Would the world be more peaceful if there were more women leaders?

[Secular Sanity]

Are there any modern, first-world matriarchies? Why not? Even women favor voting men into power.^
Are there any examples of minority rule? Of course there are...like minority rule by white South Africans during apartheid. How did that turn out?

Evolutionary psychology predisposes people to having certain expectations, motives, and strategies. Are these things, shaped by nature, unhealthy?
If evolution is generally a good thing that promotes good survival strategies, aren't most the consequences of that natural order healthy?

Jesus, Syne, you’re like a little kid that keeps bumping into walls. You’re going to get concussion if you’re not more careful.

It’s selection, not perfection.

[RainbowUnicorn]

Are there any modern, first-world matriarchies? Why not? Even women favor voting men into power.^
Are there any examples of minority rule? Of course there are...like minority rule by white South Africans during apartheid. How did that turn out?

Evolutionary psychology predisposes people to having certain expectations, motives, and strategies. Are these things, shaped by nature, unhealthy?
If evolution is generally a good thing that promotes good survival strategies, aren't most the consequences of that natural order healthy?

Jesus, Syne, you’re like a little kid that keeps bumping into walls. You’re going to get concussion if you’re not more careful.

It’s selection, not perfection.

spoilt & never learnt to compromise, lacks ability to empathise ideologically or intellectually & renders things down to the simplist form to the self to re-define the debate & attempt to use subconsciouse bullying to force a prejorative sub context ?

is that what you were leaning toward ?

[Secular Sanity]

is that what you were leaning toward ?

No. I was leaning more towards a dumb(_!_).

[RainbowUnicorn]

is that what you were leaning toward ?

No.  I was leaning more towards a dumb(_!_).  

 

...Would the world be more peaceful if there were more women leaders?

[url=https://www.scivillage.com/thread-4420.html][/url]
if we could leap frog civilisation forward 100 years would we have a more peaceful society & what role would women play in that ?

i wonder why soo many men are afraid of women leaders ?

[Secular Sanity]

is that what you were leaning toward ?

No.  I was leaning more towards a dumb(_!_).  

 

...Would the world be more peaceful if there were more women leaders?

if we could leap frog civilisation forward 100 years would we have a more peaceful society & what role would women play in that ?

i wonder why soo many men are afraid of women leaders ?

Well, I call it like I see it.

What are trying to say, RU? Are you penalizing me for not being nice? Was that too abrasive for a female?

[Syne]

Are there any modern, first-world matriarchies? Why not? Even women favor voting men into power.^
Are there any examples of minority rule? Of course there are...like minority rule by white South Africans during apartheid. How did that turn out?

Evolutionary psychology predisposes people to having certain expectations, motives, and strategies. Are these things, shaped by nature, unhealthy?
If evolution is generally a good thing that promotes good survival strategies, aren't most the consequences of that natural order healthy?

Jesus, Syne, you’re like a little kid that keeps bumping into walls. You’re going to get concussion if you’re not more careful.

It’s selection, not perfection.

I knew I should have predicted the stupid straw man arguments.

I made an appeal to survival. An appeal to nature requires the only reason for something being good is that it is natural. So yeah, you once again made an ass of yourself while trying to troll.

And where did anyone say anything about perfection? O_o

spoilt & never learnt to compromise, lacks ability to empathise ideologically or intellectually & renders things down to the simplist form to the self to re-define the debate & attempt to use subconsciouse bullying to force a prejorative sub context ?

is that what you were leaning toward ?

Bullying? Once again, your projection says much more about your own insecurities than anything I've actual said.
Prey tell, where have you compromised or empathized beyond your own ideological bias? O_o

---

soo you think i am not aware of your sadistic feelings for LGBTQ and other people to suffer for whom they are ?
You think i missed that during your many posts ?
Your whimsical inferance to personal choices and the consequences that you elude to almost in code ?
quite sadistic really... it gives you some type of solice for your position i guess.
as in kind it was YOU who brought up the death penalty in your sentence

"some things as healthy consequences of natural order."

your semi self coded literal gesticulation typed with almost a smirk i would guess.

you think i missed that ?
nope.
you think you baited me ?

What does any of your persecution complex have to do with the death penalty...or even women as leaders?

You're obviously delusional and inferring things never written nor implied. But that's what extremists have to do to maintain their overwhelmingly biased views.

But since you bring it up...

Why would "some things as healthy consequences of natural order" offend an LGBT person so much? Is it the word "healthy" that triggered you? How on earth does "healthy" imply the death penalty? O_o

The only way I can fathom has to do with disease, but certainly you wouldn't be claiming that association, as if the shoe fits, completely unprompted....would you?

You're baseless assumptions are FAR more tell of you than me.

What happened, RU? Couldn't support your accusations? Couldn't even answer a few simple questions?

[Zinjanthropos]

Three words guaranteed to get female blood boiling and preparing for war. Keep these words out of the political arena and women will do better than men at keeping the peace. Guaranteed. The words are:

  Attention K-Mart Shoppers  

[Syne]

I could probably think of a few more words that would do the trick...especially when said in person.

[RainbowUnicorn]

is that what you were leaning toward ?

No.  I was leaning more towards a dumb(_!_).  

 

...Would the world be more peaceful if there were more women leaders?

if we could leap frog civilisation forward 100 years would we have a more peaceful society & what role would women play in that ?

i wonder why soo many men are afraid of women leaders ?

Well, I call it like I see it.

What are trying to say, RU?  Are you penalizing me for not being nice?  Was that too abrasive for a female?

LoL
i thought you were holding back
you raise an excellent point regarding gender bias at a nurture & deeply seated cultural level RE abrasiveness.
men are expected to not be caring(like syne)
while women are expected t be all soft & mooshy so as not to hurt the tiny babys...[pan-handling the predator]

i find it all quite sycophantically serial killer really.
maybe we can look at gender stereo types in the usa as an indicator of mass shootings & gun culture & the death penalty.
more guns more violence
more death penalty more crime
the stats all show it but the people refuse to accept it.
this clearly indicates a level of brain washing that goes along with religous brainwashing which has heavy emphasis on gender stereo types.
just because the media is able to circulate LGBTQ issues does not mean the majority of US society is accepting of gender neutral civil rights.
the predation on women is seen as a cultural emperative by many religions and a majority of society.

when broardway is making the mysoginist millions, the mysoginist will not oppose broardway publicly or ecconomically.
money 1st
religion 2nd
anti moral collective equity 3rd

[Zinjanthropos]

Put all the leaders' brains in jars, let them run their respective countries from inside the glass and then tell me when they make a male or female decision.