Vaccine refusal is fueling the spread of potentially deadly diseases

#1
http://scienceblogs.com/thepumphandle/20...-diseases/

EXCERPT: A recent study finds vaccine refusals have, indeed, accelerated the resurgence of whooping cough and measles here in the U.S. The findings are making headlines around the country — and comment sections are filling up with vitriol from anti-vaxxers — but it would feel amiss not to highlight the study on a blog dedicated to public health. But first, let’s remind ourselves of the pain and suffering that preceded vaccines. Here’s a brief snapshot of what life was like before vaccines and what it’s currently like for people without access to these life-saving medicines...

Also: One more time: Vaccine refusal endangers everyone, not just the unvaccinated
Reply
#2
"In the panic over measles’ spread in California and beyond, the public has been quick to blame vaccine refusers concentrated in wealthy, educated communities for being too ignorant to realize that measles can be a serious disease.

This charge, however, ignores the history of measles. It’s an intractable disease that, despite decades of vaccination, rebuffs our best efforts at elimination. And each time it flares up, its resurgence points out unresolved tensions between this country’s “haves” and “have-nots.”

When the first measles vaccine was released in 1963, vaccine developers and health officials were optimistic that it would be as widely used as the polio vaccine, which parents scrambled for when it first came out in the mid-1950s. But within just a few years, it was clear that only some segments of the population sought the new vaccine: predominantly white, middle- to upper-class families.

As a result, a California epidemiologist noted at the time, measles became “a disease of the Negro population and the population with Spanish surnames.” Across the country, measles began to cluster in poor urban areas. And as the decade progressed, the pattern only worsened.

When the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced a campaign to eradicate measles domestically via vaccination by the end of 1967, class disparities in measles infection rates provided part of the impetus. But the campaign, perhaps inadvertently, played to white, middle-class fears of diseases emanating from the “slums.” One cartoon depicted measles as a red-faced, yellow-eyed fiend who popped out of metal garbage cans left on the sidewalk and climbed through school windows to menace white children.

Nonetheless, the number of measles cases declined dramatically. But at the end of the 1960s they ticked up again. They were once again concentrated in urban "ghettos" and central city indigent areas. And blame for measles’ persistence was often placed squarely on the poor; on their purported ignorance of the disease, on their lifestyles, even on their living conditions in new urban high-rise apartments, where tight quarters fueled the disease’s spread.


Laws requiring measles and other vaccines for school were adopted in the early 1970s, in part because they promised to address class disparities. As a CDC immunization official noted, “To reach the single preschool child in the slum is difficult, but to mount a campaign to attain really high levels of immunization in … school should be relatively easy.” And it was. President Jimmy Carter’s administration announced a renewed campaign to eliminate measles later that decade. By 1980, 96 percent of all children were vaccinated against measles and cases fell to an all-time low in 1981.

But by the end of the 1980s, measles again climbed to epidemic heights. And again cases concentrated among minority children in inner cities. President George H.W. Bush proposed tying welfare payments to children’s vaccination status; the outbreaks, in this view, were a matter of personal responsibility. Democrats, meanwhile, tied the outbreaks to a health-care system that shut out the nation’s poor.

New federal funds for vaccinating poor and uninsured children drove measles rates way down in the 1990s. In 2000, the CDC declared the disease "eliminated”: measles still occurred, but only when brought into the United States from abroad. In recent years, however, the size of measles outbreaks has grown, as has the number of cases coming in from outside the country.

As in the past, today’s vitriolic rhetoric around the causes of measles’ return tells us something about class relations in our own time. Blaming purportedly selfish upper-middle class families reflects a collective cultural discomfort with the wealthy’s increasing ability to opt out of shared responsibility for community welfare.

But as we focus on the alleged selfishness of wealthy, overeducated vaccine skeptics, other factors at the root of the outbreak are, as in the past, getting lost in the conversation. Parents avoid or delay children’s vaccines for an array of reasons: poverty, other challenges accessing health care, medical reasons, religious beliefs and an ever-expanding list of required vaccines. Parental acceptance of some immunizations has eroded in recent decades precisely because the overall number of vaccines and vaccine doses required for children has grown to historically unprecedented levels."===https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-y...y-reasons/
Reply
#3
Vaccination has always been a double edged sword.  On the one hand creating widespread vaccination against a disease does indeed drive the number of potential hosts of the disease down which in turn causes it to be eradicated in heavily vaccinated areas. 

One of the problems however was that some of the early vaccinations were literally a giant test with no knowledge of the side effects through a persons development (Original studies might have been conducted on animals in laboratories, however nobody studying them was sitting around for decades before biopsying their subjects).  Therefore Clinical Trials were dressed as mass vaccinations and it begs to ask the question as to whether people that were vaccinated were actually given different strains or even placebo's (after all science implies that during any form of study such as this, you can't just pick one particular strain of vaccination as a potential without testing others)

This lead onto the concern that some vaccinations were causing dramatic changes in the development processes of people that had been vaccinated, in essence vaccination stepped into the realm of Eugenics as long term continued observation of those early studies proved that certain types of disability and disorder likely stemmed from those early vaccinations.

Most (if not all) of today's vaccinations are based upon those tests that were conducted so shouldn't generate the same effects as those early ones (but considering how genetics differs family from family, person to person you could never say that it was 100% safe)
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  New Alzheimer's vaccine Magical Realist 6 411 Dec 12, 2018 07:43 AM
Last Post: C C
  Gonorrhea researchers identify novel route to vaccine, new antibiotic C C 0 191 Jul 7, 2018 08:25 PM
Last Post: C C
  HIV vaccine Magical Realist 1 598 Nov 20, 2015 03:33 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)