Everyday anomalies

#1
Magical Realist Offline
I devote this thread to anomalous events that have been solidly documented to have happened that are very rare, very strange, very coincidental, or even without any current scientific explanation. It will be a running account of life in this extremely strange and extraordinary universe of ours...

Here's the first:

"On May 17, 2023, at approximately 4:05 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time, a rock smashed through the rear window of a parked vehicle in Carbon County, Pa., landing in a 1.5-quart (1.41-liter) container of Breyers Natural Vanilla Ice Cream. As it smashed through the window, it passed through a decal that had been placed on the outside of the rear window in memory of a grandson who had been killed by a drunk driver, the safety glass of the window itself, and a tinted film on the inside of the window.

The location was a Walmart lot in Lehighton, PA. The man and his wife put the groceries in the car, got in, and the window smashed. I can only imagine the terror of this event to the occupants. Thankfully, neither was hurt. Police investigated it as a case of vandalism, temporarily keeping the 1.5 x 2.5 inch rock. No other fragments were found.

Examining security camera footage, police saw the rock hit at high speed, but were unable to see any hint that it was thrown by a person. The footage did show a smoky trail in the sky and there had been a meteor shower occurring. The police suspected it might be a meteorite, even though it is extraordinarily rare to be hit by one. With obvious sources (like fly rock or trucks) seemingly eliminated, the vehicle owner kept the rock and “contacted several prominent institutions” to request identification. All turned down the option to test the rock except for the Pennsylvania State Museum (under the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission), who, in turn, contacted the authors of the PA Geology paper, retired members of the PA Bureau of Geological Survey. It’s all about who you know!

The three authors of the paper had some experience in testing suspected meteorites, which they called “meteorwrongs” because none were the real deal. The rest of the paper is a fairly easy-to-follow chronicle of all the careful cutting, polishing and testing that they did with the help of other experts. This included dealing with the contamination of the impact (through the car window decal and the ice cream), and possible contamination from the tools and equipment for testing, while trying to use as little of the sample as possible. The mineralogy was examined – the outer crust and internal composition tested separately.

The “stony” rock was magnetic but did not look like the shiny black metallic meteorites commonly known. Instead, it was consistent with a mineral assemblage of a metamorphosed ultramafic rock – a type of rock that is usually formed in the earth’s mantle – but in this case was likely created as the residue left behind after a host rock partially melts, leaving a nickel-iron metal rock rich in silica via a green mineral named olivine. The samples were sent to a lab in Canada for further testing, confirming the rock was an achondrite (classification of meteorite) that had a multi-stage history.

This was only a preliminary investigation. It is not disclosed what the owner chose to do with the rest of the sample. The total mass was 117.6 g with 23.5 g donated to the State Museum of Pennsylvania for nondestructive study and analysis, and for preservation. Additional study of the sample could lead to a greater understanding of the origin of our solar system."----
https://altnews.org/2025/01/13/a-meteor-...ice-cream/
Reply
#2
Zinjanthropos Offline
While I don’t find rocks falling from the sky an anomaly the fact that one actually punched through a decal on a window might be considered anomalous, something that might not have been predicted. Still if your car is parked in a meteor shower zone then there was always a possibility.

Is there such a thing as a natural anomaly? I mean if it can happen it just might or just because it did happen doesn’t make it an anomaly.

From wiki: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anomalistics

Excerpt:
Quote: According to Truzzi, before an explanation can be considered valid within anomalistics, it must fulfill four criteria. It must be based on conventional knowledge and reasoning; it must be kept simple and be unburdened by speculation or overcomplexity; the burden of proof must be placed on the claimant and not the researcher; and the more extraordinary the claim, the higher the level of proof required.

Bauer states that nothing can be deemed as proof within anomalistics unless it can gain "acceptance by the established disciplines".
Reply
#3
Magical Realist Offline
anomaly (plural anomalies)

1)A deviation from a rule or from what is regarded as normal; an outlier.
Synonyms: abnormality, deviance, deviation, exception, inconsistency, irregularity, phenomenon

2)Something or someone that is strange or unusual.
He is an anomaly among his friends in that he's the only one who's unmarried.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/anomaly

Examples of natural anomalies:

https://brightside.me/articles/8-anomali...er-551910/
Reply
#4
Zinjanthropos Offline
(Jan 14, 2025 10:36 PM)Magical Realist Wrote: anomaly (plural anomalies)

1)A deviation from a rule or from what is regarded as normal; an outlier.
Synonyms: abnormality, deviance, deviation, exception, inconsistency, irregularity, phenomenon

2)Something or someone that is strange or unusual.
He is an anomaly among his friends in that he's the only one who's unmarried.

Looks like you just ruled out UAP/UfOs as anomalies since they seem pretty common. You’d have to know exactly what they are if you want to even consider them.
Reply
#5
Magical Realist Offline
Quote:Looks like you just ruled out UAP/UfOs as anomalies since they seem pretty common.

UAPs aren't common at all, especially compared to all the common things we see flying in sky. And they have no current scientific explanation, so that makes them doubly anomalistic. Why are you trying to debunk and define out of existence anomalies? Even scientists acknowledge their reality.
Reply
#6
Zinjanthropos Offline
(Jan 15, 2025 12:43 AM)Magical Realist Wrote:
Quote:Looks like you just ruled out UAP/UfOs as anomalies since they seem pretty common.

UAPs aren't common at all, especially compared to all the common things we see flying in sky. And they have no current scientific explanation, so that makes them doubly anomalistic. Why are you trying to debunk and define out of existence anomalies? Even scientists acknowledge their reality.

Not at all. Unidentified sightings in the sky are not strange, peculiar, abnormal, a deviation from what’s normal, irregular, etc. How can they be anomalous?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_..._sightings

Excerpt:
Quote: UFOs have been referred to using a range of terms including the more specific "flying saucer" and the more general "unidentified anomalous phenomena" (UAP). The term "UAP" is sometimes used to avoid cultural associations with UFO conspiracy theories.[5][6][7]

Sounds like a woke term. Nothing to do with actual anomalies, just make sure feelings aren’t hurt?
Reply
#7
Magical Realist Offline
Quote:Nothing to do with actual anomalies,

LOL It's right there in your own quote:

"UFOs have been referred to using a range of terms including the more specific "flying saucer" and the more general "unidentified anomalous phenomena" (UAP)."

Google AI result:

--UAPs were previously called "unidentified aerial phenomena" (UAPs).
--The Pentagon updated the term in December 2022 to include underwater and trans-medium objects.
--NASA and other agencies followed suit.
--The term UAP is used to describe objects that can't be identified as aircraft or known natural phenomena.
Reply
#8
Zinjanthropos Offline
(Jan 15, 2025 03:02 AM)Magical Realist Wrote:
Quote:Nothing to do with actual anomalies,

LOL It's right there in your own quote:

"UFOs have been referred to using a range of terms including the more specific "flying saucer" and the more general "unidentified anomalous phenomena" (UAP)."

Syne’s right …you either don’t read the whole thing or cherry pick. We’re done here.
Reply
#9
Magical Realist Offline
(Jan 15, 2025 04:03 AM)Zinjanthropos Wrote:
(Jan 15, 2025 03:02 AM)Magical Realist Wrote:
Quote:Nothing to do with actual anomalies,

LOL It's right there in your own quote:

"UFOs have been referred to using a range of terms including the more specific "flying saucer" and the more general "unidentified anomalous phenomena" (UAP)."

Syne’s right …you either don’t read the whole thing or cherry pick. We’re done here.

Yeah..it helps to actually know the meaning of acronyms like UAP before just ignorantly denying their existence..So are you and Syne a couple now?

Guillermo Del Toro's uap experience as told to James Cameron:

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1346768623161443
Reply
#10
Syne Offline
Wow, is that how things work in your world? Someone simply agrees with you and you're a couple?
Man, gays are such sluts.

Just because they changed the acronym doesn't change the fact that people see lights, objects, etc. they cannot identify all the time. Hence it cannot be anomalous, by definition.

Sure, you can cling to it to avoid the stigma of being a UFO nutter, but we all know the truth. Quit hiding. Come out of the closet.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article Non-ordinary reality: mystical integration & everyday life (psychedelic journeys) C C 0 506 Mar 21, 2025 06:19 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)