Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

The Cash Landrum UFO

#11
Syne Offline
Where did it say "on the exposed parts of the body only"?
Reply
#12
Zinjanthropos Offline
Quote:There is thus never quite enough evidence to please the skeptic

Occupational hazard. Can't blame the skeptical for the hoaxers. Fakes and fraudsters are your biggest problem, not the skeptical.
Reply
#13
Magical Realist Online
Quote:Fakes and fraudsters are your biggest problem, not the skeptical.

Dismissing all ufos as fakes because some are fake is like dismissing all doctors as fake because some are fakes. It's the skeptic's easy out from having to think.

(Jul 17, 2018 02:47 AM)Syne Wrote: Where did it say "on the exposed parts of the body only"?

Where did it say they ate too many brazil nuts?
Reply
#14
Zinjanthropos Offline
Quote:Dismissing all ufos as fakes because some are fake is like dismissing all doctors as fake because some are fakes. It's the skeptic's easy out from having to think.


But skeptics know real doctors exist. Dismissing all doctors as fakes will never happen so I fail to see this reasoning. Hey man, I want ET as much as you do but hearsay, photos, artist impressions don't cut it for me. You, not me, need to find a way past the skeptical hurdle.
Reply
#15
Magical Realist Online
Quote:But skeptics know real doctors exist. Dismissing all doctors as fakes will never happen so I fail to see this reasoning.

It's the same leap. You dismiss all ufo photos as fake just as one might dismiss all doctors as fake. It's the same bullshit reasoning that conveniently excuses you from having to look into each case without bias..

Quote:Hey man, I want ET as much as you do but hearsay, photos, artist impressions don't cut it for me.

Confirming once again there's just never enough evidence to please the skeptic.
Reply
#16
Zinjanthropos Offline
Quote:It's the same leap. You dismiss all ufo photos as fake just as one might dismiss all doctors as fake. It's same bullshit reasoning that conveniently excuses from have to look into the cases..

Not even close. For you it's the same problem..... Get by the skeptic. When you figure that out then you should have some real proof. First thing you need to know though, is that not all skeptics think every photo is fake. It's a frustrating dilemma for you and I don't think the problem gets any less solvable by calling out skeptics.  Trying to say I sympathize but unfortunately it's you that needs to find a way past it.
Reply
#17
Magical Realist Online
Quote:Not even close. For you it's the same problem..... Get by the skeptic. When you figure that out then you should have some real proof. First thing you need to know though, is that not all skeptics think every photo is fake. It's a frustrating dilemma for you and I don't think the problem gets any less solvable by calling out skeptics. Trying to say I sympathize but unfortunately it's you that needs to find a way past it.

Not even concerned with convincing skeptics because I know they've already decided there's no ufos. So I provide evidence for the objective seekers of truth and the open minded. The ones really interested in finding out what these things are. That's what I was. And I studied the evidence for myself. Those are the ones I aim my data towards. The honestly curious with no debunking agenda..
Reply
#18
Syne Offline
(Jul 17, 2018 03:23 AM)Magical Realist Wrote:
(Jul 17, 2018 02:47 AM)Syne Wrote: Where did it say "on the exposed parts of the body only"?

Where did it say they ate too many brazil nuts?

Seleniferous soils and concentrations of copper can contaminate drinking water.
But with the story she told, sounds intentional, especially with your fabricated "exposed body parts" nonsense.

Why would a liar or mentally ill admit to intentional poisoning?
Reply
#19
Magical Realist Online
Quote:Why would a liar or mentally ill admit to intentional poisoning?

Where did it say she was a mentally ill woman who intentionally poisoned herself? You're just making up all sorts of shit aren't you?
Reply
#20
Syne Offline
(Jul 17, 2018 05:41 AM)Magical Realist Wrote:
Quote:Why would a liar or mentally ill admit to intentional poisoning?

Where did it say she was a mentally ill woman who intentionally poisoned herself? You're just making up all sorts of shit aren't you?

Like your hypocritical "on the exposed parts of the body only"? Rolleyes

Where did she say that again? O_o

If it was Munchhausen, she would never admit it. And if that got her ongoing attention, she'd have little reason to repeat...at least to that extreme.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Tumbleweed entity attacks journalist + Don't bury cash + Grim Reaper roams beaches C C 0 150 May 4, 2020 09:11 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)