Article  Do Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin work? + Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Experiment

#1
C C Offline
Should Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Experiment be retracted?
https://retractionwatch.com/2025/03/10/g...retracted/

EXCERPT: At some point, when the credibility of a classic study has received so much critique, official retraction, while desirable, becomes redundant. What Le Texier added to the record is not only the dubious value of Zimbardo’s findings but his virtually unacknowledged appropriation of the ideas of his students and his exploitation of mass media to promote his ideas in advance of peer review. If we were seriously talking about retracting the SPE, what exactly would be retracted? (MORE - missing details)


Do Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin Work?
https://reason.com/2025/03/11/do-hydroxy...ctin-work/

EXCERPTS: Feeling pressured by the president, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an emergency use authorization (EUA) for chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine on March 28 for the treatment of COVID-19.

In early April 2020, a team of Australian researchers reported that the antiparasitic compound ivermectin killed COVID-19 viruses in infected cells in a petri dish. During the pandemic in the U.S. the use of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin doubled and increased by tenfold, respectively, from January 30, 2020, to May 11, 2023, according to a 2025 Health Affairs analysis.

Citing emerging scientific data, the FDA on June 15, 2020, revoked its EUA after determining that chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine were unlikely to be effective in treating COVID-19. Again, the whiplash of confusing and contradictory claims and public health decisions about the efficacy of the compounds for treating COVID-19 ended up politicizing the issue.

Since 2020, there have been thousands of studies of the compounds...

[...] After five years of intensive research and debate, the initial hopes that these off-the-shelf compounds might offer significant benefits for the treatment of COVID-19 were not fulfilled. While some data suggest that taking hydroxychloroquine modestly lowers the risk of infection, most recent evidence concludes both compounds are largely ineffective as treatments for COVID-19 infections... (MORE - missing details)
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Research Ivermectin, Plaquenil prescriptions during pandemic soared above pre-pandemic levels C C 0 388 Feb 21, 2025 12:12 AM
Last Post: C C
  Article Revisiting the Stanford Prison Experiment 50 years later (documentary) C C 0 382 Nov 14, 2024 10:34 PM
Last Post: C C
  “Serious concerns” about article on ivermectin, COVID, & microbiome C C 3 574 Jan 28, 2023 12:09 AM
Last Post: confused2
  How Stanford failed the academic freedom test + Dr. Harriet Hall has passed away C C 1 485 Jan 22, 2023 08:43 AM
Last Post: C C
  Stanford University’s fickle commitment to science (Part 1) C C 0 372 Jan 10, 2023 09:10 PM
Last Post: C C
  Debunked: “learned helplessness,” a theory developed from a cruel animal experiment C C 0 552 Mar 25, 2022 05:47 PM
Last Post: C C
  Denmark says sorry for taking Greenland children in 1950s social experiment C C 0 319 Mar 9, 2022 06:01 PM
Last Post: C C
  Biomedical (& social) sciences are riddled with fraud: Real scandal behind ivermectin C C 1 462 Oct 26, 2021 05:16 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Two "prog" biologists go Ivermectin instead of vaxx + Fix science, don't just fund C C 0 307 Sep 17, 2021 11:15 PM
Last Post: C C
  The Nation (magazine) touts astrology + Ivermectin for Covid-19: dearth of evidence C C 1 415 Aug 26, 2021 07:27 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)