How fear of electromagnetic radiation spawned a snake-oil industry

#1
C C Offline
And you thought the character of Chuck McGill in Better Call Saul -- with respect to his "illness" -- couldn't possibly correspond to a real, educated practictioner of any respected profession.
- - - - - - -

https://www.theverge.com/23071138/ehs-se...protection

EXCERPTS: . . . It’s advertised as a way to block electromagnetic fields, though with no clear or proven explanation of how or why. It costs over $200, but you can buy a bigger one for over $350.

But David Fancy, who believes he’s sensitive to electromagnetic fields, says it’s the only thing — other than moving into a tent on a friend’s woodlot in Ontario, Canada — that helped the blinding headaches, full-body nerve pain, and brain fog he says he’d been experiencing since 2001.

And he’s tried a lot of different products: he says he spent about $2,500 on cell phone stickers, handheld so-called energy shields, and other devices advertised as ways to make him feel better. “My experience has been that 90 percent of these devices don’t work,” he says.

But the chance they might have was enough for him to spend the money. Fancy, a professor at Brock University’s dramatic arts department in Ontario, has very real symptoms that he attributes to a controversial condition called electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS).

EHS ascribes symptoms ranging from dizziness to headaches or pain to the waves coming off of devices like cell phones or microwaves. In the US, it’s considered a fringe health theory, and the reasons for its symptoms are hotly debated among doctors and scientists. Numerous peer-reviewed studies found no scientific link between exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and illness, though many studies say further research needs to be done to understand people’s symptoms.

Because of his condition, Fancy is an easy target for companies selling products that claim to protect against low-frequency radiation. Others who believe they have EHS are targeted as well.

And, being largely isolated by and skeptical of the mainstream medical community, they’re particularly susceptible to the marketing, says Fancy. “They are desperate, and they are very prone to spending the remaining money that they have on some kind of shortcut device that’s allegedly going to help them.”

This has only escalated over the past few years, experts say. Both the pandemic and the growing prominence of health misinformation and conspiracies online have created the perfect environment for snake-oil salesmen to thrive, tapping into distrust in and legitimate concerns about the healthcare industry and offering expensive, useless devices as a solution.

[...] “Snake oil” products claiming to protect humans from radio waves became common as fears of radiofrequency radiation grew throughout the 20th century. The rise of radios, microwaves, and cell phones each triggered a new wave of fears about radiofrequency radiation.

People often confuse non-ionizing radiation — the low-frequency radiation that comes from our cell phones or home appliances that cannot damage DNA or cells directly — with ionizing radiation like X-rays that can be potentially harmful to humans, he says.

As early as the 1970s and ‘80s, experimental studies on radiation were a big business, says Charles Stevens, a neuroscientist who chaired a National Academy of Sciences committee on radiation risk. There was plenty of government and private funding available for research on electromagnetic radiation, and the studies conducted with that funding were not always accurate, he says. Others were then able to use those flawed studies to back products that claimed to offer protection... (MORE - missing details)
Reply
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article When it comes to climate and energy, let’s retire the politics of fear C C 0 2 Feb 8, 2026 03:56 AM
Last Post: C C
  News article or big oil ad? As advertisements mislead readers on climate change C C 0 670 Mar 4, 2025 05:44 PM
Last Post: C C
  Research Fossil fuel industry influences medical research, raising ethical concerns C C 1 544 Nov 28, 2024 12:52 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Article Top 10 anti-biotech propagandizers: The science deniers & snake oil peddlers C C 0 323 Apr 2, 2023 11:55 PM
Last Post: C C
  Don’t fall for the snake oil claims of ‘structured water’. C C 3 790 Aug 6, 2022 10:31 PM
Last Post: RainbowUnicorn
  How industry weaponizes science & sows doubt to serve their agenda C C 0 368 Nov 11, 2021 12:57 AM
Last Post: C C
  Big oil’s ‘wokewashing’ is the new climate science denialism C C 1 479 Sep 10, 2021 06:00 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Peer review is wheel of misfortune + How sci gave its soul to the publishing industry C C 0 592 Feb 11, 2020 06:05 AM
Last Post: C C
  The exercise "recovery" industry is largely bogus C C 0 685 Feb 23, 2019 01:57 AM
Last Post: C C
  Is fear of how antivaxers react to findings causing scientists to self-censor? C C 1 657 Aug 8, 2018 03:10 PM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)