Research  Fossil fuel industry influences medical research, raising ethical concerns

#1
C C Offline
https://www.news-medical.net/news/202411...cerns.aspx

INTRO: An investigation published by The BMJ today reveals the extent of fossil fuel industry involvement in medical research, leading to fresh calls for academics and publishing companies to cut ties with companies.

An analysis by journalists Hristio Boytchev, Natalie Widmann and Simon Wörpel found that over the past six years, more than 180 medical articles have acknowledged fossil fuel industry funding, and an additional 1000 articles feature authors who worked for a fossil fuel company or related organization.

While many studies don't have an obvious link with fossil fuel industry interests, experts told The BMJ that publishing research benefits the companies by enhancing their reputation and buying influence with researchers and health practitioners.

The BMJ analysis found that Saudi Aramco, Saudi Arabia's national oil company, was involved in around 600 articles, mostly through Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare (JHAH), a joint project between the oil giant and Johns Hopkins Medicine. Many of these papers concerned infectious diseases such as covid-19 and Mpox.

ExxonMobil was linked to the second largest group of articles. The ExxonMobil Foundation has funded the WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network, which supports malaria research. Until recently, the company spent almost three decades drilling for oil in Equatorial Guinea, a country with a high risk of malaria.

Johns Hopkins University, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, and ExxonMobil did not respond to The BMJ's requests to comment. Saudi Aramco declined to comment.

More than 1,000 articles were co-authored by employees of the companies... (MORE - details)
Reply
#2
Syne Offline
Oh no. The funding for medical research didn't have any effect other than enhancing the reputations of those evil oil producers?
Typical eco-nut BS. They'd rather cut off their nose despite their face.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Trump's latest crackpot medical advice Magical Realist 9 865 Sep 24, 2025 07:58 AM
Last Post: stryder
  Article Will medical publishers fight Trump’s war on 'woke'? + Forensic metascience C C 0 971 Feb 23, 2025 08:12 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Epidemic of fake papers in medical research + Invasion of the journal snatchers C C 0 416 Feb 4, 2025 09:19 PM
Last Post: C C
  Research Tobacco funded research still appearing in top medical journals C C 0 374 May 31, 2024 02:10 AM
Last Post: C C
  Research Scientists exaggerate how ethical they are in doing science C C 0 344 Apr 25, 2024 07:40 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Surge in number of ‘extremely productive’ authors concerns scientists C C 0 351 Dec 12, 2023 07:00 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article How wealthy UFO fans helped fuel fringe beliefs C C 0 323 Sep 18, 2023 03:17 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Shaky evidence for medical cannabis + The fraud behind the “discovery” of element 118 C C 0 447 Jun 13, 2023 02:24 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article EPA uses shoddy science + EBM versus SBM in medical school C C 0 376 May 23, 2023 02:19 PM
Last Post: C C
  Teaching UBC medical scholars that biological sex is a ‘colonial imposition’ + hijack C C 0 348 Feb 26, 2023 05:42 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)