Miami airshow uap coming out of the water

[Magical Realist]

As always, poor video quality, dropping frames and blurring the image.
The jet in the video is also not shaped like any known jet, as the poor video quality makes the shiny canopy look huge.
But most people realize that poor video quality distorts a lot of things, especially when moving fast, at a distance, or at high contrast.
Plenty of birds have white, or light colored, underbellies. Plenty of birds can fly fast, especially when relatively close.

Gullible morons.

I didn't say underbellies. I said wings. And no bird travels so fast that it can't be picked up on camera. So that basically blows your bird theory out of the water. And then there's this:

"We submitted the source files to a videographer to analyze. He was able to extract the metadata from the files and found nothing unusual, expressing doubts that the videos had been altered. But he also was unable to rule out the possibility from that single view that the object in the video may have been “either a bird, not far out from the people swimming, or a bug much closer to the camera.” He went on to point out that the flickering appearance of the object suggests “wings flapping very quickly. Roughly 18 flaps in a half-second – which would really make a case for an insect flying by close to the camera.”

Of course it can't be a bug either since bugs don't come out of the water. Hence uap.

[Syne]

Many birds have matching under wing and underbelly. It's why we often paint military aircraft dark on top and light on bottom. It's camouflage.
Again, poor video quality, that drops frames, will miss a lot of fast motion. That's why we have fast shutter speeds and high frame rate cameras, specifically designed to catch fast motion.

Who said the video was altered?

You're intellectually dishonest to cite someone saying, “either a bird, not far out from the people swimming, or a bug much closer to the camera” and then denying it could be a bug.
Again, the video doesn't actually show it coming out of the water. Like you're previous article said: "Then something small enters the frame, perhaps having emerged from the water, though that is unclear."

As usual, you make a ton of claims based on pure assumption. In this case, not even supported by your own citations. 9_9

[Magical Realist]

Many birds have matching under wing and underbelly.

Show me a dark colored bird that flies at the beach with white wings. Ofcourse it doesn't even matter since the estimated flapping rate, assuming it was wings, was 18 flaps per half a second. Which again totally rules out birds.

Again, the video doesn't actually show it coming out of the water.

LOL Backpedaling on the bird catching a fish theory I see.

It's flying vertically from the water. There's nowhere else for it have come from than the water. Hence uap and not a bug..

[Syne]

Learn to read, illiterate. I said "under wing." But then, I never claimed the flashes were from wings (your straw man). I actually literally said the flashes could come from a struggling fish. But there are sea birds with white under wings as well.

It comes from the edge of the screen. That's all we really know. It's certainly doesn't come from near the horizon, like your article tried to pull.

As usual, you don't cite the parts of your own article that rebut your claims: "After further analysis, the videographer still felt that a bug or bird was the “most likely” explanation."
So you're obviously cherry-picking what you want, even from the very same videographer.

I'm happy to entertain that it might be a bug very close to the camera. On the beach, a bug (or even a bird) would easily be propelled even faster by the incoming ocean wind.

[Magical Realist]

"That analysis appears to assume that the object is closer to the beach when it appears based on the fact that the apparent size (to the view of the camera) increases by a factor of five in terms of the number of pixels comprising it. This also would rule out the possibility of it being an insect flying in front of the camera in the view of this analyst. Had it been coming from over the horizon, it would have had to have been traveling at an almost unimaginable speed to reach the beach in barely two seconds. Further, there are several frames near the beginning of the clip where the object is seen with the ocean behind it rather than the sky, likely eliminating the theory of a high-altitude craft.

Of additional interest is the apparent “flashing” of the object when observed in slow motion. Some have speculated that this suggests an irregularly shaped object exhibiting rotation, with one reflective surface periodically flashing sunlight toward the camera. Others are speculating that it could be a blinking light, though the frequency of the blinking would be very rapid. We can consider this as a possible alternate explanation to the “flapping wings” theory.

As mentioned above, however, once Sugarman’s video began to go viral, other attendees went back to review their own videos and photos, discovering that they too had captured the unusual object. There was another flyover by a B-52 bomber in the same area. And more videos appear to show the same curious object flying in close proximity to the B-52. Watch this video posted by YouTube user Horis Box. Watch closely at roughly the 40-second mark and you will see what appears to be the same object flying below the bomber, heading north.

https://youtu.be/QEcDNF833Qc

These additional recordings provide more context that was missing from the original Sugarman video. The object was visible from different angles, potentially casting doubt on the idea that it was a bug flying in front of a single camera. It was not far off on the horizon. It was relatively small, at least as compared to the jets, but was able to accelerate upward at a steep angle and speed that no bird should be able to achieve. This is a truly puzzling sighting with multiple witnesses capturing video of the event, most of them not even realizing that it had happened.

So what was the object (or objects) captured on video at the 2022 Miami Air and Sea Show? As with all such sightings, the conclusion is left to the observer unless additional (preferably physical) data comes to light. But it remains an intriguing addition to the growing body of UAP data being accumulated outside the vaults of the United States government."

[Syne]

Watch closely at roughly the 40-second mark and you will see what appears to be the same object flying below the bomber, heading north.

https://youtu.be/QEcDNF833Qc

That is so obviously a bird that you have to be a fully delusional true believer to deny it. And if you can't tell that's an obvious bird, any claims about the other video, supposedly showing the same thing, being a UFO is ridiculous. Probably the best test of UFO nutters' dubious objectively that I've seen.

[Magical Realist]

LOL From a bird with white wings carrying a fish to a bug and then back to a bird. You're really having a hard time with this aren't you?

[Syne]

See, that's called being open-minded. You wouldn't know anything about that.

BTW, the white wings was always your dumb straw man.

[Zinjanthropos]

Watch closely at roughly the 40-second mark and you will see what appears to be the same object flying below the bomber, heading north.

https://youtu.be/QEcDNF833Qc

That is so obviously a bird that you have to be a fully delusional true believer to deny it. And if you can't tell that's an obvious bird, any claims about the other video, supposedly showing the same thing, being a UFO is ridiculous. Probably the best test of UFO nutters' dubious objectively that I've seen.

You ain't kidding. One of the absolutely worst uap vids of all time. This is right up there with the streetlight video.

[Syne]

Yep, highway light, Chinese lantern, Mylar balloon, bigfoot costume, and now... a bird.