Article  At light speed, Einstein’s equations break down and "nothing makes sense"

#11
confused2 Offline
K. Wrote:To anyone properly versed in SR,
I am at best a dabbler in SR so always happy to be corrected.
I like to think of SR as a description of the properties of spacetime with 'the speed of light' © as a pervasive constant. Massless particles probably ought to zip around 'at the speed of light' with no rational interpretation of time or distance - I've dabbled in SR for long enough that this no longer seems surprising or an indication of anything being broken. BUT. In the real world we have photons - massless particles zipping around at 'c' with definite frequency (time) and wavelength (distance) properties. IMHO more a triumph of quantum mechanics than a failure of SR.
Reply
#12
Kornee Offline
QED/QFT buffs will quickly point out or anyway claim it's impossible to come up with a physical picture of what a photon 'really looks like'. All down to math that works.
I recall one thread at PF where a member asked if there was proof photons can only be emitted if an absorber exists somewhere else in the universe.
So I did a very easy experiment. Laser pointer shone through a slightly frosted clear plastic plate. Most of the beam transmits but it's easy to note the intensity of the scattered part. Aimed first at the ground where essentially full absorption of the transmitted beam occurs. Then up at the clear night sky. No discernible difference in scattered intensity. Lack of a mysterious dimming indicating that photons don't need to 'know in advance' that a distant absorber is there before being emitted.

Given that light from very distant galaxies arrives with minimal scattering absorption, and has traveled from a time when everything was much more crowded, light currently shone into the great yonder will have an indefinitely easier journey as the ever expanding universe continually thins out. Further, cosmic stretching of wavelength will mean photons emitted by a given atomic orbital transition will sooner or later no longer be able to be absorbed in reverse fashion.

I can't recall the exact reaction from the forum member, but it was probably silence.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Research Scientists develop plastics that can break down, tackling pollution (chemistry) C C 0 344 Dec 1, 2025 07:40 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article How to understand Einstein's relativity without math + What is a manifold? C C 1 507 Nov 7, 2025 12:08 AM
Last Post: confused2
  The change that changes nothing (symmetry) Magical Realist 0 405 Nov 3, 2025 07:06 AM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Solid and liquid light created at room temp Magical Realist 0 437 Oct 20, 2025 11:09 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Article Misconception: The real reason we can't travel FTL + Einstein against black holes C C 3 908 Sep 1, 2025 07:29 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Research Did they just break quantum physics? C C 2 816 Aug 27, 2025 11:50 PM
Last Post: confused2
  Article A new geometry for Einstein’s theory of relativity C C 0 562 Jul 19, 2025 10:31 PM
Last Post: C C
  Dark matter formed when fast particles slowed down and got heavy, new theory says C C 0 630 May 15, 2025 03:04 AM
Last Post: C C
  Research Bubbles that break the rules: The fluid discovery that defies logic C C 0 1,198 Feb 26, 2025 01:06 AM
Last Post: C C
  Article The right chemistry: Breaking down bioplastics' benefits and problems C C 0 656 Sep 15, 2024 10:12 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)