No one, other than the LGBT, introduce themselves by who they are attracted to or their gender. Even Christians don't regularly go around introducing themselves as "hi, I'm so and so and I'm a Christian," even though the linchpin of your worldview would be much more informative. Of course, the LGBT do seem to make that part of them central to their worldview. So unless one is conservative, there's really not much difference between saying you're LGBT or saying you're a Democrat, worldview-wise.
(52 minutes ago)C C Wrote: Though I don't see how Kirk could justifiably classify the latter a "lifestyle", since it's a monogamous relationship (and apparently not just in terms of mere appearance). Not that he did do that, but his kind of playing loose in assuming a stranger is automatically part of a promiscuous "lifestyle" just because of the orientation sort of suggests he might have done similarly with Rubin.
The "lifestyle," for a Christian, is living outside of God's will. Promiscuity is objectively worse, but homosexuality is still a Biblically sin.
It would be hypocritical for a Christian to disapprove of promiscuity but then approve of something else the Bible forbids.