What constitutes an individual organism in biology? (philosophy of science)


EXCERPT: [...] Most of the time the living world appears to us as manageable chunks. Even a toddler can see that. We know if we have one dog or two; at a pinch, we can probably count how many trees are growing in our backyard. Natural history museums started, in part, as embodiments of early scientific approaches to ordering and cataloguing the diversity of life. This is possible only because humans can usually intuitively pick out one organism from the next – that is, because most of the creatures we come across have pretty clear boundaries in space and time. When my daughter and I stood back and considered a herd of frozen elephants walking in a line at the museum, it was clear – even for a baby with its trunk wrapped tenderly around its mother’s – where one elephant ended and another began.

How come, then, the meaning of individuality is one of the oldest and most vexing problems in biology? For millennia, naturalists and philosophers have struggled to define the most fundamental units of living systems and to delimit the precise boundaries of the organisms that inhabit our planet. This difficulty is partly a product of the search for a singular theory that can be used to carve up all of the living world at its joints. But my view is that no such unified theory exists; there’s no single answer to the question: ‘What parts of the world are a part of you as a biological individual, and what parts are not?’ Different accounts of individuality pick out different boundaries, like an overlapping Venn diagram drawn on top of a network of biotic interactions. This isn’t because of uncertainty or a lack of information; rather, the living world just exists in such a way that we need more than one account of individuality to understand it....

MORE: https://aeon.co/essays/what-constitutes-...in-biology

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Another "revolution is coming" to explain consciousness (philosophy of science) C C 2 59 Nov 6, 2019 08:56 PM
Last Post: C C
  Religion vs Philosophy in 3 Minutes + Philosophy of Science with Hilary Putnam C C 2 74 Oct 16, 2019 05:26 PM
Last Post: C C
  The C-theory of time asks if time really has a direction (philosophy of science) C C 1 70 Aug 5, 2019 02:14 AM
Last Post: Quantum Quack
  Bring back science & philosophy as natural philosophy C C 0 122 May 15, 2019 02:21 AM
Last Post: C C
  Time for a robust defence of truth in science? (philosophy of science) C C 0 154 Mar 18, 2019 08:15 AM
Last Post: C C
  Blind spot of science is the neglect of lived experience (philosophy of science) C C 4 380 Jan 14, 2019 04:11 PM
Last Post: Secular Sanity
  (Philosophy of science videos) Laws of nature + After the end of evidence C C 8 320 Jan 8, 2019 08:55 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Einstein's God (philosophy of science) C C 0 232 Dec 4, 2018 07:58 PM
Last Post: C C
  New book argues life is inevitable via laws of nature (philosophy of science) C C 2 316 Nov 22, 2018 05:41 AM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos
  The return of Aristotelian views in philosophy & philosophy of science: Goodbye Hume? C C 1 273 Aug 17, 2018 02:01 PM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)