Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Would the world be more peaceful if there were more women leaders?

#31
Syne Offline
Not really. Both could endless lecture each other on manors, like Carol used to around here, and all we'd be able to glean is that they really do want the socialist utopia...at any cost to freedom.
Reply
#32
Secular Sanity Offline
(Nov 2, 2017 06:37 AM)Syne Wrote: You know, instead of just accepting some things as healthy consequences of natural order.

What do you mean by 'natural order'?
Reply
#33
Zinjanthropos Offline
(Nov 6, 2017 09:41 PM)Syne Wrote: Not really. Both could endless lecture each other on manors, like Carol used to around here, and all we'd be able to glean is that they really do want the socialist utopia...at any cost to freedom.

My wife and her fem buddies really do lecture each other about manors, er ...manners too. Smile My sisters would fight, each other that is, otherwise they were pacifist (pass a fist- coincidental). One battle in particular when my younger sister wore something from her older sister's closet (they are 2 years apart) that hadn't been worn in 3 years by anybody. Hair pulling, scratching, kicking etc that only ended when my father stepped in. My mom had no luck stopping it, does that mean anything? I doubt it but maybe someone could fund a study to find out. How do fathers feel sending their daughters off to war?
Reply
#34
Syne Offline
(Nov 6, 2017 10:30 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote:
(Nov 2, 2017 06:37 AM)Syne Wrote: You know, instead of just accepting some things as healthy consequences of natural order.

What do you mean by 'natural order'?
Evolution...evolutionary psychology...you know, the definition of the words "natural" and "order".

(Nov 6, 2017 11:31 PM)Zinjanthropos Wrote:
(Nov 6, 2017 09:41 PM)Syne Wrote: Not really. Both could endless lecture each other on manors, like Carol used to around here, and all we'd be able to glean is that they really do want the socialist utopia...at any cost to freedom.

My wife and her fem buddies really do lecture each other about manors, er ...manners too. Smile My sisters would fight, each other that is, otherwise they were pacifist (pass a fist- coincidental). One battle in particular when my younger sister wore something from her older sister's closet (they are 2 years apart) that hadn't been worn in 3 years by anybody. Hair pulling, scratching, kicking etc that only ended when my father stepped in. My mom had no luck stopping it, does that mean anything? I doubt it but maybe someone could fund a study to find out. How do fathers feel sending their daughters off to war?

Yeah, a lot of debate over MTV Cribs. Wink
Reply
#35
Secular Sanity Offline
(Nov 2, 2017 06:37 AM)Syne Wrote: Why does it invariably need to become a matriarchy...or black power...or eat the rich...? Invariably, whatever group claims victimhood is eager to victimize in return. You know, instead of just accepting some things as healthy consequences of natural order.

Hmm...I don't want to misinterpret your point here.  What exactly is it that you're trying to say?
Reply
#36
Magical Realist Offline
Quote:You know, instead of just accepting some things as healthy consequences of natural order.

What healthy consequences of natural order do you mean?
Reply
#37
Syne Offline
(Nov 7, 2017 03:03 AM)Secular Sanity Wrote:
(Nov 2, 2017 06:37 AM)Syne Wrote: Why does it invariably need to become a matriarchy...or black power...or eat the rich...? Invariably, whatever group claims victimhood is eager to victimize in return. You know, instead of just accepting some things as healthy consequences of natural order.

Hmm...I don't want to misinterpret your point here.  What exactly is it that you're trying to say?

(Nov 7, 2017 03:23 AM)Magical Realist Wrote:
Quote:You know, instead of just accepting some things as healthy consequences of natural order.

What healthy consequences of natural order do you mean?

Is simple English really that hard to decipher?

Maybe it'd be easier if both of you describe your understandings, since it already seems pretty clear to me.
Do you need a primer on evolutionary psychology?
Reply
#38
Magical Realist Offline
(Nov 7, 2017 05:52 AM)Syne Wrote:
(Nov 7, 2017 03:03 AM)Secular Sanity Wrote:
(Nov 2, 2017 06:37 AM)Syne Wrote: Why does it invariably need to become a matriarchy...or black power...or eat the rich...? Invariably, whatever group claims victimhood is eager to victimize in return. You know, instead of just accepting some things as healthy consequences of natural order.

Hmm...I don't want to misinterpret your point here.  What exactly is it that you're trying to say?

(Nov 7, 2017 03:23 AM)Magical Realist Wrote:
Quote:You know, instead of just accepting some things as healthy consequences of natural order.

What healthy consequences of natural order do you mean?

Is simple English really that hard to decipher?

Maybe it'd be easier if both of you describe your understandings, since it already seems pretty clear to me.
Do you need a primer on evolutionary psychology?

You can't even explain what you mean? You're an idiot. Don't waste my time.
Reply
#39
Syne Offline
Okay, time to spoon feed the little trolling baby bird. Rolleyes

(Nov 2, 2017 06:37 AM)Syne Wrote: Why does it invariably need to become a matriarchy...or black power...or eat the rich...? Invariably, whatever group claims victimhood is eager to victimize in return. You know, instead of just accepting some things as healthy consequences of natural order.

Are there any modern, first-world matriarchies? Why not? Even women favor voting men into power.^
Are there any examples of minority rule? Of course there are...like minority rule by white South Africans during apartheid. How did that turn out?

Evolutionary psychology predisposes people to having certain expectations, motives, and strategies. Are these things, shaped by nature, unhealthy?
If evolution is generally a good thing that promotes good survival strategies, aren't most the consequences of that natural order healthy?
Reply
#40
RainbowUnicorn Offline
(Nov 7, 2017 07:23 AM)Magical Realist Wrote:
(Nov 7, 2017 05:52 AM)Syne Wrote:
(Nov 7, 2017 03:03 AM)Secular Sanity Wrote:
(Nov 2, 2017 06:37 AM)Syne Wrote: Why does it invariably need to become a matriarchy...or black power...or eat the rich...? Invariably, whatever group claims victimhood is eager to victimize in return. You know, instead of just accepting some things as healthy consequences of natural order.

Hmm...I don't want to misinterpret your point here.  What exactly is it that you're trying to say?

(Nov 7, 2017 03:23 AM)Magical Realist Wrote:
Quote:You know, instead of just accepting some things as healthy consequences of natural order.

What healthy consequences of natural order do you mean?

Is simple English really that hard to decipher?

Maybe it'd be easier if both of you describe your understandings, since it already seems pretty clear to me.
Do you need a primer on evolutionary psychology?

You can't even explain what you mean? You're an idiot. Don't waste my time.

...
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Research Murdered pregnant women & abortion? + Black women murdered 6 times more than White C C 1 87 Feb 10, 2024 12:47 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Transgender women may be more likely to have type 2 diabetes than cisgender women C C 1 104 Dec 1, 2021 01:17 AM
Last Post: Syne
  How do leaders emerge? + Disadvantaged may support social hierarchies & inequality C C 0 80 Aug 3, 2021 07:39 PM
Last Post: C C
  (UK) Why there is there such anger over the pay offer to nurses? This is why C C 0 139 Mar 10, 2021 10:56 PM
Last Post: C C
  What women really want + Gender study finds 90% of people are biased against women C C 0 210 Mar 7, 2020 01:29 AM
Last Post: C C
  What Would the World Look Like if There Were Only 100 People? C C 1 273 Jun 11, 2017 09:45 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)