Migration no longer worth it + 99.9% of studies agree: Humans caused climate change

[confused2]

@Syne,
It is my intent to use the best data I can find to allow others to make decisions - as far as global warming is concerned, personally, I don't have a dog in the fight.
The graph I posted was intended to show that there is no simple relationship between global temperature and local climate temperature - by all means, using your preferred source, give your estimate of the difference in global temperature between what we associate with the 'medieval warm period' and the 'little ice age'.

Sea level height is probably the best indicator of actual global warming with the slight problem that most land is either rising or falling for other reasons. Do you have a sea level graph/data that you are happy with?

[Syne]

I'm just pointing out that time ranges can be easily chosen to make less significant changes appear more significant. And that climate change alarmists will always pick ones like you posted, deny the past scientific consensus of a looming ice age, etc.. As you can see from the numbers, they are the same data, but people are emotionally swayed by the appearance of a sharply spiking graph over actual data. It's just how humans work, and some choose to take advantage of it.

Again, you pick the right time range, and the a steady increase in sea level looks more par for the course of natural variation.

[Image: Kopp-2016-sea-level-rise-500-BC-to-2000-475x247.jpg]

Just like people who claim the Rapture is nigh, we won't actually know if the world is going to end until it's way too late. Climate scientists claiming to "know" is no better than the street preacher.