
RELATED THREAD: Eric Weinstein - Are We on The Brink of a Revolution?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CHRIS WILLIAMSON
https://youtu.be/hDX5q30V_-E
VIDEO EXCERPTS: Can you please try and explain to me how you interpret: "What can be unburdened by what has been". What does that mean?
I don't know if I should. There's a line in Marx where sometimes you hear certain phrases like "a world to win". AOC uses the phrase. We "have a world to win", which comes from the end of the Communist Manifesto.
[...] It basically says you have to wipe out what has been to arrive in the new. And where's it from what can be unburdened by what has been. [...] It's not a direct translation, but it occurs in Karl Marx.
[...] If you think about what Mao had to do to wipe out Chinese history, what Pol Pot had had to do... You're trying to wipe out memory, because the memory has all of this burden.
Why is it important to go after doctors and lawyers and teachers and professors? Because in some sense, they are going to resist the New Order that you're about to impose. You're looking for a blank slate, they like a tether to the past.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NOTE: The derivation is that, but what this actually highlights is that the critical theory politics of today is intellectually descended from Marxism, with Antonio Gramsci as one of transitional mediators of the past broadening it from the original class struggle between bourgeoisie and proletariat to battling other power structures. Like the "racist/sexist/etc hegemony" that's supposedly oppressing marginalized population groups. The historical inspiration is communist (ergo the quotes), but the creature has been refined and modified since the 1950s to accommodate progressive and social democrat consumption.
Why does Kamala Harris keep repeating this quote? (Eric Weinstein)
https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/hDX5q30V_-E
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CHRIS WILLIAMSON
https://youtu.be/hDX5q30V_-E
VIDEO EXCERPTS: Can you please try and explain to me how you interpret: "What can be unburdened by what has been". What does that mean?
I don't know if I should. There's a line in Marx where sometimes you hear certain phrases like "a world to win". AOC uses the phrase. We "have a world to win", which comes from the end of the Communist Manifesto.
[...] It basically says you have to wipe out what has been to arrive in the new. And where's it from what can be unburdened by what has been. [...] It's not a direct translation, but it occurs in Karl Marx.
[...] If you think about what Mao had to do to wipe out Chinese history, what Pol Pot had had to do... You're trying to wipe out memory, because the memory has all of this burden.
Why is it important to go after doctors and lawyers and teachers and professors? Because in some sense, they are going to resist the New Order that you're about to impose. You're looking for a blank slate, they like a tether to the past.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NOTE: The derivation is that, but what this actually highlights is that the critical theory politics of today is intellectually descended from Marxism, with Antonio Gramsci as one of transitional mediators of the past broadening it from the original class struggle between bourgeoisie and proletariat to battling other power structures. Like the "racist/sexist/etc hegemony" that's supposedly oppressing marginalized population groups. The historical inspiration is communist (ergo the quotes), but the creature has been refined and modified since the 1950s to accommodate progressive and social democrat consumption.
Why does Kamala Harris keep repeating this quote? (Eric Weinstein)