Iran thinks the US will let it keep the Strait of Hormuz

#1
C C Offline
SUMMARY: If Trump had gotten out of this conflict within the six weeks max as originally claimed, he would have just been viewed as an arrogant azzo who messed up traffic through the Strait and then aloofly left. But by hanging around to fix it he's now going to be deemed both that and the loser who ultimately facilitated Iran's formally recognized, official control over the passage. (When this dawdling, ineffectual strategy and its forces finally pull out due to exhaustion of resources and the unpopularity of the war -- whether with or without an agreement.)
- - - - - - - - - - - - -

Iran thinks the US will let it keep the Strait of Hormuz
https://apnews.com/article/iran-us-war-s...b0aa1c5c3f

EXCERPTS: They are betting that military pressure will ultimately force the United States to accept their control over the crucial waterway for global energy — and that time is on their side.

They know about the diminishing stockpiles of key U.S. weapons such as advanced missile interceptors. They know the war is deeply unpopular with Americans. They know that as long as the strait is largely closed, the price of gas and other goods will stay high ahead of U.S. congressional elections in November. They know that trying to open it by force would be costly and may require American ground troops. They know their Houthi allies in Yemen could widen the war and disrupt another major trade route.

By that logic, U.S. President Donald Trump has no choice but to capitulate.

[...] Iran says it is close to reaching a deal with Oman to manage the strait, which runs between the countries. But on Saturday, Tehran said the strait will not open until the U.S. “corrects its behavior,” saying it must permanently end the war, lift its naval blockade of Iranian ports and withdraw its military from the area. It also must “completely compensate” Iran for war damage, lift sanctions and “unconditionally” release frozen assets.

There was no White House comment. A deal with Oman would formalize Tehran’s control over what had been an open international waterway before the war, one that carried a fifth of the world’s traded oil and gas.

[...] Abdolreza Davari, an analyst who once advised former President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, said Iran’s effective control of the strait has given it leverage with the U.S. and regional countries that can help guarantee its security.

“More than revenue from the strait, Iran wants to confirm its management and sovereignty over the strait,” he said by phone from Tehran. Formal control over even part of the strait would be a clear win for Iran and a loss for the U.S., which has yet to accomplish some of its various and shifting goals in the war.
Reply
#2
geordief Offline
(7 hours ago)C C Wrote: SUMMARY: If Trump had gotten out of this conflict within the six weeks max as originally claimed, he would have just been viewed as an arrogant azzo who messed up traffic through the Strait and then aloofly left. But by hanging around to fix it he's now going to be deemed both that and the loser who ultimately facilitated Iran's formally recognized, official control over the passage. (When this dawdling, ineffectual strategy and its forces finally pull out due to exhaustion of resources and the unpopularity of the war -- whether with or without an agreement.)
- - - - - - - - - - - - -

Iran thinks the US will let it keep the Strait of Hormuz
https://apnews.com/article/iran-us-war-s...b0aa1c5c3f

EXCERPTS: They are betting that military pressure will ultimately force the United States to accept their control over the crucial waterway for global energy — and that time is on their side.

They know about the diminishing stockpiles of key U.S. weapons such as advanced missile interceptors. They know the war is deeply unpopular with Americans. They know that as long as the strait is largely closed, the price of gas and other goods will stay high ahead of U.S. congressional elections in November. They know that trying to open it by force would be costly and may require American ground troops. They know their Houthi allies in Yemen could widen the war and disrupt another major trade route.

By that logic, U.S. President Donald Trump has no choice but to capitulate.

[...] Iran says it is close to reaching a deal with Oman to manage the strait, which runs between the countries. But on Saturday, Tehran said the strait will not open until the U.S. “corrects its behavior,” saying it must permanently end the war, lift its naval blockade of Iranian ports and withdraw its military from the area. It also must “completely compensate” Iran for war damage, lift sanctions and “unconditionally” release frozen assets.

There was no White House comment. A deal with Oman would formalize Tehran’s control over what had been an open international waterway before the war, one that carried a fifth of the world’s traded oil and gas.

[...] Abdolreza Davari, an analyst who once advised former President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, said Iran’s effective control of the strait has given it leverage with the U.S. and regional countries that can help guarantee its security.

“More than revenue from the strait, Iran wants to confirm its management and sovereignty over the strait,” he said by phone from Tehran. Formal control over even part of the strait would be a clear win for Iran and a loss for the U.S., which has yet to accomplish some of its various and shifting goals in the war.
I was wondering if there had been American pressure on Oman  to prevent it from going along with any kind of joint agreement with Iran over the Straits.

Is Oman too wealthy to be amenable to any bribery from Trump?

Has it cast in its lot with Iran because it has lost faith that the US can protect them against attacks from Iran if it continues to support American policy in the region?
Reply
#3
C C Offline
(7 hours ago)geordief Wrote: I was wondering if there had been American pressure on Oman  to prevent it from going along with any kind of joint agreement with Iran over the Straits.

Is Oman too wealthy to be amenable to any bribery from Trump?

Has it cast in its lot with Iran because it has lost faith that the US can protect them against attacks from Iran if it continues to support American policy in the region?

Trump has intermittently placed pressure on Oman for various things over the months. But the latest (a few days ago) was ironically to get Oman to concede to allowing Iran to have impermanent control of the Strait. Of course, these tentative negotiations have apparently broken down this weekend (like all the countless others) as Iran has once again returned to its usual bevy of demands. The idiotic dog chasing its tail show continues.

Trump officials pressure Oman to accept Iran’s terms on the Strait of Hormuz, says diplomat: A senior Middle East diplomat with direct knowledge of the talks between Iran and Oman told MS NOW on Tuesday that the U.S. and Europe are placing a great deal of pressure on Oman to accept a temporary agreement with Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The senior Middle East diplomat told MS NOW on Monday that the current version of the temporary agreement, if finalized, would give Iran temporary control of both the inward and outward routes ships would use to sail through the strait.
Reply
#4
geordief Offline
(6 hours ago)C C Wrote:
(7 hours ago)geordief Wrote: I was wondering if there had been American pressure on Oman  to prevent it from going along with any kind of joint agreement with Iran over the Straits.
--‐-‐---‐--‐
‐‐----‐-----

But the latest (a few days ago) was ironically to get Oman to concede to allowing Iran to have impermanent control of the Strai

A surprise to me (obviously not following events closely enough)

Was any rationale given for that intervention?

( I note the use of "impermanent".That must be a clue ,I guess.)

A play for time?
Reply
#5
C C Offline
(6 hours ago)geordief Wrote:
(6 hours ago)C C Wrote:
(7 hours ago)geordief Wrote: I was wondering if there had been American pressure on Oman  to prevent it from going along with any kind of joint agreement with Iran over the Straits.
--‐-‐---‐--‐
‐‐----‐-----

But the latest (a few days ago) was ironically to get Oman to concede to allowing Iran to have impermanent control of the Strait

A surprise to me (obviously not following events closely enough)

Was any rationale given for that intervention?

( I note the use of "impermanent".That must be a clue ,I guess.)

A play for time?

Giving the dog a bone to coax it and all parties into another ceasefire and reload of the previous pointless negotiations that always went nowhere.

U.S. nears Hormuz deal: "Trump aims to give temporary control of the Strait of Hormuz to Iran as part of a diplomatic effort to resume negotiations over a nuclear deal and establish a ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran. This arrangement is intended to reduce tensions and prevent further military conflict in the region."
Reply
#6
geordief Offline
(6 hours ago)C C Wrote:
(6 hours ago)geordief Wrote:
(6 hours ago)C C Wrote:
(7 hours ago)geordief Wrote: I was wondering if there had been American pressure on Oman  to prevent it from going along with any kind of joint agreement with Iran over the Straits.
--‐-‐---‐--‐
‐‐----‐-----

But the latest (a few days ago) was ironically to get Oman to concede to allowing Iran to have impermanent control of the Strait

A surprise to me (obviously not following events closely enough)

Was any rationale given for that intervention?

( I note the use of "impermanent".That must be a clue ,I guess.)

A play for time?

Giving the dog a bone to coax it and all parties into another ceasefire and reload of the previous pointless negotiations that always went nowhere.

U.S. nears Hormuz deal: "Trump aims to give temporary control of the Strait of Hormuz to Iran as part of a diplomatic effort to resume negotiations over a nuclear deal and establish a ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran. This arrangement is intended to reduce tensions and prevent further military conflict in the region."
 Trump wants to threaten force to 
strengthen  his bargaining hand  but some in Iran are happy with martyrdom   and others think his threats are hollow.

Both factions are happy to hold the Iranian people hostage to their own designs.

Some pathetic retired Bush administration General (or similar) was bleating tonight to the BBC interviewer  about the UK not transporting the boats through the Straits and that the "Special Relationship" was not being honoured.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article The proposed "real reason" that Israel attacked Iran C C 93 14,517 Apr 15, 2026 02:20 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Article ‘Seems like losing’: What the US hasn’t won in Iran? C C 1 260 Apr 9, 2026 02:50 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Iran war bedevils J.D. Vance and Marco Rubio's jockeying for 2028 C C 0 254 Mar 15, 2026 09:29 PM
Last Post: C C
  Soldiers told Trump's war in Iran will bring about Jesus' Second Coming Magical Realist 23 1,346 Mar 8, 2026 03:51 AM
Last Post: Syne
  What Grok the AI Thinks is the Most Uncomfortable Truth about Humans Yazata 3 315 Jan 13, 2026 05:45 PM
Last Post: Secular Sanity
  Article Jimmy Carter might have saved the climate, if the country had let him try? C C 0 514 Dec 31, 2024 09:19 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Space is dead. Why do we keep writing about it? (anti-space campaign) C C 0 465 Oct 28, 2024 07:34 PM
Last Post: C C
  (UK) Labour food pledge to woo farmers + Iran: 'UK role evident in Israel war crimes' C C 0 568 Jan 1, 2024 12:51 AM
Last Post: C C
  In the next pandemic, let’s pay people to get vaccinated C C 0 441 Jan 12, 2023 01:41 AM
Last Post: C C
  West now thinks Ukraine could prevail + Noise of the bye din grows or just hyperbole? C C 0 512 May 1, 2022 05:42 AM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)