The exercise "recovery" industry is largely bogus

C C Offline

INTRO: When health journalist Christie Aschwanden was traveling the world as a competitive ski racer in the 1990s and 2000s, recovery between training sessions basically meant doing nothing — taking a day to sleep in or lie around with a good book. About a decade ago, she noticed something had changed: recovery became a thing athletes actively performed — with foam rollers, cryotherapy, or cupping — as part of their training routines. These recovery tools were heavily marketed to athletes, including amateur ones, as a means to boost performance and bust muscle aches.

In a new book, Good to Go: What the Athlete in All of Us Can Learn from the Strange Science of Recovery, Aschwanden walks through all the biggest recovery fads of the past decade — and exposes the shoddy science backing most of them.

It’s an intelligent and entertaining tour of fitness research for anyone who exercises, with clear advice on what actually works to aid recovery. I won’t give away all the juicy details in the book, but I did ask Aschwanden to walk me through three of the most dubious recovery methods she uncovered. Here’s what she told me.

(COVERED: Athletes should be more concerned about overhydration than dehydration ... Cold therapy after exercising can hamper recovery ... There’s no good evidence that cupping therapy works ... So what actually works to speed recovery?)


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Self esteem is overrated: Decades of "me" generations bogus pop psychology C C 1 74 Jan 26, 2021 09:26 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Peer reviewers getting sophomoric, unreliable & subjective + Is social priming bogus? C C 1 174 Dec 14, 2019 07:04 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Generational thinking: A bogus, pseudoscientific enterprise? C C 0 578 May 31, 2015 07:03 PM
Last Post: C C

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)