Article  New Trump vaccine order based on “no credible scientific evidence,” doctors say

#1
C C Offline
https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/06/d...r-denmark/

EXCERPTS: “There is no credible scientific evidence to support,” such a change, AMA President Bobby Mukkamala said in a statement. The current vaccine schedule “is built on decades of rigorous research and real-world data, and it is designed to protect children in the US when they are most vulnerable based on our nation’s disease burden,” he said.

[...] While the federal government is appealing that injunction, the new executive order on Friday reaffirms Kennedy’s plans to adopt Denmark’s strategy, calling for “realigning” US vaccine policy with “best practices from peer, developed countries."It states that the scientific assessment written by Høeg and Kulldorff is a “guiding resource for the Federal Government” and that the CDC shall ” take any appropriate steps to update the United States childhood and adolescent vaccine schedule.”

As before, the AMA is strongly against the unilateral change made without backing from scientific evidence.

“Altering [the vaccine schedule] without clear, evidence-based justification risks continued confusion for parents and patients, undermining trust in vaccines, and ultimately lowering vaccination rates,” Mukkamala said. “That would put more children and communities at risk of preventable illness.”

On Monday, the American College of Physicians also released a statement, saying it was “deeply concerned” by Trump’s order. “This is the second time the administration has attempted to unilaterally substitute vaccine guidance from other countries to replace the US vaccine schedule which was developed for the specific needs of the US population,” ACP President Jan Carney said. “The changes that this executive order directs cannot be allowed to move forward.”

Even researchers in Denmark find the move bizarre. Anders Hviid, who leads research on vaccine safety and effectiveness at the Statens Serum Institut, Denmark’s equivalent of the CDC, told The New York Times in December that it did not make sense to compare the US to Denmark. “It’s not at all fair to say look at Denmark unless you can match the other characteristics of Denmark,” he said.

Hviid also told the Times that the US public health policies under Kennedy “get crazier and crazier” by the month. “It is surreal, and it is difficult, from a Danish perspective, to understand what’s going on.” (MORE - missing details)
Reply
#2
Syne Offline
Less vaccinations means less money for doctors, who the AMA represent, and pharmaceutical companies.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article Tests to detect marijuana-impaired driving based on ‘pseudoscience’ C C 0 480 Jun 30, 2025 03:34 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Quantum University misuses physics to train fake doctors C C 0 537 Jan 4, 2025 06:32 PM
Last Post: C C
  These new scientific fraud cases worry me: Now also in material science. (Sabine) C C 0 604 Oct 12, 2024 08:28 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article University wholly ditches merit-based hiring, favoring gender, “looks”, & personality C C 4 1,157 Nov 21, 2023 02:17 PM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos
  Article Fresh evidence of ChatGPT’s political bias revealed by comprehensive new study C C 2 742 Aug 17, 2023 12:45 PM
Last Post: stryder
  Article Consequences of New York's pesticide ban + Anatomy of a scientific scandal C C 0 514 Jun 16, 2023 06:33 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Why race-based health care is bad medicine: from BiDil to kidney transplants C C 0 547 Mar 30, 2023 05:19 PM
Last Post: C C
  Controlled experiments show doctors dismissing evidence due to ideology C C 1 580 Feb 11, 2023 01:24 AM
Last Post: confused2
  The FDA needs to take another look at laser-based 'vaginal rejuvenation' C C 0 453 Feb 23, 2022 07:41 PM
Last Post: C C
  A 3rd option for political based science misrepresentation? C C 1 623 Sep 8, 2021 09:09 PM
Last Post: Syne



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)