New book argues life is inevitable via laws of nature (philosophy of science)

#1
https://newrepublic.com/article/151988/life-emerge

EXCERPT: . . . But there is a third possibility. In his new book Universe in Creation: A New Understanding of the Big Bang and the Emergence of Life, Roy Gould, an education researcher at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, argues that life is neither a miracle nor an aberration, but an inevitability whose emergence is dictated by the laws of nature. He frames his book around a question posed by the physicist John Archibald Wheeler in 1983. “Is the machinery of the universe so set up, and from the very beginning,” Wheeler asked, “that it is guaranteed to produce intelligent life at some long-distant point in its history-to-be?”

Gould answers Wheeler’s hypothetical in the affirmative. To do so, he walks us through the history of the universe, making the case that at each step, the “universe’s major construction projects … laid the groundwork for life.” The result is a fascinating synthesis. [...] Gould artfully describes various other highlights in universal history [...]

Sometimes, such arguments carry a whiff of tautology: by definition life could not have emerged in the universe if the universe did not provide the preconditions for it do so. But in the final third of the book, Gould returns to answer Wheeler’s question more directly and persuasively, offering “the chief lines of evidence that life really is written into the universe’s building plan.” He notes, for instance that life appeared very soon after the planet’s birth: there are fossils that are almost 4 billion years old, while the earth has only been around for 4.5 billion years. This rapidity suggests a certain inclination towards life, as does the fact that you can find creatures everywhere on the planet, even in its most inhospitable corners, from the bottom of the oceans to, say, a boiling hot geothermal spring.

[...] When Gould turns to the origin of life itself, his book leaves somethings to be desired. He largely neglects to discuss competing theories of the origin of life. [...] Whichever specific origin of life theory we turn to, the thesis that life is somehow programmed into the universe feels uncomfortable but also attractive. Uncomfortable, because it seems to carry a whiff of creationism: Is this just wishful thinking after all, intelligent design gussied up for the scientifically-minded? It is attractive, however, for the same reason. It means that life is the inevitable, invariant consequence of the laws of physics at work, giving life about as much meaning in the universe as an atheist could in good conscience ask for....

MORE: https://newrepublic.com/article/151988/life-emerge
Reply
#2
This is just the strong anthropic principle. Nothing new here.
Reply
#3
When a cell replicates, is it making new life(form), technically speaking? A celestial body producing a life form, is it doing the same?
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Bring back science & philosophy as natural philosophy C C 0 50 May 15, 2019 02:21 AM
Last Post: C C
  Time for a robust defence of truth in science? (philosophy of science) C C 0 75 Mar 18, 2019 08:15 AM
Last Post: C C
  Blind spot of science is the neglect of lived experience (philosophy of science) C C 4 163 Jan 14, 2019 04:11 PM
Last Post: Secular Sanity
  (Philosophy of science videos) Laws of nature + After the end of evidence C C 8 178 Jan 8, 2019 08:55 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Einstein's God (philosophy of science) C C 0 152 Dec 4, 2018 07:58 PM
Last Post: C C
  The return of Aristotelian views in philosophy & philosophy of science: Goodbye Hume? C C 1 188 Aug 17, 2018 02:01 PM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos
  Myths of Copenhagen (philosophy of science) C C 3 468 Jun 11, 2018 10:25 PM
Last Post: Ostronomos
  A fetish for inflexible guidelines holds back science (philosophy of science) C C 1 185 Apr 6, 2018 05:38 AM
Last Post: Syne
  The nature of philosophy: Scruton vs Williamson edition C C 5 457 Nov 28, 2017 12:17 AM
Last Post: Secular Sanity
  What constitutes an individual organism in biology? (philosophy of science) C C 0 140 Oct 26, 2017 01:21 AM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)