Check⁉️ Pride fatigue in the UK? (antiquated fashions)

[Syne]

IOW..your study was thoroughly debunked. As summarized here:

No data, just hedging language throughout.

Some researchers seem to be drawing conclusions about a perceived connection of abuse leading to sexual identity versus identity leading to an increased likelihood of victimization. These researchers were likely operating within a heteronormative paradigm perspective, believing that heterosexuality is normal or healthy, and thus any deviation from heterosexuality is abnormal. This bias would then lead the researchers to conclusions that see causation instead of correlation.”

You can't know that for a fact

It is a fact as evidenced by the 9 examples given.

You're an intellectually dishonesty moron. You can't even seem to comprehend basic epistemological distinctions.

Just arguments from ignorance and personal bias and bigotry.

[Magical Realist]

You're an intellectually dishonesty moron. You can't even seem to comprehend basic epistemological distinctions.

Oooo...that's such a profound epistemological statement! lol

---

One "seem" or "likely" from an unbiased scientist is more reliable than a dozen "must be's" from an agenda-pushing homophobe.

[Syne]

You're an intellectually dishonesty moron. You can't even seem to comprehend basic epistemological distinctions.

Oooo...that's such a profound epistemological statement! lol

---

One "seem" or "likely" from an unbiased scientist is more reliable than a dozen "must be's" from an agenda-pushing homophobe.

Basic scientific distinctions between objective and subjective evidence... of course, completely lost on you.
Lots of hedging language from an admittedly personally motivated source, versus data-driven research you ad hom... again, from personal motives.

9_9