Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Panentheism

#21
Syne Offline
(Sep 21, 2017 03:39 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote: (The most essential part of trolling is convincing someone that you truly believe in what you are saying, no matter how outrageous.) 

It was nice meeting you, Syne.  Take care.  I'm out.

You can always tell when I've hit too close to home when SS cries some ad hominem and runs home. Big Grin
Reply
#22
Secular Sanity Offline
(Sep 21, 2017 06:36 PM)Syne Wrote: I'm not trolling, so quit projecting. This is just your typical ad hominem defense to avoid questions and reasoning that makes you doubt yourself. You obviously can't refute the facts I've stated.

If you’re truly not trolling then I’m forced to admit that I was wrong.

(Sep 21, 2017 04:53 AM)Syne Wrote: Have you ever learned something that forced you to abandon something you were previously certain was true?

Yes. I thought you were smarter than that.  I really-really thought you were smarter than that.

There’s nothing left to say now.  I’m giving up.  Sad
Reply
#23
Syne Offline
(Sep 23, 2017 04:31 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote: If you’re truly not trolling then I’m forced to admit that I was wrong.
When have I ever been anything but earnest? I won't be holding my breath for you to admit you are wrong.
Quote:
(Sep 21, 2017 04:53 AM)Syne Wrote: Have you ever learned something that forced you to abandon something you were previously certain was true?

Yes. I thought you were smarter than that.  I really-really thought you were smarter than that.

There’s nothing left to say now.  I’m giving up.  Sad

Oops. I thought you were smart enough to realize it wasn't just a yes or no question. An example of your own experience could be used as an analogy to help you understand. But that clearly doesn't interest you.

So the feigned interest implied by "Kind of [want to discuss transcendence] because I don't understand it" was probably just trolling. Yeah, lazy people are often quick to give up.
Reply
#24
Secular Sanity Offline
(Sep 23, 2017 05:33 PM)Syne Wrote: When have I ever been anything but earnest? I won't be holding my breath for you to admit you are wrong.

Well, I have seen you lie before when asked about your previous moniker.  

Syne Wrote:So the feigned interest implied by "Kind of [want to discuss transcendence] because I don't understand it" was probably just trolling. Yeah, lazy people are often quick to give up.

No, Syne, it’s not that.  It’s your appeal to ignorance.  The God of the gaps is something we’ll never see eye to eye on.
Reply
#25
Syne Offline
(Sep 23, 2017 06:55 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote:
(Sep 23, 2017 05:33 PM)Syne Wrote: When have I ever been anything but earnest? I won't be holding my breath for you to admit you are wrong.

Well, I have seen you lie before when asked about your previous moniker.  

Yep, not holding my breath. Now you've moved your own goal post from trolling to lying. And lying about what previous moniker? Show me.
Quote:
Syne Wrote:So the feigned interest implied by "Kind of [want to discuss transcendence] because I don't understand it" was probably just trolling. Yeah, lazy people are often quick to give up.

No, Syne, it’s not that.  It’s your appeal to ignorance.  The God of the gaps is something we’ll never see eye to eye on.

LOL! Just another in your ever-growing list of ad hominems used expressly to avoid and distract. Did I mention your lazy arguments? Rolleyes
Reply
#26
Secular Sanity Offline
(Sep 23, 2017 07:02 PM)Syne Wrote: Now you've moved your own goal post from trolling to lying. And lying about what previous moniker? Show me.

Unfortunately, Poe's law is something that I've always struggled with.

Syne Wrote:LOL! Just another in your ever-growing list of ad hominems used expressly to avoid and distract. Did I mention your lazy arguments?  Rolleyes

Now, that is the pot calling the kettle black.
Reply
#27
Syne Offline
(Sep 25, 2017 02:41 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote:
(Sep 23, 2017 07:02 PM)Syne Wrote: Now you've moved your own goal post from trolling to lying. And lying about what previous moniker? Show me.

Unfortunately, Poe's law is something that I've always struggled with.
Apparently so is vocabulary. Rolleyes
Quote:
Syne Wrote:LOL! Just another in your ever-growing list of ad hominems used expressly to avoid and distract. Did I mention your lazy arguments?  Rolleyes

Now, that is the pot calling the kettle black.

Except I never avoid an argument. Rolleyes
Reply
#28
Secular Sanity Offline
(Sep 25, 2017 06:27 PM)Syne Wrote: Except I never avoid an argument.  Rolleyes

True, but they're often unsupported.
Reply
#29
Syne Offline
(Sep 26, 2017 12:03 AM)Secular Sanity Wrote:
(Sep 25, 2017 06:27 PM)Syne Wrote: Except I never avoid an argument.  Rolleyes

True, but they're often unsupported.

Again, where? Show me. Should be easy if it's truly "often".

Your unwillingness to accept the support of an argument is not the same as unsupported. But you'd have to have some self-awareness to realize that.  Rolleyes



And don't think I didn't notice you ignore the fact that you went from accusing trolling to lying and never support either.
Reply
#30
Syne Offline
Wow, SS hasn't made an on-topic post since half way down the second page. Instead she's devolved into pure personal attack.

At least RU and MR stayed in the ballpark of on-topic, even if that's just their fall-back anti-religious sentiment. Props guys.
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)