Article  The ruthless politicization of science funding

#1
C C Offline
https://robertpgeorge.com/articles/the-r...e-funding/

EXCERPT: These requirements to incorporate DEI into each research proposal are alarming. They constitute compelled speech; they undermine the academic freedom of researchers; they dilute merit-based criteria for funding; they incentivize unethical — and, indeed, sometimes illegal — discriminatory hiring practices; they erode public trust in science; and they contribute to administrative overload and bloat.

Instructions to applicants and examples of successful proposals make it abundantly clear that DEI plans must adhere to a specific ideological doctrine. According to NASA, “the assessment of the Inclusion Plan will be based on […] the extent to which the Inclusion Plan demonstrated awareness of systemic barriers to creating inclusive working environments that are specific to the proposal team.”

Thus, to get funding, scientists must declare that their own institution and research groups are uninclusive and discriminatory, which is an offense to the many scientists who have worked hard to ensure fair and transparent hiring practices in their institutions. These requirements effectively constitute DEI loyalty oaths as prerequisite for funding... (MORE - details)
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article The rat race for research funding delays scientific progress (climate change) C C 0 152 Aug 17, 2024 04:52 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article "Nature" falls for autism pseudoscience + Politically skewered research funding C C 0 111 May 17, 2023 05:16 PM
Last Post: C C
  Funding isn't enough to fix science C C 0 146 May 30, 2021 02:30 AM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)