(Jun 13, 2026 09:46 PM)Syne Wrote: Quit sperging, clown.
It's intellectually dishonest to argue a strawman while pretending to criticize the original claim.
Sorry, I was trying to keep it conceptually simple .. obviously failed. Now I'm going to try using multiplication (and division)
She claims the chances of infection are 0.04%. << MY MISTAKE .. see end
Apply that to a population of 340 million and she predicts 136,000 infections .. is that what you think happened? I can't know, just asking.
Corrected.. she claims the chances of infection are 0.04% +0.74% =0.78%
Apply that to a population of 340 million and she predicts about 2.6 million infections .. is that what you think happened? I can't know, just asking.
AI..
"The United States recorded an estimated 1.3 to 1.4 million excess deaths during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic from March 2020 through May 2023. Over 90% of these excess deaths were directly attributed to the virus, while the remainder resulted from pandemic-related disruptions to healthcare.."
So about 50% of people with covid died? 50% chance of survival?