NATO is in danger

#1
Syne Offline

NATO is in far bigger danger than anyone realizes. And the reason has nothing to do with defense budgets.
The real danger is psychological. It’s cultural.
Europeans didn’t just free-ride on American security for 80 years. They built an entire identity around the idea that they evolved past the Americans protecting them.
That identity is now the single biggest obstacle to Western survival. And the darkest irony is: we helped build it.
After World War II, Europe wasn’t just economically shattered. Its culture was in ruins. The cities, the universities, the concert halls, the museums. Rubble.
The Marshall Plan rebuilt the economy. But culture wasn’t a priority. Not at first.
Then the Iron Curtain dropped. And suddenly culture became a weapon.
American diplomats, academics, artists & scholars flooded Western Europe. We funded their universities. Supported their orchestras. Rebuilt their museums. Promoted their intellectual life.
Not because European culture needed saving for its own sake.
Because Eastern Europeans were struggling for Maslow’s mist basic needs.
We needed the view from the other side of that Wall to be intoxicating.
So America built Western Europe into a showcase of self-actualization. Art. Philosophy. Cafe culture. Long vacations. Universities where people studied literature instead of surviving.
We were manufacturing jealousy.
And it worked. The Wall came down.
But here’s what no one accounted for.
When you give a society self-actualization on someone else’s tab long enough, they forget it was a gift. They start believing it was organically theirs.
And when they look at the country that funded it all, a country busy building aircraft carriers and semiconductor fabs and shale fields instead of reaching the Maslow’s pinnacle.
An overweight American in a ball cap who can’t tell Monet from Pissarro. Who eats fast food. Who drives a truck. Who builds strip malls instead of piazzas.
And to a culture trained in aesthetics but stripped of strategic awareness, that American looks uncivilized.
So the arrogance takes root. And once a culture decides another is beneath them, they stop listening.
Americans say wars are sometimes necessary: crude.
Oil is the backbone of prosperity: unsophisticated.
Kids build companies in garages that reshape the planet: crass.
Wall Street finances the global economy: vulgar.
Europe has no world-class technology sector. No military capable of strong defense. No energy independence. No AI capacity.
What Europe has is culture. The culture we paid for at the expense of us reaching Maslow’s pinnacle.
For decades that was fine. We funded the museums, protected the sea lanes, and tolerated the sneering because the arrangement worked.
Then Europeans stopped keeping the contempt private. They started saying it to our faces. In their media. In their parliaments. At every international forum. “Americans are stupid.
Americans are violent. Americans are a threat to democracy.”
We could have moved the Louvre to NY. We could have built a Venice here. We could have stolen your best artists, designers, philosophers and more… like your conquering armies did for centuries.
Instead we funded them. And all we asked for in return was to let us visit.
You don’t have the military to defend your borders. You don’t have the technology to compete. You don’t have the energy to heat your homes without begging dictators.
What you have is an 80-year superiority complex FUNDED BY AMERICANS, protected by American soldiers, and built on the false belief that self-actualization is civilization.
It isn’t. Civilization is the ability to sustain itself. By that measure, Europe isn’t a civilization at all. It’s a dependency with better wine.
That’s not a threat. It’s a weather report.
Build a Navy. Or don’t. But stop lecturing the people who made you “better than us”
Our “crudeness” our “stunted liberal education” our “ugly strip malls” are because we sacrificed our culture to support yours.
- https://www.facebook.com/HouseOfCommonSe...2dvuK8RQbl

Reply
#2
stryder Offline
(Apr 10, 2026 07:43 AM)Syne Wrote:

NATO is in far bigger danger than anyone realizes. And the reason has nothing to do with defense budgets.
The real danger is psychological. It’s cultural.
Europeans didn’t just free-ride on American security for 80 years. They built an entire identity around the idea that they evolved past the Americans protecting them.
That identity is now the single biggest obstacle to Western survival. And the darkest irony is: we helped build it.
After World War II, Europe wasn’t just economically shattered. Its culture was in ruins. The cities, the universities, the concert halls, the museums. Rubble.
The Marshall Plan rebuilt the economy. But culture wasn’t a priority. Not at first.
Then the Iron Curtain dropped. And suddenly culture became a weapon.
American diplomats, academics, artists & scholars flooded Western Europe. We funded their universities. Supported their orchestras. Rebuilt their museums. Promoted their intellectual life.
Not because European culture needed saving for its own sake.
Because Eastern Europeans were struggling for Maslow’s mist basic needs.
We needed the view from the other side of that Wall to be intoxicating.
So America built Western Europe into a showcase of self-actualization. Art. Philosophy. Cafe culture. Long vacations. Universities where people studied literature instead of surviving.
We were manufacturing jealousy.
And it worked. The Wall came down.
But here’s what no one accounted for.
When you give a society self-actualization on someone else’s tab long enough, they forget it was a gift. They start believing it was organically theirs.
And when they look at the country that funded it all, a country busy building aircraft carriers and semiconductor fabs and shale fields instead of reaching the Maslow’s pinnacle.
An overweight American in a ball cap who can’t tell Monet from Pissarro. Who eats fast food. Who drives a truck. Who builds strip malls instead of piazzas.
And to a culture trained in aesthetics but stripped of strategic awareness, that American looks uncivilized.
So the arrogance takes root. And once a culture decides another is beneath them, they stop listening.
Americans say wars are sometimes necessary: crude.
Oil is the backbone of prosperity: unsophisticated.
Kids build companies in garages that reshape the planet: crass.
Wall Street finances the global economy: vulgar.
Europe has no world-class technology sector. No military capable of strong defense. No energy independence. No AI capacity.
What Europe has is culture. The culture we paid for at the expense of us reaching Maslow’s pinnacle.
For decades that was fine. We funded the museums, protected the sea lanes, and tolerated the sneering because the arrangement worked.
Then Europeans stopped keeping the contempt private. They started saying it to our faces. In their media. In their parliaments. At every international forum. “Americans are stupid.
Americans are violent. Americans are a threat to democracy.”
We could have moved the Louvre to NY. We could have built a Venice here. We could have stolen your best artists, designers, philosophers and more… like your conquering armies did for centuries.
Instead we funded them. And all we asked for in return was to let us visit.
You don’t have the military to defend your borders. You don’t have the technology to compete. You don’t have the energy to heat your homes without begging dictators.
What you have is an 80-year superiority complex FUNDED BY AMERICANS, protected by American soldiers, and built on the false belief that self-actualization is civilization.
It isn’t. Civilization is the ability to sustain itself. By that measure, Europe isn’t a civilization at all. It’s a dependency with better wine.
That’s not a threat. It’s a weather report.
Build a Navy. Or don’t. But stop lecturing the people who made you “better than us”
Our “crudeness” our “stunted liberal education” our “ugly strip malls” are because we sacrificed our culture to support yours.
- https://www.facebook.com/HouseOfCommonSe...2dvuK8RQbl


What a load of self actualising horseshit.

If someone is going to go to great lengths to write up on a subject, they should at least do the research on the subject they pick. The problem is this is the usual low quality crap that gets posted on social networks and even finds its way getting posted to research sites etc. It should stop, but since dumb people exist it continues.

For the prospect of research sake, did the writer ever leave his home state (ever or) to actually visit Europe? Have they ever been to any of the countries?

It's made out to be "Funded by Americans" what they don't mention is how many years the "Borrowed" funds paid back revenue to the US in an increased amount. It's part of the reason that the US had a great deal of economic stability for decades, at least until the borrowed amounts were paid back.

The problem is there is only so long you can squeeze the same citrus fruit and expect to get a cordial from it.
Reply
#3
Syne Offline
Notice how the European doesn't actually rebut any point in the OP.
The OP didn't claim Europe didn't repay anything. But it does make the point that Europe has never paid for US protection since WWII.

Between 1946 and the early 1960s, European nations repaid a portion of the over $44.5 billion in US aid (loans and grants) received post-WWII. While over 90% of Marshall Plan aid was grants, not requiring repayment, loans were repaid over decades, often at low-interest rates. West Germany repaid one-third of its assistance.
...
Yes, the Marshall Plan loans were repaid with interest rates that were generally lower than inflation, making the real interest rate very low or even negative in some cases.
- Google AI


Yep, Europe's managed decline has been going on for a long time. Can't get much out of failing societies.
Reply
#4
confused2 Offline
I don't think it matters why the average American thinks what it thinks .. the result is the same.
Whether it is the resentment a parent feels for the child that is lazy and selfish or just the knowledge that the Trump-Kennedy Memorial Centre is mocked 'everywhere' - it makes no difference.
Reply
#5
Magical Realist Offline
I see these diatribes all the time on Facebook. And they all have the feel of being AI generated. Which totally makes sense. I don't believe any American has such resentment and hate for our European brothers and sisters. And the need to bombastically over-justify it all speaks volumes, like it didn't know when to quit.
Reply
#6
C C Offline
Ironically, globalism was a kind of bribery introduced by the US in order get and ensure most of the world stayed on its side. The US provided the security and aid, and in return Europe (and the rest) offered their loyalty as partners. That's why they're befuddled by Trump's demands that sycophancy is no longer sufficient. Or, it's been so long that the original deal and exchange of benefits has faded in memory for all parties concerned. (Certainly for Trump, as he was grumbling about the one-way street nature of it way back in the 1980s, on television appearances.) Or the old Cold War situation is just too passé now.


Globalism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globalism#Concept

By the late 1940s, the modern concept of globalism was formed in the United States.

In their position of unprecedented power, US planners formulated policies to shape the kind of postwar world they wanted, which in economic terms meant a globe-spanning capitalist order centered exclusively upon the United States. This was the period when its global power was at its peak: the United States was the greatest economic power the world had known, with the greatest military machine in history.

In February 1948, George F. Kennan's Policy Planning Staff said: "[W]e have about 50% of the world's wealth but only 6.3% of its population. ... Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity."

America's allies and foes in Eurasia were still recovering from World War II at this time. Historian James Peck has described this version of globalism as "visionary globalism". Per Peck, this was a far-reaching conception of "American-centric state globalism using capitalism as a key to its global reach, integrating everything that it can into such an undertaking". This included global economic integration, which had collapsed under World War I and the Great Depression.
- - - - - - - - -

AI: After WWII, the United States took on the responsibility of protecting global shipping lanes, which was crucial for international trade and security. In return, many nations became allies, benefiting from U.S. naval power to ensure the safety of their maritime commerce.

The U.S. strategy of ensuring free navigation has led to a more interconnected world, where countries can trade freely without the fear of maritime disruptions. This approach has solidified the U.S. position as a leader in global affairs and has encouraged other nations to collaborate in maintaining maritime security.
- - - - - - - - -

Globalization After WWII
https://www.shortform.com/blog/globaliza...fter-wwii/

The US, with its geographic protections and abundant natural resources, emerged from World War II as the only remaining country with a robust economy, a functioning industrial sector, and a strong military. Zeihan says that, instead of asserting itself as an empire, the US used its advantage to create a new world order—one aimed at isolating and economically strangling the Soviet Union. The US offered the world a deal: Align against the Soviet Union, and in return, the US would become the world’s police to ensure that international trade could flourish—except in the Soviet bloc.

(Shortform note: Though the alliance Zeihan describes is often remembered as a struggle between communism and capitalism, the US government was willing to cooperate with communist nations so long as they were aligned against the Soviet Union. Specifically, the US maintained economic and diplomatic ties with communist governments in Yugoslavia, Somalia, and China at various points during the Cold War. This suggests the conflict was less about opposing communism and more about opposing the Soviets and their allies.)

Zeihan asserts that, during this period, we’ve lived in an era of unprecedented economic growth and stability facilitated by the US’s commitment to protecting worldwide trade and transportation. As a result, many previously undeveloped countries were able to industrialize rapidly and join the global market. These formerly agrarian nations now house a growing number of their people in cities, where power, water, and food must be sourced from elsewhere. To date, that’s been comparatively easy, since for over 70 years, the US Navy has safeguarded global shipping.
- - - - - - - - - -

Globalism refers to the ideology and understanding of the interconnectedness of the modern world, while globalization is the process of increasing or decreasing that interconnectedness. Globalism can be seen as the underlying framework, whereas globalization describes the dynamic changes in global interactions.
Reply
#7
Syne Offline
Leftists love modern globalism. So it's no wonder they fail to see the discrepancy between Europeans crowing their superiority while being completely unable to defend themself, whether militarily or even culturally... as they import cultures antithetical to Western values.
Reply
#8
confused2 Offline
Syne Wrote:Europeans crowing their superiority
Something a bit odd going on there. The Kennedy Memorial Centre was a thing .. Trump rebranded it .. could be the Hooters Memorial Centre now. Can't blame Europeans for that.
Reply
#9
Magical Realist Offline
Quote:as they import cultures antithetical to Western values.

"Western values" is a dogwhistle for white judeo-christian supremacism.
Reply
#10
confused2 Offline
(Apr 10, 2026 11:59 PM)Magical Realist Wrote:
Quote:as they import cultures antithetical to Western values.
"Western values" is a dogwhistle for white judeo-christian supremacism.
That explains it - thanks.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article Sorting out ties between EU's own defense initiative & so-called NATO "delinquency" C C 0 510 Mar 17, 2024 07:47 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)