Requesting to rejoin sciforums for the purposes of formal discussion

[C C]

 careful what you wish for.

I am extremely anxious to rejoin sciforums because I have a lot of knowledge to impart.

That's pretty much the barrier you face, though. Anything departing from what the SciForum establishment regards as proper science, philosophy, and politics will be judged as "preaching" if advertised / promoted in a monomaniacal manner. And even if the fixation isn't there, still doomed to be perma-banned eventually. Unless one is really good at evaluating when it's time to back-off off for a period and allow the negative-point numbers to subside. MR has endured over there for years by being self-aware of and disciplined at that (or at least having a native instinct for it).

~

[Ostronomos]

 careful what you wish for.

I am extremely anxious to rejoin sciforums because I have a lot of knowledge to impart.

That's pretty much the barrier you face, though. Anything departing from what the SciForum establishment regards as proper science, philosophy, and politics will be judged as "preaching" if advertised / promoted in a monomaniacal manner. And even if the fixation isn't there, still doomed to be perma-banned eventually. Unless one is really good at evaluating when it's time to back-off off for a period and allow the negative-point numbers to subside. MR has endured over there for years by being self-aware of and disciplined at that (or at least having a native instinct for it).

~

I suppose I could restrict my participation there to a less monomaniacal attitude. But remember I had my very own "Reality is..." thread which was dedicated to my insights. That should suffice as a way to contain the monomania. I am not faulting myself for monomania, rather I am considering all sides of the argument. I am appalled that there are a lot of ignorant people on sciforums, and while I possess the answers that will destroy their ignorance, I do not seek to be judged for preaching because I can back up my claims with logic.