Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Kids? Just say no to procreation! (against innate breeder life style)

#1
C C Offline
https://aeon.co/essays/having-children-i...ts-immoral

EXCERPT: In 2006, I published a book called "Better Never to Have Been". I argued that coming into existence is always a serious harm. People should never, under any circumstance, procreate – a position called ‘anti-natalism’. In response, readers wrote letters of appreciation, support and, of course, there was outrage. But I also got this message, which is the most wrenching feedback I have received:

[...]

One does not have to be an anti-natalist to be moved by these words (which are quoted with permission). Some might be inclined to say my correspondent’s situation is an exceptional one, which should not incline us towards anti-natalism. However, severe suffering is not a rare phenomenon, and thus anti-natalism is a view that, at the very least, should be taken seriously and considered with an open mind.

The idea of anti-natalism is not new. In Sophocles’ Oedipus at Colonus, the chorus declares that ‘not to be born is, beyond all estimation, best’. A similar idea is expressed in Ecclesiastes. In the East, both Hinduism and Buddhism have a negative view of existence (even if they do not often go so far as to oppose procreation). Various thinkers since then have also recognised how pervasive suffering is, which moved them to explicitly oppose procreation: Arthur Schopenhauer might be the most famous, but others include Peter Wessel Zapffe, Emil Cioran and Hermann Vetter.

Anti-natalism will only ever be a minority view because it runs counter to a deep biological drive to have children. However, it is precisely because it is up against such odds that thoughtful people should pause and reflect rather than hastily dismiss it as mad or wicked. It is neither...

MORE: https://aeon.co/essays/having-children-i...ts-immoral
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article Neuralink’s FDA troubles are just the beginning ("Left sics the dogs on Elon" style) C C 8 247 Mar 23, 2024 03:22 AM
Last Post: Yazata
  Article John Horgan: My controversial diatribe against “skeptics” (skeptic of skeptics style) C C 0 54 Apr 13, 2023 11:00 PM
Last Post: C C
  Could good conditions persist if we worked just one day a week? Yes! (dumbass style) C C 4 134 Jun 29, 2022 02:16 AM
Last Post: Syne
  (paleofuture style) 1984 kids speculating about the year 2020 C C 0 263 Dec 29, 2018 05:35 PM
Last Post: C C
  Orwell knew: we willingly buy the screens that are used against us (Ingsoc style) C C 0 298 Jul 25, 2018 05:42 AM
Last Post: C C
  Noam Chomsky style + The Shat's style C C 0 540 Apr 5, 2017 04:11 PM
Last Post: C C
  Lark style versus Owl style: Sex, drugs, late nights, and psychopaths C C 0 786 Jul 21, 2016 05:34 AM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)