Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Article  Publish or perish: the dark side of science + How to fix science

#1
C C Offline
How to fix science
https://www.scivillage.com/thread-14192-...l#pid58211


A researcher who publishes a study every two days reveals the darker side of science
https://english.elpais.com/science-tech/...ience.html

EXCERPTS: Meat expert José Manuel Lorenzo, 46, is the researcher who[...] publishes a study every other day (if you include weekends). It’s an astonishing figure, far above the second-highest ranked scientist: the prestigious ecologist Josep Peñuelas, 65, who published 112 studies in 2022.

[...] Researchers are under brutal pressure to publish studies. Their salary increases, promotions, project funding and social prestige depend on evaluations in which their performance is measured practically by weight. This system — known as “publish or perish” — has created monsters. Thousands of scientists around the world publish at least one study every five days, according to Ioannidis’s calculations. They are the so-called “hyperprolific” researchers, who have an amazing production rate, which is sometimes suspicious.

[...] At one point, Lorenzo began collaborating with exotic researchers — who nobody knew about — on topics that have nothing to do with meat. ... In a telephone conversation with EL PAÍS, Lorenzo admits that he doesn’t know any of these co-authors in person, nor is he an expert on any of these issues.

[...] India is one of the countries where so-called “paper mills” are concentrated — factories that churn out scientific studies which are already written and ready to be published in specialized journals. Co-authorship is offered in exchange for money.

[...] Lorenzo categorically denies having resorted to these services, but he is aware of the existence of a market for the sale of authorship.

[...] Scientific journals have a perverse incentive to publish studies of dubious quality. In the past, it was readers who paid to read the articles, which were inaccessible without a subscription. But in recent years, another model has been imposed, in which the authors themselves are the ones who pay up to $6,500 to private publishers so that their studies can be published with open access to any reader. The change in this model has caused an earthquake in the world of science. In 2015, there were barely a dozen biomedical journals that each published more than 2,000 studies per year, representing 6% of total production between them. There are now 55 of these so-called “mega-journals” — together, they publish almost a quarter of all specialized literature, according to recent research by John Ioannidis.

[...] “We’re losing millions of euros of public money paying for the publication of studies that usually don’t contribute anything — like parrots, they only repeat what everyone already knew about,” laments Delgado Vázquez, from the Pablo de Olavide University, in Seville.... (MORE - missing details)
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article Quest to eliminate vaccine mandates + EBM is broken but SBM can fix it C C 0 71 Aug 29, 2023 07:04 PM
Last Post: C C
  Two "prog" biologists go Ivermectin instead of vaxx + Fix science, don't just fund C C 0 70 Sep 17, 2021 11:15 PM
Last Post: C C
  Funding isn't enough to fix science C C 0 119 May 30, 2021 02:30 AM
Last Post: C C
  Black physicist rethinks the 'dark' in dark matter C C 0 153 May 2, 2021 05:11 PM
Last Post: C C
  Psychology is in a replication crisis. The PSA is trying to fix it. C C 1 124 Apr 9, 2021 07:01 AM
Last Post: Syne
  How Do You Publish the Work of a Scientific Villain? C C 0 361 Dec 17, 2018 06:41 PM
Last Post: C C
  Modelling sci trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure + Brainwashing myth C C 0 354 Jul 20, 2018 03:45 AM
Last Post: C C
  Science is a public good in peril – here’s how to fix it C C 3 873 Nov 18, 2017 12:04 PM
Last Post: RainbowUnicorn



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)