Article  Weaponizing integrity + Science's photoshop problem + Max Planck Society's dark side

#1
C C Offline
Abuse of power at Germany's elite research institution (video)
https://www.dw.com/en/max-planck-institu...o-71904207

EXCERPTS: The Max Planck Society is a figurehead of scientific research in Germany [...] But there is a dark side to its facade. For months, DW's investigative unit, along with German news magazine Der Spiegel, has investigated allegations of misconduct perpetrated by senior scientific staff at Max Planck institutes... (MORE - details, video)


Tackling science’s ‘nasty photoshop problem’
https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2025...p-problem/

EXCERPTS: While the scale of the damage done is not easy to measure, we know that researchers trying to build on Dr. Masliah’s work have gone down blind alleys, unwittingly wasted perhaps millions in research funding [...] This is far from being the only example of images being falsified.[...] So it’s not surprising that concerns about image integrity have gained a lot of attention recently. [...] Today, stricter guidance and requirements around image handling are gradually becoming more common. [...] While there’s been a lot of progress, there’s also still some variance across publishers and journals... (MORE - details)


Fraud, blackmail, and the weaponization of integrity
https://fosci.substack.com/p/fraud-black...ponization

EXCERPTS: When I explain the research ecosystem—how it functions, where it breaks, and how bad actors exploit it—I often meet a mix of curiosity and disbelief. [...] For those who may not know, there is a loosely connected group of individuals [...] who dedicate their time to investigating research misconduct, scientific manipulations, and the like.

[...] This brings us to a disturbing example: an investigator ... receives an email [...] Investigate who I tell you to, or I'll fabricate accusations against you. This isn't about integrity anymore—it's a direct career threat, an act of blackmail using the same tools designed to uphold research credibility. Suddenly, the investigator becomes the target.

[...] The providers of these illicit services, often operating internationally, have evolved from targeting [the] vulnerable ... to employing increasingly aggressive tactics, including blackmail, intimidation of academic staff, and now, threats of violence. ... How do we protect both whistleblowers and legitimate researchers from bad-faith attacks? (MORE - details)
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article Publish or perish: the dark side of science + How to fix science C C 0 271 Jun 10, 2023 03:48 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Research finds no gender bias in academic science + WHO's pseudoscience problem C C 0 310 Apr 29, 2023 06:44 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Partisan science is bad for society + Astrobiology: Rise & fall of a nascent science C C 0 277 Apr 12, 2023 04:38 PM
Last Post: C C
  Mandated political prerequisites drive Jonathan Haidt to quit academic society C C 0 420 Oct 5, 2022 04:22 AM
Last Post: C C
  Interview with Lee McIntyre: Science denial & post-truth (on our new Dark Age) C C 2 677 Jul 25, 2021 05:41 PM
Last Post: Yazata
  Black physicist rethinks the 'dark' in dark matter C C 0 337 May 2, 2021 05:11 PM
Last Post: C C
  Science's bullying problem C C 5 1,273 Aug 22, 2018 11:34 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Inevitable evolution of bad science + The problem with science writing C C 1 718 Sep 23, 2016 07:01 PM
Last Post: Syne



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)