys losing track of the hijacked verbal jousting threads? Like a bloody virus infection. I'm a guy, you know what I want?.. How about stopping the cat fighting or starting your own personal mind to mind combat thread.
Reply
#16
(Sep 24, 2018 08:34 PM)Zinjanthropos Wrote: You guys losing track of the hijacked verbal jousting threads? Like a bloody virus infection. I'm a guy, you know what I want?.. How about stopping the cat fighting or starting your own personal mind to mind combat thread.

You're right. Sorry.
Reply
#17
(Sep 24, 2018 08:57 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote:
(Sep 24, 2018 08:34 PM)Zinjanthropos Wrote: You guys losing track of the hijacked verbal jousting threads? Like a bloody virus infection. I'm a guy, you know what I want?.. How about stopping the cat fighting or starting your own personal mind to mind combat thread.

You're right. Sorry.

No problem.
Reply
#18
(Sep 24, 2018 08:34 PM)Zinjanthropos Wrote: You guys losing track of the hijacked verbal jousting threads? Like a bloody virus infection. I'm a guy, you know what I want?.. How about stopping the cat fighting or starting your own personal mind to mind combat thread.
Since SS started it, I'll let her be the one to stop her cross-contamination of topics.

In the meantime:
(Sep 24, 2018 07:39 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote: Wowee! That must have touched a little beta nerve. Lots of backpedaling there.  
Yet you can't show any backpedaling whatsoever. Dodgy
I can only assume the "touched a nerve" is projection. Rolleyes
Remember, I give what I get. Again, if you don't like it, control your own behavior.
Quote:
(Sep 24, 2018 01:12 AM)Syne Wrote: I've asked a few women, and sizing every man up for danger sounds paranoid by comparison.

I highly doubt that.

Paranoid? Really?
Doubt all you like, deary.
Yes, paranoid.
Quote:
(Mar 26, 2018 11:57 PM)Syne Wrote: When entering a new environment, people tend to look around a lot to assess any dangers or info they may need. They don't just dart their eyes around. They focus on each thing they see long enough to categorize its danger/usefulness.

An upside down man? Hmm…I can’t think of any uses for an upside down man. Well, maybe. I’m awfully creative.  Big Grin
Jeez, what are you on about now? Huh
The natural subconscious reaction to a new environment is very different from consciously sizing up every man you see for danger.
The former is uncontrolled and below the level of awareness, while the latter is paranoia.

And it's quite telling the variety and age of posts you feel you need to dig up to quell your cognitive dissonance. Rolleyes
Quote:
Syne Wrote:Wow, you really are an intellectually dishonest moron.

Uh..no, that would be you. Like I said, it’s almost word for word. Um…and there's still the time when you told me that you had academic training in psychology but that’s not true, is it, Syne? Watching Peterson’s YouTube videos doesn’t actually qualify as academic training.
Yet you haven't, and can't, quote examples that compare "almost word for word". They don't exist, so this is just another in your very long list of baseless ad hominems.
And even if some idea were similar, you'd be giving Peterson an awful lot of credit, that he could be the first human in history to come up with such ideas. And you'd be ignoring the fact that I haven't claimed any such ideas as novel to me...which seems to be the only thing that even could be intellectually dishonest in your accusations.

I've told you countless times that I never told you I was academically trained in psychology. You imagined that little nugget all on your own, and when your cognitive dissonance gets especially ripe, you go on a trolling bender about it. Get over it already. You made a mistaken assumption. So what.
Quote:
Syne Wrote:Why else would you need a "mythical male?"

I never said that 'I' did. I have what I want. I’ve already told you that several times. Do I feel like I need to defend my husband against your ill-founded assumptions? Nope.
Then quit whining about what "we want". Rolleyes
Quote:
Syne Wrote:Silly girl, female pornography largely isn't video (your own penchant for lesbian porn aside), because women aren't as visually stimulated as men. Female porn is romance novels (and their accompanying movies), where those exact male tropes are very prominent. See, you don't even understand that a woman's attraction is largely mental/emotional...things a porno can't offer.

No, silly boy, it is "printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity, intended to stimulate erotic rather than aesthetic or emotional feelings.'Oh, right because we’re all up in that cheesy romance shit, right? Whatever, dude. I’m a woman and we talk.
Yep, "printed ...material containing the explicit description...of sexual...activity". Or do you really think romance novels are all about the aesthetics? O_o
Romance novels are not akin to rom-coms or chick-flicks, except insofar as those genres intersect with Fifty Shades fare.
And as thoroughly established by now, we won't be trusting women on what they claim they're attracted to, much less mutually reinforcing their own fantasies and lack of personal awareness.
Quote:
Syne Wrote:Again, women don't know what they want, and evidence of that is their claim to want an equal while being hypergamous.

Or maybe…just maybe you aren’t as cool as you think you are because we don’t want to hurt your feelings. Peterson strikes me as man that received one too many attaboys from his mommy. Yeah, a proper sequel to this movie would have been to really tell you what we think.

You’re stronger but we’re living in the information age, deary. Peterson said that we’re only attracted to those that win status contests. Well then, we’ll all be lesbians within one generation because you guys aren’t keeping up. Hypergamy…my ass.
So, what, you've had sex with a guy to avoid hurting his feelings? O_o
Hey, that's on you.

Again, with the unsubstantiated ad hominems of Peterson (or any man) that only prove your preference of emotion over reason (and why guys don't want to be friends with you). Peterson seems to have a successful marriage.

What you really think is obviously just a shrieking emotional quelling of serious cognitive dissonance. A lizard-brain primordial tantrum for not getting your way.

As usual, you dismiss ubiquitous facts like hypergamy with zero counterargument.
And your lesbian fantasies are your own business. Just because you don't really like masculinity, doesn't say a thing about the vast majority of healthy women.
Reply
#19
At least I now know what men like myself  want...Peace on  Earth
Reply
#20
I just want the rats to go away before Mrs C2 finds out about them.
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)