Article  "Science does not describe reality" (philosophy of science)

#1
C C Offline
https://iai.tv/articles/science-does-not..._auid=2020

INTRO: We think of scientists creating models to explain reality. The effectiveness of these models, be it Einstein’s Theory of Relativity or Darwin’s Theory of Evolution makes us believe in them. Many scientists and philosophers argue taking them as explanations means these models are true. But this idea of explanation is as superfluous to theories of science as an orgasm is to procreation, argues Bas van Fraassen..... (MORE - details)

RELATED: Scientific Realism and Antirealism (IEP) ..... Scientific Realism (SEP) ...... Constructive Empiricism (Bas van Fraassen, SEP)
Reply
#2
Zinjanthropos Offline
(Jan 30, 2024 06:22 PM)C C Wrote: https://iai.tv/articles/science-does-not..._auid=2020

INTRO: We think of scientists creating models to explain reality. The effectiveness of these models, be it Einstein’s Theory of Relativity or Darwin’s Theory of Evolution makes us believe in them. Many scientists and philosophers argue taking them as explanations means these models are true. But this idea of explanation is as superfluous to theories of science as an orgasm is to procreation, argues Bas van Fraassen..... (MORE - details)

RELATED: Scientific Realism and Antirealism (IEP) ..... Scientific Realism (SEP) ...... Constructive Empiricism (Bas van Fraassen, SEP)

Five years ago you posted a ‘simple quantum games’ thread. In a response I used the I Dream of Jeannie analogy, if her world was the real world then whatever she winks into existence would have a scientific explanation. Even if it wasn’t the real world, a simulation, it stills has an explanation.

A simulator, whatever it is, should also have an explanation. I don’t know how it can be any other way. If God himself did a Jeannie then it has a scientific explanation. I wish religions would devote more time to find out how God does it at least. Then there’s God himself.

I think you said something about the Russian dolls back then. These topics seem to head in that direction.

Has anybody thought this: somewhere along the line someone, maybe a civilization aeons old, messed with time and we’re just one of countless butterfly effects.
Reply
#3
confused2 Offline
Rant ..
Reality is ineffable. It is what it is. The map is not the territory - is that a surprise? Mathematical models can be close, sometimes very close and sometimes not so much. Philosophy isn't just the wrong language for describing reality - it only exists and has any meaning in a 'philosophy universe' which, almost by definition, doesn't include reality.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article Reality is not a controlled hallucination C C 5 302 Mar 15, 2026 04:23 PM
Last Post: Ostronomos
  Article Anyons: the two dimensional particles that reframe reality (philosophy of physics) C C 1 163 Feb 7, 2026 09:39 PM
Last Post: Ostronomos
  Article Does our physical reality exist in an objective manner? C C 3 281 Dec 26, 2025 10:28 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Article No - Schrödinger’s cat is not alive & dead at the same time (philosophy of physics) C C 1 650 Apr 29, 2025 03:55 PM
Last Post: Ostronomos
  Article Einstein vs Bohr: Quantum reality is still up for grabs (philosophy of science) C C 3 981 Apr 9, 2025 04:42 PM
Last Post: Ostronomos
  Article We need new physics, not new particles (philosophy of physics) C C 1 672 Oct 3, 2023 07:13 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Article Faith-based beliefs are inescapable in science (philosophy of science) C C 3 966 Jul 1, 2023 12:44 AM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Article Finding ETs offers benefits, not existential risk (philosophy of extraterrestrials) C C 1 566 Apr 14, 2023 03:45 AM
Last Post: Kornee
  M=R does not imply that mind creates the object Ostronomos 0 433 Feb 20, 2023 04:23 PM
Last Post: Ostronomos
  Physics can't deal with reality's complexity (philosophy of science) C C 1 585 Oct 19, 2022 06:20 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)