Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

These experiments could prove Einstein wrong

#1
C C Offline
http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2022/03...stein.html

EXCERPTS: . . . General Relativity is now more than a century old, and so far its predictions have all held up. [...] The most important reason physicists think that general relativity must be wrong is that it doesn’t work together with quantum mechanics...

[...] one of the ways to prove Einstein wrong is to bring more massive objects into quantum superpositions and then measure their gravitational field. If the gravitational field is also in a quantum superposition, then that means general relativity is out and Einstein wrong. This avenue is pursued for example by the group of Markus Aspelmeyer in Vienna.

[...] What would it be good for to prove Einstein wrong? Well, first of all it would give us experimental guidance to develop a theory of quantum gravity, and that could help us understand the quantum properties of space and time, as well as what’s inside black holes or what happened at the big bang.

Many physicists also hope that it will shed light on other puzzles, such as dark matter and dark energy, or explain some nagging anomalous observations in cosmology, like the presence of too many large structures in the universe, which we talked about in an earlier video, or that different measurement of the Hubble rate don’t give the same results.

Personally I think the most promising way to prove Einstein wrong is the approach pursued by the group of Aspelmeyer. And if they succeed they’ll almost certainly win a Nobel Prize. But it’s quite possible that in the end the breakthrough will happen in a way that no one saw coming... (MORE - missing details)

https://youtu.be/Bo4al7sNPkE

https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/Bo4al7sNPkE
Reply
Reply
#3
confused2 Offline
A bit of wild speculation here..

Channelling Feynman (QED) if we try to treat space as continuous all sorts of infinities appear in QM and everything blows up. Clearly space hasn't blown up so QM uses tricksies to get rid of the infinities the theory predicts. If you have a theory like GR that doesn't involve (many) tricksies and one like QM that is riddled with tricksies you might want to look at ways to apply the QM tricksies to GR and .. find they don't work. Is the problem with GR or QM?
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article The true reason why Einstein was history’s greatest physicist? C C 1 58 Feb 17, 2024 08:47 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Article Physicists prove double-slit experiment can be recreated in time, not just space C C 10 283 Apr 6, 2023 04:07 AM
Last Post: Kornee
  Article At light speed, Einstein’s equations break down and "nothing makes sense" C C 11 376 Mar 23, 2023 02:24 PM
Last Post: Kornee
  Was Einstein wrong? + Wormhole tunnels may be possible, new studies suggest C C 0 120 May 22, 2021 08:17 PM
Last Post: C C
  Thank chemist Stephanie Kwolek for kevlar + Why Einstein's GR cannot be quite right C C 0 263 Aug 20, 2019 09:34 PM
Last Post: C C
  Could the Big Bang be wrong? C C 1 269 Jun 23, 2019 08:02 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Can physics prove multiverse? + Search 4 hidden dimensions + Violating macro-realism C C 1 847 Apr 21, 2016 02:09 AM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  String theory: From Newton to Einstein and beyond C C 0 660 Oct 28, 2014 04:57 AM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)