Article  The gratuitous, endless mask debate (fashions in face apparel)

#1
C C Offline
The Gratuitous, Endless Mask Debate (ACSH)
https://www.acsh.org/news/2024/12/03/gra...dits-49137

INTRO: There is overwhelming evidence that high-quality masks reduce the spread of aerosol-spread infectious diseases, including COVID-19. The folks at City Journal must not be aware of the Rule of Holes, “When you’re in a hole, stop digging.” Their contributors continue to make insupportable, easily disproved claims about the supposed lack of effectiveness of masks to prevent COVID-19.

Contributing editor John Tierney, unfazed by a thorough debunking of his first set of claims in February 2023 that masks don’t work to prevent COVID-19 infections, delivered yet another inaccurate, misleading rant six months later. In the latter article, he presented – or I should say, misrepresented -- various studies and cherry-picked others. I responded in print to that article as well, discussing his errors at length... (MORE - details)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

No Masks, Please, We’re Rational (City Journal)
https://www.city-journal.org/article/no-...e-rational

INTRO: Unfazed by data, scientific research, or common sense, the maskaholics are back. In response to an uptick in Covid cases, they’ve begun reinstating mask mandates. So far, it’s just a few places—a college in Atlanta, a Hollywood studio, two hospitals in Syracuse—but the mainstream media and their favorite “experts” are working hard to scare the rest of us into masking up yet again.

Never mind that at least 97 percent of Americans have Covid antibodies in their blood as a result of infection, vaccination, or both. Never mind that actual experts—the ones who studied the scientific literature before 2020 and drew up plans for a pandemic—advised against masking the public. Never mind that their advice has been further bolstered during the pandemic by randomized clinical trials and rigorous observational studies failing to find an effect of masks and mask mandates. Scientific evidence cannot overcome the maskaholics’ faith.

It’s tempting to compare them with the villagers in Cambodia who erected scarecrows in front of their huts to ward off the coronavirus—but that’s not fair to the villagers... (MORE - details)
Reply
#2
Syne Offline
If you're afraid of Covid, you should take all the precautions you want. Don't infringe on the freedoms of those who are willing to take the risk.
A high tolerance for risk would have led to the Omicron variant (spread more easily but far less lethal) faster.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Research Fiber computer allows apparel to run apps & “understand” the wearer (smart clothing) C C 1 1,353 Feb 28, 2025 12:50 AM
Last Post: confused2
  Article JB was just suffering from a cold (fashions in debate) C C 41 3,851 Jul 12, 2024 08:52 AM
Last Post: stryder
  Article UK: Emily Bridges needs to face biological reality (fashions in fe-"male" sports) C C 0 365 Feb 22, 2024 02:20 AM
Last Post: C C
  The Definitive Coronavirus Mask Yazata 1 361 Aug 10, 2020 06:22 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Why I Won't Debate Science (current fashions in public relations) C C 1 605 Jun 23, 2018 12:17 AM
Last Post: Syne
  The Face Shape That Is Most Attractive To Women C C 3 851 Aug 28, 2017 05:27 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Latest Korean Beauty Product - Snail Slime, for your Face Yazata 1 710 Jul 20, 2017 12:27 AM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)