Article  At light speed, Einstein’s equations break down and "nothing makes sense"

#11
confused2 Offline
K. Wrote:To anyone properly versed in SR,
I am at best a dabbler in SR so always happy to be corrected.
I like to think of SR as a description of the properties of spacetime with 'the speed of light' © as a pervasive constant. Massless particles probably ought to zip around 'at the speed of light' with no rational interpretation of time or distance - I've dabbled in SR for long enough that this no longer seems surprising or an indication of anything being broken. BUT. In the real world we have photons - massless particles zipping around at 'c' with definite frequency (time) and wavelength (distance) properties. IMHO more a triumph of quantum mechanics than a failure of SR.
Reply
#12
Kornee Offline
QED/QFT buffs will quickly point out or anyway claim it's impossible to come up with a physical picture of what a photon 'really looks like'. All down to math that works.
I recall one thread at PF where a member asked if there was proof photons can only be emitted if an absorber exists somewhere else in the universe.
So I did a very easy experiment. Laser pointer shone through a slightly frosted clear plastic plate. Most of the beam transmits but it's easy to note the intensity of the scattered part. Aimed first at the ground where essentially full absorption of the transmitted beam occurs. Then up at the clear night sky. No discernible difference in scattered intensity. Lack of a mysterious dimming indicating that photons don't need to 'know in advance' that a distant absorber is there before being emitted.

Given that light from very distant galaxies arrives with minimal scattering absorption, and has traveled from a time when everything was much more crowded, light currently shone into the great yonder will have an indefinitely easier journey as the ever expanding universe continually thins out. Further, cosmic stretching of wavelength will mean photons emitted by a given atomic orbital transition will sooner or later no longer be able to be absorbed in reverse fashion.

I can't recall the exact reaction from the forum member, but it was probably silence.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article Misconception: The real reason we can't travel FTL + Einstein against black holes C C 3 256 Sep 1, 2025 07:29 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Research Did they just break quantum physics? C C 2 257 Aug 27, 2025 11:50 PM
Last Post: confused2
  Article A new geometry for Einstein’s theory of relativity C C 0 318 Jul 19, 2025 10:31 PM
Last Post: C C
  Dark matter formed when fast particles slowed down and got heavy, new theory says C C 0 417 May 15, 2025 03:04 AM
Last Post: C C
  Research Bubbles that break the rules: The fluid discovery that defies logic C C 0 881 Feb 26, 2025 01:06 AM
Last Post: C C
  Article The right chemistry: Breaking down bioplastics' benefits and problems C C 0 473 Sep 15, 2024 10:12 PM
Last Post: C C
  Tweak to Schrödinger's cat could unite Einstein's relativity and quantum mechanics C C 2 714 Apr 29, 2024 02:06 PM
Last Post: confused2
  'Light speed' electrons discovered for the 1st time, described by 4 dimensions C C 0 472 Mar 20, 2024 05:36 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article The true reason why Einstein was history’s greatest physicist? C C 1 493 Feb 17, 2024 08:47 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Article The superconductor dispute + The real reason we can’t outpace light speed C C 0 331 Mar 28, 2023 08:18 AM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)