Article  Scientific American proposes policing the language of astronomy

#1
C C Offline
Scientific American proposes policing the language of astronomy to make it “beautiful and elegant”, as well as “inclusive” and non-triggering
https://whyevolutionistrue.com/2024/01/0...riggering/

INTRO (Jerry Coyne): Oops! Scientific American did it again, this time with an op-ed that could have been ripped from the pages of The Onion.  As is so common these days, the piece proposes that we change the language of science (astronomy in this case), since some of its terms are bad in four ways:
  •   a.  They are violent, sexist, and triggering
  •   b. They are not “beautiful and elegant” like astronomy is, but grating; and they are “not kind”
  •   c.  They are non-inclusive, presumably helping keep minorities out of astronomy.
  •   d. They are untruthful and distort astronomy
In my view, none of these claims holds up, for the article is all Pecksniffian assertion with not a shred of evidence. Author Juan Madrid assumes the role of a bomb-sniffing dog, snuffling the field of astronomy for linguistic mines.

Click the headline below to read and weep, or find the piece archived here.  The author is identified this way (my link)... (MORE - details)
Reply
#2
Secular Sanity Offline
"Astronomy is beautiful and elegant. The language we use to describe its processes is anything but"

That's just crazy. 

“Man imagines the world itself to be overflowing with beauty - he forgets that he is the cause of it all.”—Nietzsche

There are areas with high levels of radiation, intense gravitational forces, extreme temperatures, and other inhospitable conditions, but it’s also indifferent. Hugging would be out the question.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Scientific American endorses Kamala Harris. Here's why that's a good thing C C 7 1,370 Nov 19, 2024 07:12 PM
Last Post: C C
  The unscientific "Scientific American" + "Washington Post" caters to past lives C C 0 298 May 7, 2024 05:50 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article "Scientific American" is back to distorting the facts to buttress its ideology C C 1 444 Oct 26, 2023 11:48 PM
Last Post: confused2
  Article Once again, Scientific American ideology distorts science: "Animal sex is not binary" C C 0 344 May 19, 2023 02:05 PM
Last Post: C C
  Scientific American finds SETI racist & colonialist + Fat acceptance movement (Maher) C C 2 497 Aug 14, 2022 11:01 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Aaronson: demise of Scientific American + Richard Dawkins on race & sex controversy C C 0 320 Jan 6, 2022 06:13 PM
Last Post: C C
  'Woke' Scientific American goes anti-GMO + SciAm's hit job on E.O. Wilson C C 1 452 Jan 1, 2022 02:18 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Michael Shermer documents the decline and fall of Scientific American C C 0 320 Nov 19, 2021 07:07 PM
Last Post: C C
  Scientific American (and math) go full woke C C 2 442 Aug 31, 2021 04:19 AM
Last Post: Yazata
  Scientific American says 5G is dangerous, vegetables are junk food C C 0 446 Oct 23, 2019 03:03 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)