Tales of telepathic dogmen

[Magical Realist]

No wonder you can't manage to comprehend any of the scientific research on the topic of eyewitnesses. You're reading comprehension just isn't up to the task.

Just an endless spuing of ad homs at this point. Ta ta..

Says the hypocrite who started the ad hominems:

And yet another ad hom..

Wrong bitch.

Wow..had to go all the way back to post #12 to find that!

[Syne]

Just an endless spuing of ad homs at this point. Ta ta..

Says the hypocrite who started the ad hominems:

And yet another ad hom..

No, your hypocrisy is fully and objectively demonstrated.

Says the hypocrite who started the ad hominems:

Wrong bitch.

Wow..had to go all the way back to post #12 to find that!

Yeah, that's the meaning of the word "started". Look, we know you can hardly read, but certainly you can get someone to explain simple sentences to you.

And it didn't end there:

Lying bitch..
...
Just admit it bitch.

What happened to "Ta ta.."? Just more lying?
And once again, you've managed to turn derail your own thread.

[Magical Realist]

No, your hypocrisy is fully and objectively demonstrated.

Yet another ad hom...

Look, we know you can hardly read, but certainly you can get someone to explain simple sentences to you.

Oops...there's another ad hom.

What happened to "Ta ta.."? Just more lying?

We're in ad hom wonderland now folks. This is what happens when you have nothing left to argue.

[Syne]

No, your hypocrisy is fully and objectively demonstrated.

Yet another ad hom...

Demonstrable facts are not ad hominems.

Look, we know you can hardly read, but certainly you can get someone to explain simple sentences to you.

Oops...there's another ad hom.

Yep, when you start the ad hominems in a thread, it's fair game until you apologize in that thread.
If you don't like it, quit starting it.

What happened to "Ta ta.."? Just more lying?

We're in ad hom wonderland now folks. This is what happens when you have nothing left to argue.

Again, a demonstrable lie cannot be an ad hominem.
But all your whining about it, while avoiding the bulk of what I've posted, is what happens when your whole argument boils down to: "Science is hard."

Or would you finally like to explain what happened to the photo mentioned in your OP?