Trump's "white genocide" TV ambush fails..

#1
Magical Realist Offline
And this is why we should never elect conspiracy theory believers for President..

"We knew he was a bore and boor. Now we have learned that Donald Trump is an honorary Boer.

When he turned his attention to South Africa on Wednesday, it may come as no surprise that the US president – who has been sued for discriminating against Black apartment seekers, called for the death penalty for the Central Park Five, pushed the false claim that Barack Obama was born in Kenya, referred to Haiti and African nations as “shithole countries”, and blamed an air crash on DEI – was rooting for the whites.

Trump had laid a trap for South African president Cyril Ramaphosa in his gold and gaudy Oval Office. After 20 minutes of relative pleasantries, Trump’s delusion that a white genocide is happening in South Africa inevitably reared its ugly head.


Ramaphosa said “listening to the stories” of South Africans would help his counterpart better understand. But then, with his audience captive, Trump turned sinister and ordered his staff to dim the lights and activate a big screen. He was like a Bond villain startling guests with noxious gas or a doomsday machine.

Natalie Harp, a White House aide known as the “human printer” because she prints out favourable newspaper cuttings for Trump’s attention, swung into action. She plugged a laptop in the TV and played a video that showed South African opposition politicians Jacob Zuma and Julius Malema singing apartheid-era songs about shooting Boers, a term that refers to farmers or Afrikaners.

Then came drone footage purportedly showing Afrikaner graves marked by white crosses. Then Trump brandished a sheaf of newspaper cuttings about recent killings in South Africa, muttering bleakly: “Death, death, death, horrible death.” Between the two men loomed a bust of Winston Churchill, who covered the Boer war as a reporter and was held as a prisoner in Pretoria.

Poor Ramaphosa had to sit and take it as the terrible truth dawned: he had been Zelenskyy’d. The last time Trump pulled an ambush like this, his weapon was the vice-president, JD Vance, bullying and berating the leader of Ukraine.


This time, Vance was content to remain silent, wearing an absurdly long red tie and glowering with menace like an attack dog straining at the leash. Joining him on the sofa were defence secretary Pete Hegseth, looking gormless, and commerce secretary Howard Lutnick, looking smug. Behind them stood South African-born billionaire Elon Musk, brimming variously with boredom and contempt.

But Ramaphosa had learned lessons from Trump’s attempt to turn diplomacy into a reality TV series. France’s Emmanuel Macron, Britain’s Keir Starmer and Canada’s Mark Carney have all run the gauntlet of the TV cameras in the Oval Office, expertly serving up a sycophancy sandwich that combines craven flattery with a bit of gristle in the middle – a willingness to stick up for their own country.

Moreover, Ramaphosa knows Trump’s type and was not going to be intimidated by white supremacy. He was born to a police sergeant and a domestic worker and grew up under the violent regime of racial apartheid. He was arrested after leading a student protest at college and served 11 months in solitary confinement. He founded a national mineworkers’ union and became an acolyte of Nelson Mandela in the liberation struggle.

He flattered Trump by calling South Africa’s economy “tiny” compared with the US’s – but who is the bigger man?

It must have been hard for Ramaphosa to take when Trump, droning on about the persecution of white farmers, asserted: “Now I will say, apartheid: terrible. That was the biggest threat. That was reported all the time. This is sort of the opposite of apartheid.”

But Ramaphosa had prepared a soft ambush of his own. Starmer might have brought an invitation to meet the king, but Ramaphosa knew that Trump loves nothing more than golf, so he brought the gift of a big book about South African golf courses. More importantly, he had a white cavalry including agriculture minister John Steenhuisen and golfers Ernie Els and Retief Goosen.

There was also South African’s richest person, luxury goods magnate Johann Rupert, both whitesplaining and wealthsplaining – the two languages that Trump understands.

“We have many deaths, but it’s across the board – not just white farmers,” Rupert said, saying the country needs technological help from Musk’s Starlink, and even recalling how much his wife loved JD Vance’s book Hillbilly Elegy.

Trump had failed to hector Ramaphosa into submission and, like a bully lashing out, took out his frustration on NBC reporter Peter Alexander, whom he branded a “jerk” for asking about his plan to accept a $400m plane from Qatar.

“Why did a country give an airplane to the United States air force?” Trump asked rhetorically. “So they could help us out, because we need an Air Force One. That’s what that idiot talks about, after viewing a thing where thousands of people are dead.”

Ramaphosa interjected: “I’m sorry I don’t have a plane to give you.”

Trump, with a model plane on the table before him, responded: “I wish you did. I would take it. If your country offered the United States air force a plane, I would take it.”

“OK,” Ramaphosa replied, trying to keep a straight face.

Like Macron, Starmer and Carney before him, he had survived Washington’s trial by television."

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...-ramaphosa
Reply
Reply
#3
Syne Offline
They conveniently avoid the facts that a Boer is "a South African of Dutch, German, or Huguenot descent." IOW, a white South African.
So singing songs about shooting Boers is literally racist.
Reply
#4
Magical Realist Offline
And the Boers or Afrikaans weren't racist? It was who they were at war with..like...well like native Americans and the white settlers.

"Despite the words, the song should not be taken as a literal call to violence, according to Mr. Malema and veterans and historians of the anti-apartheid struggle. It has been around for decades, one of many battle cries of the anti-apartheid movement that remain a defining feature of the country’s political culture.

The chant was born at a time when Black South Africans were fighting a violent, racist regime, and was made popular in the early 1990s by Peter Mokaba."
Reply
#5
Syne Offline
What, tit for tat racism? Still racism.

And the song wasn't a literal call to violence, even though it was a "battle cry" while "fighting a violent, racist regime?"
Even if that were true, how is it appropriate now, to use against an oppressed minority?
Reply
#6
stryder Offline
Trumps attempt didn't go the way he wanted because he thinks he is moves ahead.

Drawing attention to South Africa would likely cause wounds to fester, not just for the recent events but history. It was likely done to stir up a media frenzy, however the media didn't bite at the rate he wanted (hung up on Air Farce One)

I'm sure Trump do more shit stirring on his Truth* Social or X (*its funny how regimes built on propaganda have to use terms like Truth or Pravda, It's right up there with naming devices "Smart" which incidentally they are not.)

Trump needs to understand, he had his 100 days of little opposition, the gloves are off now, The opposition and the press don't have to treat him as a darling.
Reply
#7
Syne Offline
"Little opposition?" You obviously haven't been paying attention.
Truth Social was made after Trump left office. It has no ties to government.

Recent history in South Africa is the government taking farms, strictly from white farmers, without any compensation. If black or brown farmers were being targeted like that, you'd hear about it constantly in the news. Instead, we only hear about it because Trump says something the leftist media wants to criticize him about.
Reply
#8
confused2 Offline
Quote:The most striking scene in the video was an aerial shot of thousands of white crosses by the side of the road - a "burial site" President Trump repeatedly said, of more than a thousand Afrikaners murdered in recent years.
...
One of the Raffertys' neighbours, businessman Rob Hoatson, told the BBC how he organised the crosses to capture public attention, such was the shock over the couple's deaths.

"It's not a burial site," he explained, saying Trump was prone to "exaggeration", adding though that he did not mind the image of the crosses being used. "It was a memorial. It was not a permanent memorial that was erected. It was a temporary memorial."
BBC news .. in full: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce81334je72o

There's Trump Truth and there's actual facts - for Trump followers they are automatically the same thing - for anyone else .. you either understand or you don't.
Reply
#9
Syne Offline
Yes, keep hammering on Trump's exaggeration, so you can avoid the current racist policies of South Africa's government.
Reply
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article 2 National Guard members shot in an ambush attack just blocks from the White House C C 8 264 Nov 29, 2025 06:27 PM
Last Post: C C
  Lichtman fails to predict correct outcome of election: 8 out of 10 now C C 2 755 Nov 15, 2024 09:41 PM
Last Post: C C
  Genocide double standard Syne 14 2,130 May 4, 2024 09:57 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Article (UK) Jewish groups denounce David Miller ruling + PA targets CDW's "genocide profits" C C 1 523 Feb 7, 2024 12:20 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Article UK’s Labour Party to recognize Uyghur genocide if it wins elections C C 3 659 Apr 1, 2023 01:57 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Too little, too late: study examines why the Endangered Species Act fails C C 0 397 Oct 13, 2022 06:21 PM
Last Post: C C
  UK foreign policy + Brexit fails again: What next? + Polyamory C C 0 521 Mar 29, 2019 07:00 PM
Last Post: C C
  why democracy fails Carol 10 3,021 Apr 19, 2018 09:07 PM
Last Post: Syne



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)