Research  Boll weevil plague brought benefits for Black sons born after the changes it caused

#1
C C Offline
Study: Arrival of boll weevils in U.S. South in early 20th century brought long-term benefits for Black sons born after the agricultural shock
https://academic.oup.com/ej/advance-arti...ogin=false

PRESS RELEASE: Black-White inequality declined during much of the 20th century as measured by wages and intergenerational mobility. Scholars have attributed this to a variety of reasons, most notably Black migration and increases in Black people’s education levels. In a new study, researchers investigated the long-term impact of the boll weevil, an agricultural pest that destroys cotton crops, which invaded the South in the early 20th century and spurred significant economic changes. They found that this agricultural shock brought about long-term advantages for Black sons born after the boll weevil appeared.

The study, by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University and Marquette University, appears in The Economic Journal.

“Our work sheds new light on the improvement in the economic status of Black men in the first half of the 20th century,” says Karen Clay, professor of economics and public policy at Carnegie Mellon’s Heinz College, who coauthored the study. “Most research has focused on education and migration to the North; we looked at the factors that led to improvement by showing that a large agricultural shock, the boll weevil, generated long-term benefits for Black sons born after its arrival.”

Starting in 1892, the boll weevil began to spread gradually through the cotton-growing region of the United States, infesting all such areas by 1922. As a result, total cotton production fell as much as 50%, affecting nearly a third of the U.S. population and 75% of the Black population, as many farm owners ended or changed tenancy contracts and many households migrated from their counties.

In this study, researchers used cross-Census links from the Census Tree, the largest database of record ties among historical U.S. censuses, with more than 700 million links for U.S. residents between 1850 and 1940. They examined changes in earnings, occupations, family makeup, and residences, among other measures, for Black males born before and after the boll weevil’s appearance.

The pest’s arrival benefited Black sons in the long term, as reflected in two 1940 measures of income—wages and attributed income—and did not harm White sons, and these differential gains decreased inequality, the study found. In a variety of ways, early life conditions may have improved for Black sons relative to White sons. More specifically:
  • Compared to White sons, Black sons born after the agricultural shock experienced relative increases in wages of 11% and relative increases in imputed incomes of 5%. These gains were not driven by migration out of the South; Black sons who remained in the South also had increased wages and incomes.

  • These differential gains pushed down inequality as measured by wages and income rank. The gains in Black sons’ wages and imputed incomes were substantial, accounting for 6% to 15% of the Black-White wage gap in 1940. Estimates from analyses of intergenerational mobility show that being born after the boll weevil appeared boosted Black sons’ imputed income rank by 1 and had a negative but insignificant effect on White sons’ imputed income rank, representing a 12% rise in average income rank for Black sons.

  • These surprising improvements appear to have occurred through a range of mechanisms related to the boll weevil. Black sons may have benefited from their fathers’ migration and occupational upgrading; improvements in nutrition and schooling; increases in household resources available to sons, including reductions in the number of children in the household; and reductions in racial violence.
“Our study provides new evidence of the effect of the boll weevil on Black-White wages and intergenerational mobility, as well as on changes in Black fathers’ labor market conditions relative to White fathers and the impact this had on their sons,” explains Ethan J. Schmick, assistant professor of economics at Marquette University, who coauthored the study. “Our work also contributes new evidence on Black individuals’ and White individuals’ early life conditions during an important and understudied historical period, highlighting the role of a range of market mechanisms in mitigating shocks.”
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Research Livestock played a role in prehistoric plague infections C C 0 360 Aug 11, 2025 06:10 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Two former slaves born in 1842 & 1852 talk about the 1850s C C 0 281 Jul 19, 2023 12:41 PM
Last Post: C C
  Syphilis was in Europe long before explorers brought it home from the Americas C C 0 308 Jul 15, 2022 04:55 PM
Last Post: C C
  The 5 million-year-old woolly mammoth is being brought back to life C C 1 412 Feb 12, 2022 04:31 AM
Last Post: Kornee
  The English village of Eyam...and the plague Leigha 1 444 Jan 10, 2022 01:47 AM
Last Post: C C
  Plague reshaped New England B4 Mayflower arrived + Were there female Viking warriors? C C 0 331 Nov 28, 2021 11:00 PM
Last Post: C C
  Viking longship was engineering marvel + Plague victims did receive individual burial C C 0 492 Jun 17, 2021 11:39 PM
Last Post: C C
  Native Americans did not make large-scale changes to environment prior to Europeans C C 1 677 Jan 22, 2020 05:38 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Strong winter dust storms may have caused the collapse of the Akkadian Empire C C 0 482 Oct 26, 2019 05:42 PM
Last Post: C C
  Doomed 19th-Century Arctic Expedition Wasn't Brought Down by Lead Poisoning C C 1 782 Aug 30, 2018 06:40 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)