These experiments could prove Einstein wrong

#1
C C Offline
http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2022/03...stein.html

EXCERPTS: . . . General Relativity is now more than a century old, and so far its predictions have all held up. [...] The most important reason physicists think that general relativity must be wrong is that it doesn’t work together with quantum mechanics...

[...] one of the ways to prove Einstein wrong is to bring more massive objects into quantum superpositions and then measure their gravitational field. If the gravitational field is also in a quantum superposition, then that means general relativity is out and Einstein wrong. This avenue is pursued for example by the group of Markus Aspelmeyer in Vienna.

[...] What would it be good for to prove Einstein wrong? Well, first of all it would give us experimental guidance to develop a theory of quantum gravity, and that could help us understand the quantum properties of space and time, as well as what’s inside black holes or what happened at the big bang.

Many physicists also hope that it will shed light on other puzzles, such as dark matter and dark energy, or explain some nagging anomalous observations in cosmology, like the presence of too many large structures in the universe, which we talked about in an earlier video, or that different measurement of the Hubble rate don’t give the same results.

Personally I think the most promising way to prove Einstein wrong is the approach pursued by the group of Aspelmeyer. And if they succeed they’ll almost certainly win a Nobel Prize. But it’s quite possible that in the end the breakthrough will happen in a way that no one saw coming... (MORE - missing details)

https://youtu.be/Bo4al7sNPkE

https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/Bo4al7sNPkE
Reply
Reply
#3
confused2 Offline
A bit of wild speculation here..

Channelling Feynman (QED) if we try to treat space as continuous all sorts of infinities appear in QM and everything blows up. Clearly space hasn't blown up so QM uses tricksies to get rid of the infinities the theory predicts. If you have a theory like GR that doesn't involve (many) tricksies and one like QM that is riddled with tricksies you might want to look at ways to apply the QM tricksies to GR and .. find they don't work. Is the problem with GR or QM?
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article How to understand Einstein's relativity without math + What is a manifold? C C 1 445 Nov 7, 2025 12:08 AM
Last Post: confused2
  Research Did these physicists just prove true randomness? C C 0 604 Sep 10, 2025 09:10 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Misconception: The real reason we can't travel FTL + Einstein against black holes C C 3 805 Sep 1, 2025 07:29 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Article A new geometry for Einstein’s theory of relativity C C 0 509 Jul 19, 2025 10:31 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Time is an illusion, and these physicists say they know how it works C C 1 815 Aug 7, 2024 10:17 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Tweak to Schrödinger's cat could unite Einstein's relativity and quantum mechanics C C 2 991 Apr 29, 2024 02:06 PM
Last Post: confused2
  Article The true reason why Einstein was history’s greatest physicist? C C 1 699 Feb 17, 2024 08:47 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Article Physicists prove double-slit experiment can be recreated in time, not just space C C 10 1,753 Apr 6, 2023 04:07 AM
Last Post: Kornee
  Article At light speed, Einstein’s equations break down and "nothing makes sense" C C 11 2,271 Mar 23, 2023 02:24 PM
Last Post: Kornee
  Was Einstein wrong? + Wormhole tunnels may be possible, new studies suggest C C 0 437 May 22, 2021 08:17 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)