Article  We can't value ‘ancient wisdom’ over scientific fact + Georgia Tech's funding adapts

#1
C C Offline
We can't value ‘ancient wisdom’ over scientific fact
https://www.realclearscience.com/article...32188.html

EXCERPTS: Over the past decade there has been an explosion of interest in indigenous knowledge. The United States, Canada, Australia, and South Africa have been at the forefront of the movement to integrate ‘ancient wisdom’ with modern science and decision-making by applying it to everything from public health to climate change. The appeal is both understandable and alluring.

[...] While these achievements deserve respect, many practices promoted under the banner of indigenous knowledge lack scientific merit and should be approached with caution...

[...] Nowhere has the trend of embracing indigenous knowledge gained more of a foothold in mainstream institutions than in New Zealand where the government has given it equal status with science in the school qualification system...

[...] Indigenous traditions deserve respect but they must be held to the same rigorous standard as other bodies of knowledge... (MORE -details)


Not Every Idea Deserves Equal Time
https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/not-e...ion-debate

EXCERPT: The broader chapter from which this text is excerpted explains why creationist appeals resonated: mistrust of scientific elites, frustration with unresponsive education policy, and the caricature — fueled by misreadings of Thomas Kuhn — that science is a closed-minded “club.” Against this backdrop, Kitcher sketches what genuine tolerance in science looks like: Pursue the best-supported theories, allow minority views that show promise, but reject those that fail the test... (MORE - details)


In the Trump era, Georgia Tech is teaching other universities a fundraising lesson
https://www.wsj.com/us-news/education/ge..._permalink

EXCERPT: “They’re in many ways a model for the 21st century university,” said Andrew Read, senior vice president for research at Pennsylvania State University, referring to Georgia Tech’s approach to industry partnerships. Realistically, Read and others don’t expect company investments to fully replace federal funding for science, but with budgets at risk they feel compelled to look elsewhere for support. (MORE - details)
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Contrary to narrative, a lot of government science funding doesn't go to science C C 0 358 Jul 16, 2025 08:33 PM
Last Post: C C
  Bias in science can & must be exposed + Dangerous myth of value-free science C C 0 462 Nov 30, 2024 12:15 AM
Last Post: C C
  Article The rat race for research funding delays scientific progress (climate change) C C 0 439 Aug 17, 2024 04:52 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article The ruthless politicization of science funding C C 0 578 Aug 5, 2024 06:56 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Credibility crisis in science + How logic & reasoning can fail as scientific tools C C 0 392 Mar 22, 2024 04:18 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article "Nature" falls for autism pseudoscience + Politically skewered research funding C C 0 355 May 17, 2023 05:16 PM
Last Post: C C
  When fact checking goes wrong + Non-GMO labels lead to lawsuits (ignoring science) C C 0 348 Feb 1, 2022 07:30 PM
Last Post: C C
  Funding isn't enough to fix science C C 0 436 May 30, 2021 02:30 AM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)