Article  UK: threat from Russia, unveils ‘biggest military shake up in 50 years' (Healy style)

#1
C C Offline
UK facing 'new era of threat' from Russia, Defence Secretary says as he unveils ‘biggest military shake up in 50 years’
https://www.lbc.co.uk/politics/uk-faces-...-military/

EXCERPTS: The UK is facing “a new era of threat” from Russia, Defence Secretary John Healey has warned as he promised the "biggest shake-up" to Britain's military in 50 years to ensure the country is prepared for war.

Speaking at the Institute for Government (IfG) on Tuesday, the cabinet minister said Britain needs to 're-arm' if it is to handle pressures from hostile states.

He also unveiled a new command structure in the Ministry of Defence (MoD) and pledged to tear apart Conservative-era policies, replacing them with sweeping reforms to provide a 'more muscular defence for a more dangerous world'.

[...] the defence secretary argued the UK is ‘buying better what our front line forces need’, vowing to cut waste and reduce duplication in the MoD. ... It comes as Sir Keir Starmer said he was ready to put British forces on the ground to help protect Ukraine, which he has described as the “frontline” of Britain.

The Prime minister has also warned Ukraine is "an existential question for Europe as a whole, and therefore vital for Britain's national interests." He continued: "This is a once in a generation moment for the collective security of our continent."

His comments came as Britain, along with Kyiv and Europe, were blocked out of Russia-US peace talks held in Saudi Arabia on Tuesday. [...] Starmer had said troops on the ground were needed to protect Ukraine - with a unified force patrolling the Ukraine-Russia border. Poland, Spain, and Italy joined Germany in raising doubts over the idea.

Following the meeting, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer stressed that a US security guarantee is the only path to peace, saying a "US backstop" is the "only way to effectively deter Russia from attacking Ukraine again"

He is still expected to press his argument for US security guarantees when he flies to Washington for talks with President Donald Trump next week... (MORE - details)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

UK on collision course with Russia over peacekeeping troops in Ukraine
https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/uk-col...ne-3541971

EXCERPTS: European governments are currently split on whether to send troops to protect Kyiv against the threat of a fresh invasion by Russia. The UK and France are most enthusiastic about the idea, with German participation likely to hinge on the result of the country’s election which is taking place at the weekend.

But Russia’s foreign minister warned following talks with the Trump administration in Saudi Arabia that the Kremlin could not accept Western troops policing a deal in Ukraine.

Sergei Lavrov said: “We explained today that the appearance of armed forces from the same NATO countries, but under a false flag, under the flag of the European Union or under national flags, does not change anything in this regard. Of course this is unacceptable to us.”

His comments put Russia starkly at odds with the UK on how a peace agreement would be enforced – at the same time as Starmer faces the challenge of persuading the US President not to abandon the protection of Ukraine altogether.

[...] H.R. McMaster, a former US Army general who was national security adviser during Trump’s first term in office, predicted this week that American troops would end up protecting Ukraine following any peace deal.

He said: “I think there will be de facto US security guarantees if not de jure US security guarantees. If there are Nato troops inside Ukraine and there is a ceasefire, we should go back into the Black Sea for example with our ships.

“So I can see the US being like, outside-in security, and if Nato forces came under duress, an attack on one is an attack on all and I think the United States could probably destroy every single Russian position outside of Russia in the period of maybe half a day, and I think Russia knows that.”

The precise make-up of a multinational peacekeeping force is still subject to negotiation, after the summit in Paris organised by Emmanuel Macron on Monday ended without agreement on a unified European response... (MORE - missing details)
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article UK seeks to bolster military in Greenland and the Arctic (frigid fashions) C C 5 29 Jan 12, 2026 01:22 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Article UK government accused of double standards over US military action in Venezuela -style C C 7 81 Jan 7, 2026 02:28 AM
Last Post: Syne
  "The last time I was here was 1991, for the big military parade then." (army style) C C 2 611 Jun 16, 2025 04:42 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Article Military chiefs to plan for ‘operational phase’ of Ukraine peace deal C C 0 434 Mar 16, 2025 01:02 AM
Last Post: C C
  Article UK troops may protect peace in Ukraine for 'many years' + Spying for Russia style C C 1 592 Mar 9, 2025 03:50 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Article Nigel Farage biggest reason voters wouldn't back Reform, poll suggests (UK fashions) C C 0 389 Feb 9, 2025 01:07 AM
Last Post: C C
  Halifax school drops ask that military ditch uniforms for Rem-Day (memorial fashions) C C 0 448 Nov 8, 2024 11:18 PM
Last Post: C C
  Inside Russia's failing war machine: The last chance. (depopulation style) C C 2 675 Aug 20, 2024 04:30 PM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos
  Article UK to develop hypersonic missiles to catch up with China & Russia (armed fashions) C C 0 491 Apr 28, 2024 08:26 AM
Last Post: C C
  Article (military style) US ‘ready to fight in space if we have to’ + Space Force confusion C C 0 397 May 29, 2023 02:48 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)