Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Communication researcher shows free will is key to combat online extremism

#1
C C Offline
https://www.utsa.edu/today/2021/04/story...emism.html

RELEASE: Douglas Wilbur ’14, a visiting Ph.D. scholar in the Department of Communication at UTSA, has published a study that shows how researchers can craft message campaigns to protect individuals from adopting extremist views.

According to his research, when people are explicitly told that they are free to accept or reject propagandistic claims, the likelihood of choosing a moderate view increases. This was a result of a survey of attitudes that tested counter-propaganda strategies, which stressed a person’s autonomy, and then measured sentiments after exposure.

The study was recently published in Social Influence with collaborators at the University of Missouri.

“It’s ironic, if you think about it. Empowering individuals to make choices when they encounter extremist messaging appears to help people resist such claims,” Wilbur said. “What this research showed is consistent with other findings. You tend to see a trend where people will make the right choice.”

The Pew Research Center found that two out of every three Americans say social media has a negative impact on what occurs within the U.S. The primary reasons listed in that same survey were misinformation and hate speech.

To combat propaganda in the past, strategists have relied on attitude inoculation theory. Analogous to how physical vaccines inoculate people against a virus, communication messages use psychological inoculation through exposure to both negative messages but also techniques to resist such attacks. As a result, people train and build their psychological immunity to resist future persuasion attempts. The shortcoming of this approach, however, is that it’s difficult to apply to large groups.

With that limitation in mind, Wilbur tested two counter-propaganda strategies for boosting peoples’ resistance to extremist propaganda. One is based on self-determination theory, or DPT, which argues that people are curious, active, and health-seeking as long as their psychological needs are met. Primarily, in this approach, the individual needs to have agency and control over their actions. Similarly, the other strategy tested relies on psychological reactance theory, or PRT, which assumes that people have strong negative  reactions when they feel their freedom is threatened.

Wilbur recruited close to 400 participants online and told them they would read extremist messages. Respondents were randomly assigned to either a neutral control condition, a DPT approach (‘it is your choice to agree or not’), or  the PRT condition (‘don’t let them manipulate you’). They then read and rated their agreement of  two anti-immigrant extremist messages. After exposure, both campaigns produced lower agreement to the extremist messages when compared  to the control condition—regardless of political affiliation. 

Wilbur elaborated that the benefits of these agency-based campaigns is that they can be built beforehand and are not message-specific. These proactive strategies and the resulting advantages are a departure from previous approaches that Wilbur himself used during his military tour in Afghanistan. There, he served as a communications officer and was tasked with blocking Al-Qaeda recruiting efforts, yet the existing communications methods at his disposal were slow and reactive.

“Al-Qaeda would put out a video to recruit. Then we would have to discredit it, but this would take time to get a counter-product (opposing argument via pamphlets or videos) out there,” Wilbur recalled.

His approach aims to disrupt the radicalization process among vulnerable population groups. “If we could prime people to think they have autonomy, then yes, they would be more likely to resist propagandist messages,” Wilbur said. “We can even build messages about the COVID–19 vaccine—campaigns that tell people that they can chose whether to take the vaccine or not. You want to stress freedom.”
Reply
#2
Syne Offline
This is expected, in light of past studies on belief in free will.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article Swedish scientist: Eat humans to combat climate change (cadaver stats) C C 0 65 Jun 23, 2023 05:56 PM
Last Post: C C
  (UK) Hate speech detection shows greater online abuse for MPs from BAME backgrounds C C 0 74 Sep 17, 2021 02:02 AM
Last Post: C C
  More Americans say government should take steps to restrict false information online C C 5 143 Sep 7, 2021 04:15 AM
Last Post: Leigha
  Children learned ‘little or nothing’ during school closures, despite online learning C C 0 129 Apr 8, 2021 06:30 PM
Last Post: C C
  China using ‘Muslim tracker’ database, researcher says C C 0 252 Feb 20, 2019 08:34 PM
Last Post: C C
  The key to jobs in the future is not college but compassion C C 2 456 Jul 4, 2017 03:11 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Frozen meal eaters have better intakes of key nutrients for fewer calories C C 0 627 Oct 21, 2014 03:20 AM
Last Post: C C
  Bioinformatician helps biologists find key genes C C 0 595 Oct 15, 2014 03:33 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)