Feb 20, 2025 03:05 AM
Again, apophenia/pareidolia. Learn something for once.
|
Feb 20, 2025 03:36 AM
Wonder what they call the tendency to see swarms of gnats where there are none? Dumbassness?
Feb 20, 2025 04:34 AM
They only have terms for actual perceptual errors. You seeming to think low quality video with no contrast could easily pick them up would also count as a cognitive error.
You obviously opted out of learning anything.
Feb 20, 2025 04:59 AM
Quote:You seeming to think low quality video with no contrast could easily pick them up would also count as a cognitive error. LOL So there's a cloud of gnats there because the camera can't pick them up? That's the very definition of delusion.
Feb 20, 2025 05:37 AM
You're obviously intellectually dishonest with no argument, since you have to keep cherry-picking what I said.
But maybe you're memory is actually so bad you really can't remember that I just said you CAN see them against the contrast of the ground. Lay off the drugs, moron.
Feb 20, 2025 06:13 AM
(This post was last modified: Feb 20, 2025 06:20 AM by Magical Realist.)
You just said they couldn't be seen in low contrast with the camera. Which means you think they are there because they are unseen. Own your stupidity..
Feb 21, 2025 12:36 AM
(This post was last modified: Feb 21, 2025 12:36 AM by Syne.)
Again, your illiteracy has stump you, moron. If something cannot be done "easily" it doesn't mean it's impossible. In this case, the camera cannot easily pick them up against the low contrast sky, but did against the higher contrast ground.
Learn to read, moron.
Feb 21, 2025 12:45 AM
Quote:In this case, the camera cannot easily pick them up against the low contrast sky, but did against the higher contrast ground. Again, if the camera isn't picking up anything in the low contrast sky, which it isn't, it doesn't mean a cloud of gnats is there. And you repeating it doesn't make it true..
Feb 21, 2025 04:49 AM
No, it's simple reasoning skills, which you completely lack.
In lieu of reasoning you substitute "it's a little ghost girl." If that were true, that doesn't explain why the dog ignores the "ghost" after supposedly playing with it, which invalidates it as an explanation for the dog's behavior. What explains both, are swarms of gnats. You know, parsimony. Wait... you obviously don't know... you're far too illiterate.
Feb 21, 2025 06:16 AM
(This post was last modified: Feb 21, 2025 06:45 AM by Magical Realist.)
Quote:If that were true, that doesn't explain why the dog ignores the "ghost" after supposedly playing with it, which invalidates it as an explanation for the dog's behavior. Saying it is a cloud of gnats because the camera can't pick it doesn't explain why the dog ignores it either. Assuming dogs don't get tired or easily distracted by their master who's standing there watching him. And the fast moving white translucent shape moves across the yard looks like an apparition not a cloud of gnats. Factor in the little girl's giggle that was recorded and you have compelling evidence of a ghost. Evidence over parsimony every time.. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads… | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| Article Non-ordinary reality: mystical integration & everyday life (psychedelic journeys) | C C | 0 | 608 |
Mar 21, 2025 06:19 PM Last Post: C C |
|