Article  World’s largest study shows the more you walk, the lower your risk of death

#1
C C Offline
World’s largest study shows the more you walk, the lower your risk of death, even if you walk fewer than 5,000 steps
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwad229

RELEASE: The number of steps you should walk every day to start seeing benefits to your health is lower than previously thought, according to the largest analysis to investigate this.

The study, published in the European Journal of Preventive Cardiology today (Wednesday), found that walking at least 3967 steps a day started to reduce the risk of dying from any cause, and 2337 steps a day reduced the risk of dying from diseases of the heart and blood vessels (cardiovascular disease).

However, the new analysis of 226,889 people from 17 different studies around the world has shown that the more you walk, the greater the health benefits. The risk of dying from any cause or from cardiovascular disease decreases significantly with every 500 to 1000 extra steps you walk. An increase of 1000 steps a day was associated with a 15% reduction in the risk of dying from any cause, and an increase of 500 steps a day was associated with a 7% reduction in dying from cardiovascular disease.

The researchers, led by Maciej Banach, Professor of Cardiology at the Medical University of Lodz, Poland, and Adjunct Professor at the Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, found that even if people walked as many as 20,000 steps a day, the health benefits continued to increase. They have not found an upper limit yet.

“Our study confirms that the more you walk, the better,” says Prof. Banach. “We found that this applied to both men and women, irrespective of age, and irrespective of whether you live in a temperate, sub-tropical or sub-polar region of the world, or a region with a mixture of climates. In addition, our analysis indicates that as little as 4,000 steps a day are needed to significantly reduce deaths from any cause, and even fewer to reduce deaths from cardiovascular disease.”

There is strong evidence that a sedentary lifestyle may contribute to an increase in cardiovascular disease and a shorter life. Studies have shown that insufficient physical activity affects more than a quarter of the world’s population. More women than men (32% versus 23%), and people in higher income countries compared to low-income countries (37% versus 16%) do not undertake a sufficient amount of physical activity.

According to World Health Organization data, insufficient physical activity is the fourth most frequent cause of death in the world, with 3.2 million deaths a year related to physical inactivity. The COVID-19 pandemic also resulted in a reduction in physical activity, and activity levels have not recovered two years on from it.

Dr Ibadete Bytyçi from the University Clinical Centre of Kosovo, Pristina, Kosovo, senior author of the paper, says: “Until now, it’s not been clear what is the optimal number of steps, both in terms of the cut-off points over which we can start to see health benefits, and the upper limit, if any, and the role this plays in people’s health. However, I should emphasise that there were limited data available on step counts up to 20,000 a day, and so these results need to be confirmed in larger groups of people.”

This meta-analysis is the first not only to assess the effect of walking up to 20,000 steps a day, but also to look at whether there are any differences depending on age, sex or where in the world people live.

The studies analysed by the researchers followed up participants for a median (average) of seven years. The mean (average) age was 64, and 49% of participants were female.

In people aged 60 years or older, the size of the reduction in risk of death was smaller than that seen in people aged younger than 60 years. In the older adults, there was a 42% reduction in risk seen in those who walked between 6,000 and 10,000 steps a day, while there was a 49% reduction in risk in younger adults who walked between 7,000 and 13,000 steps a day.

Prof. Banach says: “In a world where we have more and more advanced drugs to target specific conditions such as cardiovascular disease, I believe we should always emphasise that lifestyle changes, including diet and exercise, which was a main hero of our analysis, might be at least as, or even more effective in reducing cardiovascular risk and prolonging lives. We still need good studies to investigate whether these benefits may exist for intensive types of exertion, such as marathon running and iron man challenges, and in different populations of different ages, and with different associated health problems. However, it seems that, as with pharmacological treatments, we should always think about personalising lifestyle changes.”

Strengths of the meta-analysis include its size and that it was not restricted to looking at studies limited to a maximum of 16,000 steps a day. Limitations include that it was an observational study and so cannot prove that increased step counts cause the reduction in the risk of death, only that it is associated with it. The impact of step counts was not tested on people with different diseases; all the participants were generally healthy when they entered the studies analysed. The researchers were not able to account for differences in race and socioeconomic status, and the methods for counting steps were not identical in all the studies included in this meta-analysis.
Reply
#2
Magical Realist Offline
I wonder if they take into account the usual hazards of walking like getting hit by a car, falling down, getting mugged, getting attacked by a dog, hit by a falling tree limb, and ofcourse, being struck by lightning. Tongue
Reply
#3
C C Offline
(Aug 9, 2023 04:53 PM)Magical Realist Wrote: I wonder if they take into account the usual hazards of walking like getting hit by a car, falling down, getting mugged, getting attacked by a dog, hit by a falling tree limb, and ofcourse, being struck by lightning. Tongue

Yeah, it definitely has its hazards in the city, and even in the country if one walks roads instead of on one's own property (rabid animals, cougars, etc contingently applicable with the latter). There was an elderly man who got killed by a teenage driver while taking his regular excursion along the edge of a rural road.

If it's level land, anyway, then one might as well walk around in circles in a yard or even back and forth in a room (boredom of it drives one crazy, though).

I've taken to walking up and down a hill that we've got, instead of the flatter woods. Stairs might do as an indoor alternative (if they're high enough), or treadmills and stationary bikes. Not sure why they didn't mention the latter -- many people in poor countries probably couldn't afford them, but accordingly they're probably doing more walking anyway than the denizens of elite regions.

Push-ups are an alternative to walking, though it surely doesn't help the legs as much. One study in the past asserted that a "mere" fifty push-ups a day substantially reduced cardiovascular health problems later in life.

I do a "standing toe touching" exercise (purely guessing that's what they call it). 200 hundred or more a day, which really helped me avoid back problems (though that purely pertains to me -- it might cause back problems for someone else). The trick to not killing yourself with soreness in the beginning is to only touch your toes (from a standing, upright position) one or two times, the first day. And then gradually add one or two attempts each day afterward until you can handle 50, 100 times -- whatever, without suffering misery as a consequence.

Years ago I met an ex-military woman who said she did 100 push-ups a day non-stop (maybe she could do more, but that was her idea of sufficient). But she didn't have the burden of being married to a guy with a phobia about even mildly muscular-toned "wrong kind of" chest developments on the other side of humankind. After some weeks (a month?) of seeing how far I could get bit by bit, I went back to 27 to be on the safe side.
Reply
#4
Magical Realist Offline
I've gotta start taking my walks in the park again. While my heart was recently checked out and found ok, I am still 20 lbs overweight and prediabetic. Studies like this one are wakeup calls to improve my health in ways that will pay off in the long run. I'm 63 yrs old and plan to be around till my 80's. Might as well get used to being active again.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article What your neck size reveals about your health C C 0 243 Aug 29, 2025 02:19 PM
Last Post: C C
  Research How high is your dementia risk? It might depend on where you live C C 0 360 Jun 9, 2025 11:27 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Here's what your hearing could say about your heart failure risk (fitness) C C 0 431 Apr 11, 2025 07:19 PM
Last Post: C C
  Research 1 in 5 youths are an at-risk mental health consumer of TikTok (girls more than boys) C C 0 493 Dec 21, 2024 10:03 PM
Last Post: C C
  Research New study shows how dementia affects the brain's ability to empathise C C 0 431 Dec 3, 2024 10:05 PM
Last Post: C C
  Research Kids with pets or kids on farms develop allergies at lower rates C C 0 394 Nov 29, 2024 05:50 AM
Last Post: C C
  Article Religiosity, spirituality, & meaning-making generally related to lower suicidality C C 1 518 Nov 19, 2024 04:31 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Research ASU study shows middle-aged Americans are lonelier than European peers C C 0 431 Mar 19, 2024 07:19 PM
Last Post: C C
  Research Major study identifies 15 factors linked to early dementia risk C C 0 372 Jan 10, 2024 07:08 PM
Last Post: C C
  Your “immune resilience” greatly impacts your health and lifespan C C 0 332 Nov 20, 2023 07:13 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)