Carney sacrificing Canada's sovereignty to the EU? (DIY emotion over logic)

#1
C C Offline
CONTRARIAN AI: Trump's MO is getting an opponent to become so enraged at him that they abandon careful decision-making for pursuing spite, automatically rejecting anything Trump advocates, and restlessly indulging in whatever they believe will annoy Trump. MAGA is just one-half of the satellites rotating fixatedly around Trump. An all-consuming fetish is a fetish, whether worship or unbridled rage.
- - - - - - - - - - -

LILLEY UNLEASHED (Toronto Sun)
https://youtu.be/C3nwlipVGIQ

VIDEO EXCERPTS: Canada should be expanding trade with the European Union, but by no means should we become a member, an associate member, or anything close to it.

[...] First is the issue of sovereignty. We would have to give up an awful lot of sovereignty to get the kind of access that Mark Carney's talking about. This isn't speculation. This is based on agreements that already exist.

Secondly, right now, we simply don't trade enough. We don't make the kinds of products that the Europeans want to buy. Our major exports are all built for the US. It would take us a long time to pivot in this direction.

And thirdly, the EU economy is not doing well and hasn't been for quite some time. In part due to kinds of regulations we would be subject to if we got what we're looking for.

[...] As I said, there is no associate member status within the European Union, but there are countries that are not full members but have deep trading access, which is what Carney's looking for, beyond a free trade agreement. [...] Well, let me just look at the Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein agreement for a moment.

[...] Are we going to accept that kind of language? Because that's what Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein had to do. The EU wants to control the regulations around products, around the environment, around consumer protection, around privacy. And some of those changes, if we were to accept European regulations, might be good. But some of them would be bad.

Either way, it's not our decision. It'll be made in Brussels. It'll be made in Strasbourg. From one of the agreements on the EU website, the same rules and conditions apply to all businesses within the EEA. That's the grouping of the EU and these other countries. EU legislation relating to the internal market is part of an EEA's countries' legislation.

The EU is the final arbiter of legislation, the final arbiter of regulation. They make the decisions. That's part of why Britain left the EU. Brexit was driven in part by crazy EU regulations. They wanted to get rid of fast-boiling kettles, and the British love their tea. They wanted to make all kinds of regulations that the British people said, "No, we're not in favor of that. We're in favor of free trade, but we don't want you regulating every part of our lives."

What level of integration is Mark Carney willing to give up? We don't know. He hasn't informed the Canadian public. He definitely hasn't informed Parliament, which hasn't sat in getting close to 100 days now, and won't sit until next week after he's already made his announced deals in Strasbourg at the European Parliament. He's speaking to the European Parliament about this before speaking to our own. On no planet does that make sense.

I know what the polling says. Mark Carney is at almost 50% according to the latest poll. That's driven in part because he's fighting Donald Trump. I know other polling is out. It shows 49% of Canadians want Canada to become a full EU member. Yeah. Let's ensure our sovereignty by giving it all up to Brussels. Makes no sense, but Canadian media is always telling you how bad the United States is and how great the EU is. So, no wonder that's kind of the thinking that we have.

80% of Canadians believe we should draw closer to Europe. Yes, but not this close. What? I don't want to get married to Europe. We are not Europe. But it's only going to help Carney's polling, and he's going to be going up as a result of this. But is it the right direction? I'm going to be the one on the outside saying, "No." I know it's not a popular view, but this is not the direction that Canada should be taking. It's going to be the popular one, but it's not the well-informed one.

Carney’s Euro dreams headed in the wrong direction ... https://youtu.be/C3nwlipVGIQ

https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/C3nwlipVGIQ
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The U.S. chooses favorites: North Korea over South Korea (DIY spite?) C C 0 114 Aug 27, 2026 11:14 PM
Last Post: C C
  EU to make its move before France can obstruct its sovereignty? (DIY resistance) C C 0 177 Jul 13, 2026 10:19 PM
Last Post: C C
  French rage over murder of Lyhanna and other failed responses (DIY) C C 0 274 Jun 12, 2026 01:04 AM
Last Post: C C
  Article Trump rips UK over Chagos Islands deal: says it shows weakness (DIY transaction) C C 16 1,063 Feb 19, 2026 03:50 AM
Last Post: Yazata
  Article UK PM Starmer’s chief of staff quits over Mandelson links to Epstein (DIY dismissal) C C 3 401 Feb 9, 2026 03:13 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Article DIY: Why has Japan deployed fighter jets to NATO bases in the US, Canada, & Europe? C C 0 639 Sep 23, 2025 03:08 AM
Last Post: C C
  Article Starmer’s DIY move on Palestine statehood + Anger at Israel washes over Netanyahu C C 10 1,833 Aug 1, 2025 06:09 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Article DIY: Canada’s Liberal Party is already thinking about how to remove Mark Carney C C 1 1,069 May 27, 2025 03:51 AM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos
  Article CBS settles lawsuit filed over its positive discrimination practices (DIY payback) C C 1 776 Apr 23, 2025 09:27 PM
Last Post: C C
  Will the US and Canada actually merge? (DIY analysis) C C 6 1,436 Mar 9, 2025 10:59 PM
Last Post: Syne



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)