Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Panentheism

#31
Secular Sanity Offline
(Sep 26, 2017 03:30 AM)Syne Wrote: And don't think I didn't notice you ignore the fact that you went from accusing trolling to lying and never support either.

When you showed up at Sciforums, I asked you privately, if you were so-and-so at physforum because your writing style was similar.  You said, no.  Later, I noticed that RC brought it up in a discussion with Tach at Sciforums.  You didn't deny it during that discussion. Maybe because RP was in the conversation, as well.  I thought it was odd, but I understood that there was no obligation to divulge that information to me.

You also said in a PM here that you're a professional therapist.  Is that true?

(Sep 26, 2017 04:50 AM)Syne Wrote: Wow, SS hasn't made an on-topic post since half way down the second page. Instead she's devolved into pure personal attack.

At least RU and MR stayed in the ballpark of on-topic, even if that's just their fall-back anti-religious sentiment. Props guys.

Don't play the victim, Syne.  You're usually the instigator when comes to personal attacks.
Reply
#32
Syne Offline
(Sep 26, 2017 04:13 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote:
(Sep 26, 2017 03:30 AM)Syne Wrote: And don't think I didn't notice you ignore the fact that you went from accusing trolling to lying and never support either.

When you showed up at Sciforums, I asked you privately, if you were so-and-so at physforum because your writing style was similar.  You said, no.  Later, I noticed that RC brought it up in a discussion with Tach at Sciforums.  You didn't deny it during that discussion. Maybe because RP was in the conversation, as well.  I thought it was odd, but I understood that there was no obligation to divulge that information to me.

You also said in a PM here that you're a professional therapist.  Is that true?
Wow, now you're lying, in a vain attempt to support your hypocritical accusation of lying. How sad.

Quote:
(Sep 26, 2017 04:50 AM)Syne Wrote: Wow, SS hasn't made an on-topic post since half way down the second page. Instead she's devolved into pure personal attack.

At least RU and MR stayed in the ballpark of on-topic, even if that's just their fall-back anti-religious sentiment. Props guys.

Don't play the victim, Syne.  You're usually the instigator when comes to personal attacks.

What, can't be bothered to go reread the actual thread? Figures.

But if you really want to prove yourself more than a lazy troll (page and a half so far), you're always free to go pick up the productive part of our discussion you completely abandoned to level your paltry trolling accusation. https://www.scivillage.com/thread-4225-p...l#pid13897
Reply
#33
Secular Sanity Offline
(Sep 27, 2017 12:00 AM)Syne Wrote: Wow, now you're lying, in a vain attempt to support your hypocritical accusation of lying. How sad.

Nope. It was when we were discussing schizophrenia.  What did you say then regarding your education and training in that area?

Why wouldn't I think you're trolling when you excessively cry ad hominem here, fallacy there, but then head straight for a fallacy in informal logic—an argument from ignorance?
Reply
#34
Syne Offline
(Sep 27, 2017 03:55 AM)Secular Sanity Wrote:
(Sep 27, 2017 12:00 AM)Syne Wrote: Wow, now you're lying, in a vain attempt to support your hypocritical accusation of lying. How sad.

Nope. It was when we were discussing schizophrenia.  What did you say then regarding your education and training in that area?

Then show me, liar. Rolleyes

Go ahead. I'll wait.

Quote:Why wouldn't I think you're trolling when you excessively cry ad hominem here, fallacy there, but then head straight for a fallacy in informal logic—an argument from ignorance?

Is opinion argument? No. An argument has the intent to potentially persuade, which is why fallacies matter in arguments. Opinions are just expressions of belief.

Now show where I've used a fallacy in an actual argument (aside from equal response to ad hominem). You know, instead of things that I freely admit are not compelling nor convincing.

Go ahead. I'll wait.
Reply
#35
Secular Sanity Offline
(Sep 27, 2017 04:12 AM)Syne Wrote:
(Sep 27, 2017 03:55 AM)Secular Sanity Wrote: It was when we were discussing schizophrenia.  What did you say then regarding your education and training in that area?

Then show me, liar.  Rolleyes

Go ahead. I'll wait.

I don't care about what everyone else thinks.  I care about what I think.  Just answer the question.  What did you say to me in a PM regarding your education and training in that area?  Do you even remember?  Did you save it?
Reply
#36
Syne Offline
(Sep 27, 2017 12:18 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote:
(Sep 27, 2017 04:12 AM)Syne Wrote:
(Sep 27, 2017 03:55 AM)Secular Sanity Wrote: It was when we were discussing schizophrenia.  What did you say then regarding your education and training in that area?

Then show me, liar.  Rolleyes

Go ahead. I'll wait.

I don't care about what everyone else thinks.  I care about what I think.  Just answer the question.  What did you say to me in a PM regarding your education and training in that area?  Do you even remember?  Did you save it?

Of course I don't remember an insignificant discussion that happened who knows how long ago (years?). And no, why on earth would I save some nonsense from you? Unlike you, I'm not a troll that saves/bookmarks things so I can try to twist them to use against someone YEARS later. Rolleyes
I certainly never said I was a "professional therapist". So QUIT LYING. Dodgy

And no, I don't have to remember the actual discussion to know that. That's the benefit of always being sincere...no lies to keep track of.
Reply
#37
Secular Sanity Offline
(Sep 27, 2017 04:11 PM)Syne Wrote: Of course I don't remember an insignificant discussion that happened who knows how long ago (years?). And no, why on earth would I save some nonsense from you? Unlike you, I'm not a troll that saves/bookmarks things so I can try to twist them to use against someone YEARS later.  Rolleyes
I certainly never said I was a "professional therapist". So QUIT LYING.  Dodgy

And no, I don't have to remember the actual discussion to know that. That's the benefit of always being sincere...no lies to keep track of.


You’re still avoiding the question?  

Do you have an academic background or a degree in psychology, sociology, behavioral science, or any other related field?
Reply
#38
Syne Offline
(Sep 27, 2017 09:49 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote:
(Sep 27, 2017 04:11 PM)Syne Wrote: Of course I don't remember an insignificant discussion that happened who knows how long ago (years?). And no, why on earth would I save some nonsense from you? Unlike you, I'm not a troll that saves/bookmarks things so I can try to twist them to use against someone YEARS later.  Rolleyes
I certainly never said I was a "professional therapist". So QUIT LYING.  Dodgy

And no, I don't have to remember the actual discussion to know that. That's the benefit of always being sincere...no lies to keep track of.


You’re still avoiding the question?  

Do you have an academic background or a degree in psychology, sociology, behavioral science, or any other related field?

I just told you, "I certainly never said I was a "professional therapist". Now you can quit trolling with all your obvious lies.

Apparently I hit a major nerve...since you've hypocritically become the worst example of what you accused me of, just to avoid answering ANY on-topic questions. Rolleyes
Reply
#39
Secular Sanity Offline
(Sep 27, 2017 11:37 PM)Syne Wrote:
(Sep 27, 2017 09:49 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote: You’re still avoiding the question?  

Do you have an academic background or a degree in psychology, sociology, behavioral science, or any other related field?

I just told you, "I certainly never said I was a "professional therapist". Now you can quit trolling with all your obvious lies.

Thank you.

That's all I needed to know.
Reply
#40
Syne Offline
Oh, I see. I just had to say it twice for the troll to quit.
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)